Re: [Foucault-L] Introduction Richard Bailey

In my experience, conversation on the list waxes and wanes. Perhaps things have been relatively inactive lately, so in that sense only the list is "inactive."
But thanks for the bit about Kant.
-Nate


At 02:52 PM 6/17/2005, you wrote:
Richard Bailey wrote:
Is this list still active?

_______________________________________________
Foucault-L mailing list


EXPLAINING SILENCE

As we know Foucault translated Kant?s Anthropology.
Somewhere (AK VII, 281), Kant discusses what could be the rules
on an informal conversation, which are more or less these:
1) the conversation subject should concern everyone;

2) silence should not prevail, only short pauses are admitted;

3) so, it?s strongly recommended not to change abruptly from subject;

4) no one should intend to have the last word about the subject in discussion,
leaving in someway his assertions inconclusive;

5) and in the unavoyable case that the talk turns to a more serious subject,
one shoult control his own emotions and keep respect towards the others.

These rules aim a steady and pleasant conversation:
pleasant and not quarrelsome;
and steady so to avoid the terrible uneasiness of silence.

Kant refers here to a social and informal talk around
a table between people who share a meal (banquet).
But in our case: silence is not less uneasy.
Even if we are not exactly as few as we should
to be assembled in a "Tischgesellschaft" where,
as Foucault says in his "Introduction à l?Anthroplogie de Kant",
language is transparent.

SILENCE shows where language is coloured.

Leon Farhi Neto
_______________________________________________
Foucault-L mailing list

Have you seen the <http://www.lcurve.org/>L-Curve?
Replies
[Foucault-L] Introduction Richard Bailey, Richard Bailey
Re: [Foucault-L] Introduction Richard Bailey, Leon Farhi Neto
Partial thread listing: