It is just me, or anyone else thinks it is paradoxical to read all this
judgements about "Foucault thought this or that", whilst Foucault developed
the archaeological method to avoid precisely such psychological
interpretations of authors? Not only "The Archaeology of Knowledge" explains
this particularity in opposition to traditional "psychological"
interpretations in the history of ideas, but I also remember an interview he
gave where at the end he lamented about how judgemental people were and how
impossible it was to imagine a world with no judgement at all. Just a little
thought...
Frank.
judgements about "Foucault thought this or that", whilst Foucault developed
the archaeological method to avoid precisely such psychological
interpretations of authors? Not only "The Archaeology of Knowledge" explains
this particularity in opposition to traditional "psychological"
interpretations in the history of ideas, but I also remember an interview he
gave where at the end he lamented about how judgemental people were and how
impossible it was to imagine a world with no judgement at all. Just a little
thought...
Frank.