Certainly you are familiar with the TV chef, Emeril and his expression,
"Let's kick it up a notch". If not, you will need to watch one show as a
prerequisite(wherever you see +++ in the post below, it means "'Let's kick
it up a notch' 3x or more!")
Now let us go to the nursery and keep your eye focused on the "desire"
(units of desire= '+'):
It's a Monday morning. Bobby was dropped off by his mother at the day-care
center early. He's the first one to arrive. He is sitting all alone in the
middle of the room, surround by nursery pictures on the wall and a few toys
scattered about on the floor. He sits there, almost in the middle, somewhat
trying to get a handle on his day(planning-reviewing his Daytimer, making
entries on his PalmPilot, etc., etc., etc.). He glances ever so slightly at
one of the toys.
At the very same moment, the door opens and the day care center worker,
leads Donald(his siblings call him Dooner) into the room by the hand. The
very first thing that Dooner notices is Bobby. And Dooner entered the room
just in time to notice Bobby gave that ever so slight glance towards one of
the toys [+++] (remember, keep your eye on the desire!). Dooner sets his
trajectory towards the toy. Bobby watches Dooner's first moves [+++-+++]!
Bobby throws his Daytimer and Palm to the floor and starts crawling, rising
to walk, rising to run, in the direction of the TOY. Dooner glances and
sees Bobby [+++-+++-+++]. Dooner's gait increases. Bobby's now standing
and in a full run [+++-+++-+++]. Dooner [+++-+++-+++-+++] Bobby
[+++-+++-+++-+++-+++], and like BatMan Comic book, any parent can finish the
story...
Neitzke
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lionel Boxer" <lboxer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 7:15 PM
Subject: Then what is the violence motivated by ... ? Re: Foucault and
Terrorism
> Nathaniel Roberts <npr4@xxxxxxxxxxxx> says:
>
> >To call it "Jewish violence" or to blame Jews for what is happening is to
> >subscribe to the very racist and binary logic that we oppose.
>
> In the early 1900s, there was aparently a sort of ethnic cleansing going
on
> by Jewish settlers in Palestine. Perhaps they were motivated by the last
> few lines of the Book of Ezra - who knows.
>
> That could be referred to as Jewish Violence and that tradition could be
> seen continued today. What was the Stern Gang? ... not sure. In any
> event, the action was to create a Jewish State of Isreal. With the aid of
> Masonic influenced British, the State of Isreal was formed. I commented
> once before on this list that Masonic ritual is laced with implications
that
> Jews belong in Isreal; mind you Masonic ritual is based on Old and New
> Testiment stories - promised land stuff.
>
> If we believe the Biblical stories, then there were Jews established in
> Isreal 5,000 years ago. The 12 Tribes (plus the 13th Levi or preist
Tribe)
> split up and some stayed and others went away. The story goes that the
> Tribles of Judah and Benjamine remained in Isreal and that there is
> continuity in that part of the world through those families:
>
> >From http://www.losttribes.org/:
> 'When Solomon^s son Rehoboam became king, the tribes sought relief from
the
> high taxes his father placed on them. He refused their request, so 9 of
the
> 13 tribes seceded and created the Kingdom of Israel, leaving 4 remaining
> tribes (Judah, Benjamin, Simeon and most of Levi) to become the Kingdom of
> Judea. ... In time the 9 tribes of the Kingdom of Israel plus the tribe of
> Simeon fell into sin through idol worship and casting off the Sabbath,'
>
> So, Isreal is the name of the Lost Tribes, who eventually left Palestine.
> It could follow, to call the place Isreal implies that these people who
left
> 5,000 years ago are returning. In this light Judea might be a more
settling
> name. But it is not. Logic tells me that the someone was displaced from
> their land 50 years ago, they have more right to that land than people who
> were displaced 5,000 years ago. But this discourse is not about logic it
is
> about religion.
>
> What happened in the 1940s under NAZIism has blinded the world to other
> perspectives.
>
> Building on what Nathaniel says, not all Christians, Muslims, Jews or
others
> are violent, but when violence is conducted in the name of a specific
> religion then surely it could be labelled with that religion? I don't
know.
>
> I am not siding either way, I am just reacting to Nathaniel's refusal to
> accept what the violence is motivated by religion. Furthermore, I am not
> saying this from an anti-Jewish perspective. I think the Jews have every
> right to protect their interests (especially given the 2,000 year history
of
> anti-semetism), but I question their right to carry their discourse to the
> extent that Palestinians react by blowing themselves up.
>
> God Bless and Live in Peace
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
>
"Let's kick it up a notch". If not, you will need to watch one show as a
prerequisite(wherever you see +++ in the post below, it means "'Let's kick
it up a notch' 3x or more!")
Now let us go to the nursery and keep your eye focused on the "desire"
(units of desire= '+'):
It's a Monday morning. Bobby was dropped off by his mother at the day-care
center early. He's the first one to arrive. He is sitting all alone in the
middle of the room, surround by nursery pictures on the wall and a few toys
scattered about on the floor. He sits there, almost in the middle, somewhat
trying to get a handle on his day(planning-reviewing his Daytimer, making
entries on his PalmPilot, etc., etc., etc.). He glances ever so slightly at
one of the toys.
At the very same moment, the door opens and the day care center worker,
leads Donald(his siblings call him Dooner) into the room by the hand. The
very first thing that Dooner notices is Bobby. And Dooner entered the room
just in time to notice Bobby gave that ever so slight glance towards one of
the toys [+++] (remember, keep your eye on the desire!). Dooner sets his
trajectory towards the toy. Bobby watches Dooner's first moves [+++-+++]!
Bobby throws his Daytimer and Palm to the floor and starts crawling, rising
to walk, rising to run, in the direction of the TOY. Dooner glances and
sees Bobby [+++-+++-+++]. Dooner's gait increases. Bobby's now standing
and in a full run [+++-+++-+++]. Dooner [+++-+++-+++-+++] Bobby
[+++-+++-+++-+++-+++], and like BatMan Comic book, any parent can finish the
story...
Neitzke
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lionel Boxer" <lboxer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 7:15 PM
Subject: Then what is the violence motivated by ... ? Re: Foucault and
Terrorism
> Nathaniel Roberts <npr4@xxxxxxxxxxxx> says:
>
> >To call it "Jewish violence" or to blame Jews for what is happening is to
> >subscribe to the very racist and binary logic that we oppose.
>
> In the early 1900s, there was aparently a sort of ethnic cleansing going
on
> by Jewish settlers in Palestine. Perhaps they were motivated by the last
> few lines of the Book of Ezra - who knows.
>
> That could be referred to as Jewish Violence and that tradition could be
> seen continued today. What was the Stern Gang? ... not sure. In any
> event, the action was to create a Jewish State of Isreal. With the aid of
> Masonic influenced British, the State of Isreal was formed. I commented
> once before on this list that Masonic ritual is laced with implications
that
> Jews belong in Isreal; mind you Masonic ritual is based on Old and New
> Testiment stories - promised land stuff.
>
> If we believe the Biblical stories, then there were Jews established in
> Isreal 5,000 years ago. The 12 Tribes (plus the 13th Levi or preist
Tribe)
> split up and some stayed and others went away. The story goes that the
> Tribles of Judah and Benjamine remained in Isreal and that there is
> continuity in that part of the world through those families:
>
> >From http://www.losttribes.org/:
> 'When Solomon^s son Rehoboam became king, the tribes sought relief from
the
> high taxes his father placed on them. He refused their request, so 9 of
the
> 13 tribes seceded and created the Kingdom of Israel, leaving 4 remaining
> tribes (Judah, Benjamin, Simeon and most of Levi) to become the Kingdom of
> Judea. ... In time the 9 tribes of the Kingdom of Israel plus the tribe of
> Simeon fell into sin through idol worship and casting off the Sabbath,'
>
> So, Isreal is the name of the Lost Tribes, who eventually left Palestine.
> It could follow, to call the place Isreal implies that these people who
left
> 5,000 years ago are returning. In this light Judea might be a more
settling
> name. But it is not. Logic tells me that the someone was displaced from
> their land 50 years ago, they have more right to that land than people who
> were displaced 5,000 years ago. But this discourse is not about logic it
is
> about religion.
>
> What happened in the 1940s under NAZIism has blinded the world to other
> perspectives.
>
> Building on what Nathaniel says, not all Christians, Muslims, Jews or
others
> are violent, but when violence is conducted in the name of a specific
> religion then surely it could be labelled with that religion? I don't
know.
>
> I am not siding either way, I am just reacting to Nathaniel's refusal to
> accept what the violence is motivated by religion. Furthermore, I am not
> saying this from an anti-Jewish perspective. I think the Jews have every
> right to protect their interests (especially given the 2,000 year history
of
> anti-semetism), but I question their right to carry their discourse to the
> extent that Palestinians react by blowing themselves up.
>
> God Bless and Live in Peace
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
>