RE: foucault-digest V2 #639

Thanks for posting these reviews. The New Statesman one does point out the
problem of the title though. It should be not Society Must Be Defended but
'Society Must Be Defended'.

Stuart

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Ali Rizvi
> Sent: 17 September 2003 05:09
> To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: foucault-digest V2 #639
>
>
>
> And this review I came across tells more about one who has written than
> about Focuault I guess
>
> http://www.newstatesman.com/site.php3?newTemplate=NSReview_Bshop&n
ewDisplayURN=300000072674
>
> ali
>
> ----Original Message Follows----
> From: "Jeremy Crampton" <jcrampton@xxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: <foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: foucault-digest V2 #639
> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 10:43:43 -0400
>
> There is another review essay in History of the Human Sciences, 11(4), pp.
> 159-170 (1998) by Neil Levy.
>
> Levy points out that the last lecture (a good one imho) was previously
> published in 1991, which I wasn't previously aware of. It was in Les Temps
> Modernes, 535, pp. 37-61.
>
> __
> Jeremy Crampton
> 404 651-1763
> http://monarch.gsu.edu/jcrampton/
>
>
>
> > Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 14:21:42 +1000
> > From: "Mark Kelly" <mgekelly@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Society Must Be Defended
> >
> > hi all
> > does anyone know of any journal (or even newspaper) reviews of Society
> Must
> > Be Defended, as I'm writing one and want to check out the competition?
> > cheers
> > mark
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Stay in touch with absent friends - get MSN Messenger
> http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger
>