>-- Then this too needs to be investigated. And also one has to ask:how his
>F's own statement as quoted,
>plays a role in covering up F's own strategies of authorship. I sense that
>F
>wished to be seen somewhat fictionally. There is an interview somewhere
>where he states his work is fiction but true. I am not certain of where
>that
>statement can be found. But the violence in his work and life, which.
>G.Deleuze speaks of is noticeable in the statement that you have quoted. I
>will have to dig up some of the critiques by feminists of F.
>
>
>>What, do you imagine that I would take so much trouble and so much
>>pleasure
>>in writing, do you think that I would keep so persistently to my task, if
>>I
>>were not preparing-- with a rather shaky hand --a labyrinth into which I
>>can venture, in which I can move my discourse, opening up underground
>>passages, forcing it to go far from itself, finding overhangs that reduce
>>and deform its itinerary, in which I can lose myself and appear at last to
>>eyes that I will never have to meet again. I am no doubt not the only one
>>who writes in order to have no face. DO NOT ASK WHO i AM AND DO NOT ASK
>>ME
>>TO REMAIN THE SAME: LEAVE IT TO OUR BUREAUCRATS AND OUR POLICE TO SEE
>>THAT
>>OUR PAPERS ARE IN ORDER. At least spare us their morality when we
>>write.'"
>>(Foucault 1972; 17).
>>
>
>
>
>Regards,
>
>C.Driscoll
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com