Re: [Foucault-L] RE : introduction

Naïvley, may I ask: do all "social sciences" take for grant what you call
"stupid question'?
Best
Irma Ponti

Gagnon François wrote:

or maybe you want to show in your analysis how subjected subjects become agents, ie transform their objectification/subjectivation into something productive of new power-knowledge relations...

f.

________________________________

De: foucault-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx de la part de David McInerney
Date: mar. 2007-04-17 21:53
À: Mailing-list
Objet : Re: [Foucault-L] introduction



Yes but unfortunately in the "social sciences" and sociology this stupid question cannot be avoided, because it takes for granted the "agency problem" and the subject/structure opposition on which it depends.

I guess the right tack would be to show how the notion of "agency" functions as an unquestioned/unquestionable ground within sociological discourse. You might also make use of the concept of "epistemological obstacle" etc.


On 18/04/2007, at 8:24 AM, Arianna wrote:


its a stupid question, that's the answer

jataseli@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

Hello!

I´m a PhD student (MSocSc) in the Department of Social Sciences and
Philosophy at the University of Jyvaskyla in Finland.

My sociological research is about the history of drug addiction treatments
in Finland from 1960´s to present day. In this genealogical study I try
relate the changes in treatment practices to the changes of other
practices, be they discursive or non-discursive, that have made changes in
treatment practices possible. So basic foucauldian stuff.

My current interests lie in the modern concept of addiction and in the
"original" problematization that the emergence of this concept was related
to in the late 18th and early 19th century. Furthermore, being a student
of sociology I confront all the time the question "where´s the agent in
Foucault´s thought". I´ve got a kind of a answer to this question but it
needs more clarification.


Yours

Jani Selin

_______________________________________________
Foucault-L mailing list




_______________________________________________
Foucault-L mailing list



_______________________________________________
Foucault-L mailing list



------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Foucault-L mailing list


Replies
[Foucault-L] introduction, jataseli
Re: [Foucault-L] introduction, Arianna
Re: [Foucault-L] introduction, David McInerney
[Foucault-L] RE : introduction, Gagnon François
Partial thread listing: