Re: [Foucault-L] Foucault-L Digest, Vol 9, Issue 21

[martin hardie <mhardie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

stop being a slave and do it yourself
http://foucault.info/mailman/listinfo/foucault-l

2009/5/23 A Yedidag <ayedidag@xxxxxxxxx>

> WOULD YOU PLEASE TAKE MY NAME OFF THIS LIST??
> HOW MANY TIMES I HAVE TO REQUEST???
>
> I DO NOT WANT TO RECEIVE ANY FURTHER MESSAGES .
> THANKS.
>
> --- On Fri, 5/22/09, foucault-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <
> foucault-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> From: foucault-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <foucault-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Foucault-L Digest, Vol 9, Issue 21
> To: foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Friday, May 22, 2009, 7:33 PM
>
>
> Send Foucault-L mailing list submissions to
>     foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>     http://foucault.info/mailman/listinfo/foucault-l
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>     foucault-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>     foucault-l-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Foucault-L digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Foucault-L Digest, Vol 9, Issue 19 (David McInerney)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 09:02:41 +0930
> From: David McInerney <vagabond@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Foucault-L Digest, Vol 9, Issue 19
> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <F0603BE4-00FD-48CA-8D32-E825E36CD951@xxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
>
> If you can't work out how to unsubscribe yourself from this list,
> then maybe internet lists aren't for you.  Every month an email comes
> around telling you how to do it.
>
>
> On 23/05/2009, at 8:52 AM, A Yedidag wrote:
>
> >
> > UNSUBSCRIBE PLEASE!!!!!!!
> >
> > --- On Fri, 5/22/09, foucault-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <foucault-l-
> > request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> > From: foucault-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <foucault-l-
> > request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Foucault-L Digest, Vol 9, Issue 19
> > To: foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Date: Friday, May 22, 2009, 12:01 PM
> >
> >
> > Send Foucault-L mailing list submissions to
> >     foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >     http://foucault.info/mailman/listinfo/foucault-l
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >     foucault-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> >     foucault-l-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of Foucault-L digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> >    1. Re: Foucault and interpretivism (Kevin Turner)
> >    2. Re: Foucault-L Digest, Vol 9, Issue 18 (amir)
> >    3. Re: Foucault-L Digest, Vol 9, Issue 18 (Matt Cunningham-Cook)
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 14:07:50 -0800
> > From: Kevin Turner <kevin.turner@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Foucault and interpretivism
> > To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Message-ID: <834A8DA03B4.00000F28kevin.turner@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> >
> > hi ian
> >
> > there is a passage from an interview foucault gave in 1967 that I
> > have taken as a kind of methodological prescription in writing my
> > thesis about foucault, which i think may be of some help in
> > addressing your question.
> >
> > the interview has the title 'on the ways of writing history,' and
> > the passage reads as follows:
> >
> > 'Instead of reconstituting the immanent secret, [criticism; k]
> > treats the text as a set of elements?among which one can bring out
> > absolutely new relations, insofar as they have not been controlled
> > by the writer?s design and are made possible only by the work
> > itself as such. The formal relations that one discovers in this way
> > are not present in anyone?s mind; they don?t constitute the latent
> > content of the statements, their discreet secret. They are a
> > construction, but an accurate construction provided that the
> > relations described can actually be assigned to the material
> > treated?[they are constructions that]?place people?s words in
> > relations that are still unformulated, said by us for the first
> > time, and yet objectively accurate' (EW2: 286-287).
> >
> > regards,
> > kevin.
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: ian.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Sent: Thu, 21 May 2009 20:38:46 +0000
> >> To: foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: [Foucault-L] Foucault and interpretivism
> >>
> >>
> >> I am fairly new to Foucauldian methods and am currently trying to
> >> understand whether the idea of interpretation has any place in using
> >> Foucault's methods. I understand that for Foucault there is no
> >> inside or
> >> outside of discourse so in using his methods it is important to aviod
> >> searching for meaning.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> My question would be, when analysing data am I just describing the
> >> practices? But then surely my descriptions are only my
> >> interpretation?
> >> From what I can see (with my noice minds eye) there is no way out of
> >> interpretation, or am I just talking about two different things?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Any feedback about this, or useful and informative pieces to read, or
> >> some general feedback on using Foucault would be much appreciated.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> Ian
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Foucault-L mailing list
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > FREE 3D EARTH SCREENSAVER - Watch the Earth right on your desktop!
> > Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/earth
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 22:08:39 +0000
> > From: "amir" <amir.mualem@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Foucault-L Digest, Vol 9, Issue 18
> > To: foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Message-ID:
> >     <1411461651-1242943717-
> > cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-279225109-
> > @bxe1073.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
> >
> > Content-Type: text/plain
> >
> >
> > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: foucault-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 03:23:49
> > To: <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Foucault-L Digest, Vol 9, Issue 18
> >
> >
> > Send Foucault-L mailing list submissions to
> >     foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >     http://foucault.info/mailman/listinfo/foucault-l
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >     foucault-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> >     foucault-l-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of Foucault-L digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> >    1. Fwd: [PL] Query re. Foucault, Heidegger, the internet
> >       (Timothy O'Leary)
> >    2. Info on foucauldian research in France (goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx)
> >    3. Re :  Info on foucauldian research in France (emmanuel pehau)
> >    4. Re: Re :  Info on foucauldian research in France
> >       (tp2277@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
> >    5. Re: Info on foucauldian research in France (David McInerney)
> >    6. Re: Info on foucauldian research in France (Chetan Vemuri)
> >    7. looking for text (Michael Maidan)
> >    8. Re: looking for text (Douglas Olena)
> >    9. Re: looking for text (Timothy O'Leary)
> >   10. Re: looking for text (Douglas Olena)
> >   11. Re: looking for text (M. Karskens)
> >   12. Re: Info on foucauldian research in France (james)
> >   13. Jules Vuillemin (Paul Taborsky)
> >   14. Re: Jules Vuillemin (pong naiyavitit)
> >   15. Using the forum (ian.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
> >   16. Foucault and interpretivism (ian.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
> >   17. Re: Foucault and interpretivism (David McInerney)
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 09:08:28 +0800
> > From: "Timothy O'Leary" <autrement@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [Foucault-L] Fwd: [PL] Query re. Foucault, Heidegger, the
> >     internet
> > To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Message-ID:
> >     <fc06d9820905101808lfb1fc05q53f86d41cc81ed34@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >
> > Dear Foucault List,
> > I am forwarding this from another philosophy list - it should get more
> > responses here.
> > Timothy
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Patience Moll <patiencemoll@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Mon, May 11, 2009 at 7:36 AM
> > Subject: [PL] Query re. Foucault, Heidegger, the internet
> > To: PHILOS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> > Dear all,
> > I have another query for a student of mine pursuing a research
> > project that
> > analyzes the implications of the internet in terms of Foucault's
> > theory of
> > biopower/biopolitics and Heidegger's writings on technology.  He is
> > trying
> > to argue that Heidegger's ontology is more successful than
> > Foucault's theory
> > of biopolitics for analyzing what is at stake, politically and
> > ethically, in
> > the development of the internet.
> >
> > If anyone knows of secondary material that directly addresses the
> > internet
> > in light of Foucault's and/or Heidegger's thinking, could you
> > please send
> > the reference to me off-list at patiencemoll@xxxxxxxxxxx?
> >
> > Thank you very much, and thanks to those who responded to my
> > earlier query
> > re. bioethics and sustainability.
> >
> > Patience Moll
> > Lecturer
> > Humanities Core Program
> > U.C. Irvine
> >
> > ------------------------------
> > Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail?. See
> > how.<http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?
> > ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_QuickAdd1_052009>
> > Messages to the list are archived at
> > http://listserv.liv.ac.uk/archives/philos-l.html. Prolonged
> > discussions
> > should be moved to chora: enrol via
> > http://listserv.liv.ac.uk/archives/chora.html. Other philosophical
> > resources
> > on the Web can be found at http://www.liv.ac.uk/pal.
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 18:36:56 +0200
> > From: <goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [Foucault-L] Info on foucauldian research in France
> > To: Foucault-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Message-ID: <11560551.1242146216491.JavaMail.root@fep-13>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was wondering if anyone could help me with the following problem:
> >
> > while browsing through post-graduate "brochures" of French
> > universities, especially that of EHESS's department of Political
> > Science (who's research centre is named Raymond Aron - I am well
> > aware of that) I could not find anyone (meaning professors) whose
> > work would primarily deal with Michel Foucault (I have browsed
> > through JSTOR, SAGE and persee.fr).
> >
> > The question is therefore the following: is the university
> > Vincennes-St.Denis ?the (only) place? in France where foucauldian
> > research is being conducted or has it become (because of it's ?
> > nature?) so dispersed that it is everywhere yet nowhere??
> >
> > If someone could direct me to some/one/place with usefull
> > information it would be greatelly appreciated.
> >
> >
> > Best Regards, Goran Gaber
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 18:26:29 +0000 (GMT)
> > From: emmanuel pehau <klossi_fr@xxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [Foucault-L] Re :  Info on foucauldian research in France
> > To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Message-ID: <751079.20364.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> >
> > Hi, Goran.
> >
> > I've been studying philosophy at Vincennes for the last two years.
> > As far as I know, it's the only place in France were foucaldian
> > studies are part of the "daily meal". (And yes, it's one of the
> > many reasons I'm there.)
> >
> > Emmanuel.
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > De : "goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx" <goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx>
> > ? : Foucault-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Envoy? le : Mardi, 12 Mai 2009, 18h36mn 56s
> > Objet : [Foucault-L] Info on foucauldian research in France
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was wondering if anyone could help me with the following problem:
> >
> > while browsing through post-graduate "brochures" of French
> > universities, especially that of EHESS's department of Political
> > Science (who's research centre is named Raymond Aron - I am well
> > aware of that) I could not find anyone (meaning professors) whose
> > work would primarily deal with Michel Foucault (I have browsed
> > through JSTOR, SAGE and persee.fr).
> >
> > The question is therefore the following: is the university
> > Vincennes-St.Denis ?the (only) place? in France where foucauldian
> > research is being conducted or has it become (because of it's ?
> > nature?) so dispersed that it is everywhere yet nowhere??
> >
> > If someone could direct me to some/one/place with usefull
> > information it would be greatelly appreciated.
> >
> >
> > Best Regards, Goran Gaber
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Foucault-L mailing list
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 4
> > Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 14:31:31 -0400
> > From: tp2277@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Re :  Info on foucauldian research in France
> > To: foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Message-ID: <20090512143131.6utxxplm8skcocsw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Content-Type: text/plain;    charset=ISO-8859-1;    DelSp="Yes";
> >     format="flowed"
> >
> > Hi, I do not know what you are looking for : a professor working on
> > foucault or a place to do your phd where there would be people working
> > on F. Anyway, you could get in touch with Frederic Gros, who is
> > teaching at Paris XII and Sciences Po and who just edited the last
> > (for now) of the courses of the college de france
> > t.
> >
> > Citando emmanuel pehau <klossi_fr@xxxxxxxx>:
> >
> >> Hi, Goran.
> >>
> >> I've been studying philosophy at Vincennes for the last two years.
> >> As far as I know, it's the only place in France were foucaldian
> >> studies are part of the "daily meal". (And yes, it's one of the many
> >>   reasons I'm there.)
> >>
> >> Emmanuel.
> >>
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >> De : "goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx" <goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx>
> >> ? : Foucault-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Envoy? le : Mardi, 12 Mai 2009, 18h36mn 56s
> >> Objet : [Foucault-L] Info on foucauldian research in France
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I was wondering if anyone could help me with the following problem:
> >>
> >> while browsing through post-graduate "brochures" of French
> >> universities, especially that of EHESS's department of Political
> >> Science (who's research centre is named Raymond Aron - I am well
> >> aware of that) I could not find anyone (meaning professors) whose
> >> work would primarily deal with Michel Foucault (I have browsed
> >> through JSTOR, SAGE and persee.fr).
> >>
> >> The question is therefore the following: is the university
> >> Vincennes-St.Denis ?the (only) place? in France where foucauldian
> >> research is being conducted or has it become (because of it's
> >> ?nature?) so dispersed that it is everywhere yet nowhere??
> >>
> >> If someone could direct me to some/one/place with usefull
> >> information it would be greatelly appreciated.
> >>
> >>
> >> Best Regards, Goran Gaber
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Foucault-L mailing list
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Foucault-L mailing list
> >
> >
> >
> > Teresa Pullano
> > Sciences Po Paris
> > Fulbright-Schuman Postdoctoral Fellow
> > Department of Political Science
> > Columbia University
> > New York
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 5
> > Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 07:28:10 +0930
> > From: David McInerney <vagabond@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Info on foucauldian research in France
> > To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Message-ID: <BD124F2C-589F-4D30-8655-4A738A01A952@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; delsp=yes;
> >     format=flowed
> >
> > This is an interesting problem.
> >
> > You would perhaps be best to speak to someone in France about it.
> > I'm not sure that there are people in France who spend their whole
> > lives studying Foucault - perhaps he's just not that exotic to
> > them?   Pierre Macherey for example has written important essays
> > Foucault, but his main interest is in Spinoza, and he seems to have
> > written at least as much on Canguilhem (who I believe supervised both
> > him and Foucault) as on Foucault.  He is retired now but maybe
> > someone at his university (Lille III) is also working on Foucault.
> > If you are comfortable speaking and writing in French you might try
> > there.  I know of at least two people from English-speaking countries
> > who studied there with him in the 1990s.
> >
> > Here's his website: http://stl.recherche.univ-lille3.fr/
> > sitespersonnels/macherey/accueilmacherey.html
> >
> >
> > On 13/05/2009, at 2:06 AM, <goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I was wondering if anyone could help me with the following problem:
> >>
> >> while browsing through post-graduate "brochures" of French
> >> universities, especially that of EHESS's department of Political
> >> Science (who's research centre is named Raymond Aron - I am well
> >> aware of that) I could not find anyone (meaning professors) whose
> >> work would primarily deal with Michel Foucault (I have browsed
> >> through JSTOR, SAGE and persee.fr).
> >>
> >> The question is therefore the following: is the university
> >> Vincennes-St.Denis ?the (only) place? in France where foucauldian
> >> research is being conducted or has it become (because of it's
> >> ?nature?) so dispersed that it is everywhere yet nowhere??
> >>
> >> If someone could direct me to some/one/place with usefull
> >> information it would be greatelly appreciated.
> >>
> >>
> >> Best Regards, Goran Gaber
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Foucault-L mailing list
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 6
> > Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 17:40:46 -0500
> > From: Chetan Vemuri <aryavartacnsrn@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Info on foucauldian research in France
> > To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Message-ID:
> >     <34cd98ba0905121540l232d735bgd5eb80eed6130c2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
> >
> > University of Paris VII (I think that's it?) has Frederic Gros,
> > who  has
> > edited and transcribed the lectures for 82, 83 and 84. A respected
> > French
> > scholar on Foucault.
> > There is also Michel Senellart, but I forget where he works.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 4:58 PM, David McInerney
> > <vagabond@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> This is an interesting problem.
> >>
> >> You would perhaps be best to speak to someone in France about it.
> >> I'm not sure that there are people in France who spend their whole
> >> lives studying Foucault - perhaps he's just not that exotic to
> >> them?   Pierre Macherey for example has written important essays
> >> Foucault, but his main interest is in Spinoza, and he seems to have
> >> written at least as much on Canguilhem (who I believe supervised both
> >> him and Foucault) as on Foucault.  He is retired now but maybe
> >> someone at his university (Lille III) is also working on Foucault.
> >> If you are comfortable speaking and writing in French you might try
> >> there.  I know of at least two people from English-speaking countries
> >> who studied there with him in the 1990s.
> >>
> >> Here's his website: http://stl.recherche.univ-lille3.fr/
> >> sitespersonnels/macherey/accueilmacherey.html
> >>
> >>
> >> On 13/05/2009, at 2:06 AM, <goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I was wondering if anyone could help me with the following problem:
> >>>
> >>> while browsing through post-graduate "brochures" of French
> >>> universities, especially that of EHESS's department of Political
> >>> Science (who's research centre is named Raymond Aron - I am well
> >>> aware of that) I could not find anyone (meaning professors) whose
> >>> work would primarily deal with Michel Foucault (I have browsed
> >>> through JSTOR, SAGE and persee.fr).
> >>>
> >>> The question is therefore the following: is the university
> >>> Vincennes-St.Denis ?the (only) place? in France where foucauldian
> >>> research is being conducted or has it become (because of it's
> >>> ?nature?) so dispersed that it is everywhere yet nowhere??
> >>>
> >>> If someone could direct me to some/one/place with usefull
> >>> information it would be greatelly appreciated.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Best Regards, Goran Gaber
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Foucault-L mailing list
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Foucault-L mailing list
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Chetan Vemuri
> > West Des Moines, IA
> > aryavartacnsrn@xxxxxxxxx
> > (319)-512-9318
> > "You say you want a Revolution! Well you know, we all want to
> > change the
> > world"
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 7
> > Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 17:44:08 -0400
> > From: Michael Maidan <michael.maidan@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [Foucault-L] looking for text
> > To: foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Message-ID:
> >     <b7a8c9f40905131444m714b9b3fl85848279c462e611@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> >
> > Dear members of Foucault List,
> >
> >
> >
> > I am looking for the following text:
> >
> > *Foucault,  Qu'est-ce que la critique ? (Critique et Aufkl?rung),
> > Bulletin
> > de la societe franciase de philosophie, **n?1990 84 2
> > This is the text F's conference in 1978. is not in DE.
> >
> > Thanks for your asistance.
> >
> > Rgds,
> >
> >
> > Michael Maidan
> >
> > *
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 8
> > Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 18:04:35 -0500
> > From: Douglas Olena <doug@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] looking for text
> > To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Message-ID: <160E2F4C-3C30-4CCD-AED3-C944E1D7F84B@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Content-Type: text/plain;    charset=ISO-8859-1;
> > format=flowed;    delsp=yes
> >
> > There is a reference to the essay in michel-foucault-archives
> > http://www.michel-foucault-archives.org/spip.php?
> > rubrique7&id_article=44
> > during mai. But I can't find it in Dits et ?crits for 1978.
> >
> > An English translation can be found in Semiotext(e) The Politics of
> > Truth.
> >
> > Doug
> >
> > ------------------------
> > Douglas F. Olena
> > doug@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://olena.com/wordpress1/
> > ------------------------
> >
> > On May 13, 2009, at 4:44 PM, Michael Maidan wrote:
> >
> >> Qu'est-ce que la critique
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 9
> > Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 09:21:35 +0800
> > From: "Timothy O'Leary" <autrement@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] looking for text
> > To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Message-ID:
> >     <fc06d9820905131821m31c52f5by8c8f3dc2c507cf0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >
> > Dear Michael,
> >
> > as far as I know, the only French publication of that text is still
> > the
> > original from 1990 in the Bulletin...
> >
> > It's well worth trying to get a copy of this (through inter-library
> > loan?),
> > as it contains a transcript of the Q&A session after the talk that
> > is not in
> > the English translation (unless it's in the new Semiotext(e)
> > edition?).
> >
> > Timothy
> >
> >
> > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:44 AM, Michael Maidan
> > <michael.maidan@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> >
> >> Dear members of Foucault List,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I am looking for the following text:
> >>
> >> *Foucault,  Qu'est-ce que la critique ? (Critique et Aufkl?rung),
> >> Bulletin
> >> de la societe franciase de philosophie, **n?1990 84 2
> >> This is the text F's conference in 1978. is not in DE.
> >>
> >> Thanks for your asistance.
> >>
> >> Rgds,
> >>
> >>
> >> Michael Maidan
> >>
> >> *
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Foucault-L mailing list
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 10
> > Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 20:27:19 -0500
> > From: Douglas Olena <doug@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] looking for text
> > To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Message-ID: <CE8D1BC1-1B41-4CEB-9E13-793AE0C46A13@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes
> >
> > the Q&A is in the Semiotext(e) English edition
> >
> > Doug
> >
> > ------------------------
> > Douglas F. Olena
> > doug@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://olena.com/wordpress1/
> > ------------------------
> >
> > On May 13, 2009, at 8:21 PM, Timothy O'Leary wrote:
> >
> >> Dear Michael,
> >>
> >> as far as I know, the only French publication of that text is still
> >> the
> >> original from 1990 in the Bulletin...
> >>
> >> It's well worth trying to get a copy of this (through inter-library
> >> loan?),
> >> as it contains a transcript of the Q&A session after the talk that
> >> is not in
> >> the English translation (unless it's in the new Semiotext(e)
> >> edition?).
> >>
> >> Timothy
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:44 AM, Michael Maidan
> >> <michael.maidan@xxxxxxxxx
> >>> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Dear members of Foucault List,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I am looking for the following text:
> >>>
> >>> *Foucault,  Qu'est-ce que la critique ? (Critique et Aufkl?rung),
> >>> Bulletin
> >>> de la societe franciase de philosophie, **n?1990 84 2
> >>> This is the text F's conference in 1978. is not in DE.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for your asistance.
> >>>
> >>> Rgds,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Michael Maidan
> >>>
> >>> *
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Foucault-L mailing list
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Foucault-L mailing list
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 11
> > Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 12:09:37 +0200
> > From: "M. Karskens" <mkarskens@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] looking for text
> > To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Message-ID: <20090514100932.F4118C7096@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed
> >
> > a complete English translation of the conference
> > and the discussion can be found in The
> > Political  ed. David Ingram, Blackwell 2002, pp. 191-211.
> >
> > yours
> > machiel karskens
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >     At 23:44 13-5-2009, you wrote:
> >> Dear members of Foucault List, I am looking for
> >> the following text: *Foucault,  Qu'est-ce que la
> >> critique ? (Critique et Aufkl??rung), Bulletin
> >> de la societe franciase de philosophie,
> >> **n??1990 84 2 This is the text F's conference
> >> in 1978. is not in DE. Thanks for your
> >> asistance. Rgds, Michael Maidan *
> >> _______________________________________________ Foucault-L mailing
> >> list
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Prof. Machiel Karskens
> > social and political philosophy
> > Faculty of Philosophy
> > Radboud University Nijmegen - The Netherlands
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 12
> > Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 15:13:55 -0400
> > From: james <spatium@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Info on foucauldian research in France
> > To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Message-ID:
> >     <c74774220905161213i4947cb2o6d293934adc10b67@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
> >
> > Michel Senellart was at ENS-LSH in Lyon last time I was there.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Chetan Vemuri
> > <aryavartacnsrn@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> >
> >> University of Paris VII (I think that's it?) has Frederic Gros,
> >> who  has
> >> edited and transcribed the lectures for 82, 83 and 84. A respected
> >> French
> >> scholar on Foucault.
> >> There is also Michel Senellart, but I forget where he works.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 4:58 PM, David McInerney <vagabond@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> This is an interesting problem.
> >>>
> >>> You would perhaps be best to speak to someone in France about it.
> >>> I'm not sure that there are people in France who spend their whole
> >>> lives studying Foucault - perhaps he's just not that exotic to
> >>> them?   Pierre Macherey for example has written important essays
> >>> Foucault, but his main interest is in Spinoza, and he seems to have
> >>> written at least as much on Canguilhem (who I believe supervised
> >>> both
> >>> him and Foucault) as on Foucault.  He is retired now but maybe
> >>> someone at his university (Lille III) is also working on Foucault.
> >>> If you are comfortable speaking and writing in French you might try
> >>> there.  I know of at least two people from English-speaking
> >>> countries
> >>> who studied there with him in the 1990s.
> >>>
> >>> Here's his website: http://stl.recherche.univ-lille3.fr/
> >>> sitespersonnels/macherey/accueilmacherey.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 13/05/2009, at 2:06 AM, <goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hello,
> >>>>
> >>>> I was wondering if anyone could help me with the following problem:
> >>>>
> >>>> while browsing through post-graduate "brochures" of French
> >>>> universities, especially that of EHESS's department of Political
> >>>> Science (who's research centre is named Raymond Aron - I am well
> >>>> aware of that) I could not find anyone (meaning professors) whose
> >>>> work would primarily deal with Michel Foucault (I have browsed
> >>>> through JSTOR, SAGE and persee.fr).
> >>>>
> >>>> The question is therefore the following: is the university
> >>>> Vincennes-St.Denis ?the (only) place? in France where foucauldian
> >>>> research is being conducted or has it become (because of it's
> >>>> ?nature?) so dispersed that it is everywhere yet nowhere??
> >>>>
> >>>> If someone could direct me to some/one/place with usefull
> >>>> information it would be greatelly appreciated.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Best Regards, Goran Gaber
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Foucault-L mailing list
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Foucault-L mailing list
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Chetan Vemuri
> >> West Des Moines, IA
> >> aryavartacnsrn@xxxxxxxxx
> >> (319)-512-9318
> >> "You say you want a Revolution! Well you know, we all want to
> >> change the
> >> world"
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Foucault-L mailing list
> >>
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 13
> > Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 19:28:11 -0700 (PDT)
> > From: Paul Taborsky <pdtaborsky@xxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [Foucault-L] Jules Vuillemin
> > To: foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Message-ID: <564631.80496.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> >
> > I have been reading Jules Vuillemin's 'L'Heritage Kantienne et la
> > revolution copernicienne: Fichte - Cohen - Heidegger', (1954), and
> > it is obvious that a great deal of Foucault's ideas about the post-
> > Kantian epistemological framework must have been influenced by this
> > work. Yet nowhere do I recall Foucault acknowledging his influence.
> > Is Vuillemin's influence on Foucault well known? If not, it
> > certainly should be, for it strikes me that, at least for his
> > early, 'archaeological' work, this book is as least as important
> > as, if not more important than, the other usual sources of
> > influence that are often cited, such as Canguilhem.
> >
> > Paul Taborsky, Zheng Li Shiji Dasha, Suite 1106, 199 Laodong Xilu,
> > Changsha, Hunan, 410002 China.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________________________
> > Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk
> > email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail.  Click on Options in
> > Mail and switch to New Mail today or register for free at http://
> > mail.yahoo.ca
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 14
> > Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 21:09:29 -0700 (PDT)
> > From: pong naiyavitit <pongn@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Jules Vuillemin
> > To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Message-ID: <982703.49737.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> >
> >
> > wiki.fr claims that Vuillemin is a friend of Foucault, and they
> > also discussed each other while Foucault worked on OT.
> >
> > http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jules_Vuillemin
> >
> > That's what I know
> >
> > pong
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- On Tue, 5/19/09, Paul Taborsky <pdtaborsky@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: Paul Taborsky <pdtaborsky@xxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [Foucault-L] Jules Vuillemin
> > To: foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 9:28 AM
> >
> > I have been reading Jules Vuillemin's 'L'Heritage Kantienne et la
> > revolution copernicienne: Fichte - Cohen - Heidegger', (1954), and
> > it is obvious that a great deal of Foucault's ideas about the post-
> > Kantian epistemological framework must have been influenced by this
> > work. Yet nowhere do I recall Foucault acknowledging his influence.
> > Is Vuillemin's influence on Foucault well known? If not, it
> > certainly should be, for it strikes me that, at least for his
> > early, 'archaeological' work, this book is as least as important
> > as, if not more important than, the other usual sources of
> > influence that are often cited, such as Canguilhem.
> >
> > Paul Taborsky, Zheng Li Shiji Dasha, Suite 1106, 199 Laodong Xilu,
> > Changsha, Hunan, 410002 China.
> >
> >
> >
> > ? ? ?
> > __________________________________________________________________
> > Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk
> > email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail.? Click on Options in
> > Mail and switch to New Mail today or register for free at http://
> > mail.yahoo.ca
> > _______________________________________________
> > Foucault-L mailing list
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 15
> > Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 20:30:32 +0000
> > From: <ian.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [Foucault-L] Using the forum
> > To: <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Message-ID: <BLU121-W27D896CACF04D2D581F595E5590@xxxxxxx>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >
> >
> > I have just subscribed to the forum/notice board and and replying
> > in order to start leaving messages on the board.
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 16
> > Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 20:38:46 +0000
> > From: <ian.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [Foucault-L] Foucault and interpretivism
> > To: <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Message-ID: <BLU121-W668A98A839C590243043AE5590@xxxxxxx>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >
> >
> > I am fairly new to Foucauldian methods and am currently trying to
> > understand whether the idea of interpretation has any place in
> > using Foucault's methods. I understand that for Foucault there is
> > no inside or outside of discourse so in using his methods it is
> > important to aviod searching for meaning.
> >
> >
> >
> > My question would be, when analysing data am I just describing the
> > practices? But then surely my descriptions are only my
> > interpretation? From what I can see (with my noice minds eye) there
> > is no way out of interpretation, or am I just talking about two
> > different things?
> >
> >
> >
> > Any feedback about this, or useful and informative pieces to read,
> > or some general feedback on using Foucault would be much appreciated.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Ian
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 17
> > Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 07:23:51 +0930
> > From: David McInerney <vagabond@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Foucault and interpretivism
> > To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Message-ID: <4D3493A2-981B-412E-B919-4233F9A9BFDD@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
> >
> > Welcome to the list Ian.
> >
> > I was reading something the other day that discussed this issue.
> >
> > I think it might have been Dominick LaCapra's History and Reading:
> > Tocqueville, Foucault, French Studies (University of Toronto Press,
> > 2000).  You might start there.
> >
> > You are right to assume that Foucault generally avoids searching for
> > a meaning 'underneath' or 'behind' discourse in that hermeneutical
> > sense, but I'm not sure how explicit he is about a lot of that.  It
> > seems to be more a general feature of his work, rather than something
> > he intervenes on repeatedly.  For that kind of thing you might get
> > something more sustained in Deleuze, Althusser, or Macherey.  The
> > points where their positions on this intersect with those of Derrida
> > perhaps indicate a general doxa - obviously there are divergences
> > between all of these thinkers that are distinctive and mark out their
> > different and opposed positions on certain points, but there is
> > something to be gained by considering their shared assumptions, which
> > indicate the shared terrain on which their disagreements play out.
> >
> > Unless someone can suggest a better alternative I'd say LaCapra's
> > book's not a bad place to start.
> >
> > DM
> >
> >
> > On 22/05/2009, at 6:08 AM, <ian.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> I am fairly new to Foucauldian methods and am currently trying to
> >> understand whether the idea of interpretation has any place in
> >> using Foucault's methods. I understand that for Foucault there is
> >> no inside or outside of discourse so in using his methods it is
> >> important to aviod searching for meaning.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> My question would be, when analysing data am I just describing the
> >> practices? But then surely my descriptions are only my
> >> interpretation? From what I can see (with my noice minds eye) there
> >> is no way out of interpretation, or am I just talking about two
> >> different things?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Any feedback about this, or useful and informative pieces to read,
> >> or some general feedback on using Foucault would be much appreciated.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> Ian
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Foucault-L mailing list
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Foucault-L mailing list
> > Foucault-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > http://foucault.info/mailman/listinfo/foucault-l
> >
> > End of Foucault-L Digest, Vol 9, Issue 18
> > *****************************************
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 09:42:07 -0600
> > From: Matt Cunningham-Cook <m.cunninghamcook@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Foucault-L Digest, Vol 9, Issue 18
> > To: foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Message-ID:
> >     <24107e3e0905220842u70407d46r6d1047bf75da487e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >
> > Hi I've been looking for Jason Weidner's email address- I'd like to
> > talk to
> > him about his call for papers on Foucault and Civil Society- I was
> > wondering
> > if he could shoot me a quick email, or if someone could send me his
> > email?
> >
> > Thanks so much,
> > Matthew
> >
> > On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 3:53 PM, <foucault-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Send Foucault-L mailing list submissions to
> >>         foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >>         http://foucault.info/mailman/listinfo/foucault-l
> >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >>         foucault-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >> You can reach the person managing the list at
> >>         foucault-l-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> >> than "Re: Contents of Foucault-L digest..."
> >>
> >>
> >> Today's Topics:
> >>
> >>    1. Fwd: [PL] Query re. Foucault, Heidegger, the internet
> >>       (Timothy O'Leary)
> >>    2. Info on foucauldian research in France (goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx)
> >>    3. Re :  Info on foucauldian research in France (emmanuel pehau)
> >>    4. Re: Re :  Info on foucauldian research in France
> >>       (tp2277@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
> >>    5. Re: Info on foucauldian research in France (David McInerney)
> >>    6. Re: Info on foucauldian research in France (Chetan Vemuri)
> >>    7. looking for text (Michael Maidan)
> >>    8. Re: looking for text (Douglas Olena)
> >>    9. Re: looking for text (Timothy O'Leary)
> >>   10. Re: looking for text (Douglas Olena)
> >>   11. Re: looking for text (M. Karskens)
> >>   12. Re: Info on foucauldian research in France (james)
> >>   13. Jules Vuillemin (Paul Taborsky)
> >>   14. Re: Jules Vuillemin (pong naiyavitit)
> >>   15. Using the forum (ian.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
> >>   16. Foucault and interpretivism (ian.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
> >>   17. Re: Foucault and interpretivism (David McInerney)
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> -
> >>
> >> Message: 1
> >> Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 09:08:28 +0800
> >> From: "Timothy O'Leary" <autrement@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Subject: [Foucault-L] Fwd: [PL] Query re. Foucault, Heidegger, the
> >>         internet
> >> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Message-ID:
> >>         <fc06d9820905101808lfb1fc05q53f86d41cc81ed34@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >>
> >> Dear Foucault List,
> >> I am forwarding this from another philosophy list - it should get
> >> more
> >> responses here.
> >> Timothy
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >> From: Patience Moll <patiencemoll@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Date: Mon, May 11, 2009 at 7:36 AM
> >> Subject: [PL] Query re. Foucault, Heidegger, the internet
> >> To: PHILOS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >>
> >>   Dear all,
> >> I have another query for a student of mine pursuing a research
> >> project that
> >> analyzes the implications of the internet in terms of Foucault's
> >> theory of
> >> biopower/biopolitics and Heidegger's writings on technology.  He
> >> is trying
> >> to argue that Heidegger's ontology is more successful than Foucault's
> >> theory
> >> of biopolitics for analyzing what is at stake, politically and
> >> ethically,
> >> in
> >> the development of the internet.
> >>
> >> If anyone knows of secondary material that directly addresses the
> >> internet
> >> in light of Foucault's and/or Heidegger's thinking, could you
> >> please send
> >> the reference to me off-list at patiencemoll@xxxxxxxxxxx?
> >>
> >> Thank you very much, and thanks to those who responded to my
> >> earlier query
> >> re. bioethics and sustainability.
> >>
> >> Patience Moll
> >> Lecturer
> >> Humanities Core Program
> >> U.C. Irvine
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >> Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail?. See
> >> how.<
> >> http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?
> >> ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_QuickAdd1_052009
> >>>
> >> Messages to the list are archived at
> >> http://listserv.liv.ac.uk/archives/philos-l.html. Prolonged
> >> discussions
> >> should be moved to chora: enrol via
> >> http://listserv.liv.ac.uk/archives/chora.html. Other philosophical
> >> resources
> >> on the Web can be found at http://www.liv.ac.uk/pal.
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 2
> >> Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 18:36:56 +0200
> >> From: <goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx>
> >> Subject: [Foucault-L] Info on foucauldian research in France
> >> To: Foucault-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Message-ID: <11560551.1242146216491.JavaMail.root@fep-13>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I was wondering if anyone could help me with the following problem:
> >>
> >> while browsing through post-graduate "brochures" of French
> >> universities,
> >> especially that of EHESS's department of Political Science (who's
> >> research
> >> centre is named Raymond Aron - I am well aware of that) I could
> >> not find
> >> anyone (meaning professors) whose work would primarily deal with
> >> Michel
> >> Foucault (I have browsed through JSTOR, SAGE and persee.fr).
> >>
> >> The question is therefore the following: is the university
> >> Vincennes-St.Denis ?the (only) place? in France where foucauldian
> >> research
> >> is being conducted or has it become (because of it's ?nature?) so
> >> dispersed
> >> that it is everywhere yet nowhere??
> >>
> >> If someone could direct me to some/one/place with usefull
> >> information it
> >> would be greatelly appreciated.
> >>
> >>
> >> Best Regards, Goran Gaber
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 3
> >> Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 18:26:29 +0000 (GMT)
> >> From: emmanuel pehau <klossi_fr@xxxxxxxx>
> >> Subject: [Foucault-L] Re :  Info on foucauldian research in France
> >> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Message-ID: <751079.20364.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> >>
> >> Hi, Goran.
> >>
> >> I've been studying philosophy at Vincennes for the last two years.
> >> As far
> >> as I know, it's the only place in France were foucaldian studies
> >> are part of
> >> the "daily meal". (And yes, it's one of the many reasons I'm there.)
> >>
> >> Emmanuel.
> >>
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >> De : "goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx" <goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx>
> >> ? : Foucault-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Envoy? le : Mardi, 12 Mai 2009, 18h36mn 56s
> >> Objet : [Foucault-L] Info on foucauldian research in France
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I was wondering if anyone could help me with the following problem:
> >>
> >> while browsing through post-graduate "brochures" of French
> >> universities,
> >> especially that of EHESS's department of Political Science (who's
> >> research
> >> centre is named Raymond Aron - I am well aware of that) I could
> >> not find
> >> anyone (meaning professors) whose work would primarily deal with
> >> Michel
> >> Foucault (I have browsed through JSTOR, SAGE and persee.fr).
> >>
> >> The question is therefore the following: is the university
> >> Vincennes-St.Denis ?the (only) place? in France where foucauldian
> >> research
> >> is being conducted or has it become (because of it's ?nature?) so
> >> dispersed
> >> that it is everywhere yet nowhere??
> >>
> >> If someone could direct me to some/one/place with usefull
> >> information it
> >> would be greatelly appreciated.
> >>
> >>
> >> Best Regards, Goran Gaber
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Foucault-L mailing list
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 4
> >> Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 14:31:31 -0400
> >> From: tp2277@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Re :  Info on foucauldian research in
> >> France
> >> To: foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Message-ID: <20090512143131.6utxxplm8skcocsw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset=ISO-8859-1;     DelSp="Yes";
> >>         format="flowed"
> >>
> >> Hi, I do not know what you are looking for : a professor working on
> >> foucault or a place to do your phd where there would be people
> >> working
> >> on F. Anyway, you could get in touch with Frederic Gros, who is
> >> teaching at Paris XII and Sciences Po and who just edited the last
> >> (for now) of the courses of the college de france
> >> t.
> >>
> >> Citando emmanuel pehau <klossi_fr@xxxxxxxx>:
> >>
> >>> Hi, Goran.
> >>>
> >>> I've been studying philosophy at Vincennes for the last two years.
> >>> As far as I know, it's the only place in France were foucaldian
> >>> studies are part of the "daily meal". (And yes, it's one of the many
> >>>   reasons I'm there.)
> >>>
> >>> Emmanuel.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ________________________________
> >>> De : "goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx" <goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx>
> >>> ? : Foucault-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> Envoy? le : Mardi, 12 Mai 2009, 18h36mn 56s
> >>> Objet : [Foucault-L] Info on foucauldian research in France
> >>>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I was wondering if anyone could help me with the following problem:
> >>>
> >>> while browsing through post-graduate "brochures" of French
> >>> universities, especially that of EHESS's department of Political
> >>> Science (who's research centre is named Raymond Aron - I am well
> >>> aware of that) I could not find anyone (meaning professors) whose
> >>> work would primarily deal with Michel Foucault (I have browsed
> >>> through JSTOR, SAGE and persee.fr).
> >>>
> >>> The question is therefore the following: is the university
> >>> Vincennes-St.Denis ?the (only) place? in France where foucauldian
> >>> research is being conducted or has it become (because of it's
> >>> ?nature?) so dispersed that it is everywhere yet nowhere??
> >>>
> >>> If someone could direct me to some/one/place with usefull
> >>> information it would be greatelly appreciated.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Best Regards, Goran Gaber
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Foucault-L mailing list
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Foucault-L mailing list
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Teresa Pullano
> >> Sciences Po Paris
> >> Fulbright-Schuman Postdoctoral Fellow
> >> Department of Political Science
> >> Columbia University
> >> New York
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 5
> >> Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 07:28:10 +0930
> >> From: David McInerney <vagabond@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Info on foucauldian research in France
> >> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Message-ID: <BD124F2C-589F-4D30-8655-4A738A01A952@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; delsp=yes;
> >>         format=flowed
> >>
> >> This is an interesting problem.
> >>
> >> You would perhaps be best to speak to someone in France about it.
> >> I'm not sure that there are people in France who spend their whole
> >> lives studying Foucault - perhaps he's just not that exotic to
> >> them?   Pierre Macherey for example has written important essays
> >> Foucault, but his main interest is in Spinoza, and he seems to have
> >> written at least as much on Canguilhem (who I believe supervised both
> >> him and Foucault) as on Foucault.  He is retired now but maybe
> >> someone at his university (Lille III) is also working on Foucault.
> >> If you are comfortable speaking and writing in French you might try
> >> there.  I know of at least two people from English-speaking countries
> >> who studied there with him in the 1990s.
> >>
> >> Here's his website: http://stl.recherche.univ-lille3.fr/
> >> sitespersonnels/macherey/accueilmacherey.html
> >>
> >>
> >> On 13/05/2009, at 2:06 AM, <goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I was wondering if anyone could help me with the following problem:
> >>>
> >>> while browsing through post-graduate "brochures" of French
> >>> universities, especially that of EHESS's department of Political
> >>> Science (who's research centre is named Raymond Aron - I am well
> >>> aware of that) I could not find anyone (meaning professors) whose
> >>> work would primarily deal with Michel Foucault (I have browsed
> >>> through JSTOR, SAGE and persee.fr).
> >>>
> >>> The question is therefore the following: is the university
> >>> Vincennes-St.Denis ?the (only) place? in France where foucauldian
> >>> research is being conducted or has it become (because of it's
> >>> ?nature?) so dispersed that it is everywhere yet nowhere??
> >>>
> >>> If someone could direct me to some/one/place with usefull
> >>> information it would be greatelly appreciated.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Best Regards, Goran Gaber
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Foucault-L mailing list
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 6
> >> Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 17:40:46 -0500
> >> From: Chetan Vemuri <aryavartacnsrn@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Info on foucauldian research in France
> >> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Message-ID:
> >>         <34cd98ba0905121540l232d735bgd5eb80eed6130c2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
> >>
> >> University of Paris VII (I think that's it?) has Frederic Gros,
> >> who  has
> >> edited and transcribed the lectures for 82, 83 and 84. A respected
> >> French
> >> scholar on Foucault.
> >> There is also Michel Senellart, but I forget where he works.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 4:58 PM, David McInerney <vagabond@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> This is an interesting problem.
> >>>
> >>> You would perhaps be best to speak to someone in France about it.
> >>> I'm not sure that there are people in France who spend their whole
> >>> lives studying Foucault - perhaps he's just not that exotic to
> >>> them?   Pierre Macherey for example has written important essays
> >>> Foucault, but his main interest is in Spinoza, and he seems to have
> >>> written at least as much on Canguilhem (who I believe supervised
> >>> both
> >>> him and Foucault) as on Foucault.  He is retired now but maybe
> >>> someone at his university (Lille III) is also working on Foucault.
> >>> If you are comfortable speaking and writing in French you might try
> >>> there.  I know of at least two people from English-speaking
> >>> countries
> >>> who studied there with him in the 1990s.
> >>>
> >>> Here's his website: http://stl.recherche.univ-lille3.fr/
> >>> sitespersonnels/macherey/accueilmacherey.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 13/05/2009, at 2:06 AM, <goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hello,
> >>>>
> >>>> I was wondering if anyone could help me with the following problem:
> >>>>
> >>>> while browsing through post-graduate "brochures" of French
> >>>> universities, especially that of EHESS's department of Political
> >>>> Science (who's research centre is named Raymond Aron - I am well
> >>>> aware of that) I could not find anyone (meaning professors) whose
> >>>> work would primarily deal with Michel Foucault (I have browsed
> >>>> through JSTOR, SAGE and persee.fr).
> >>>>
> >>>> The question is therefore the following: is the university
> >>>> Vincennes-St.Denis ?the (only) place? in France where foucauldian
> >>>> research is being conducted or has it become (because of it's
> >>>> ?nature?) so dispersed that it is everywhere yet nowhere??
> >>>>
> >>>> If someone could direct me to some/one/place with usefull
> >>>> information it would be greatelly appreciated.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Best Regards, Goran Gaber
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Foucault-L mailing list
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Foucault-L mailing list
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Chetan Vemuri
> >> West Des Moines, IA
> >> aryavartacnsrn@xxxxxxxxx
> >> (319)-512-9318
> >> "You say you want a Revolution! Well you know, we all want to
> >> change the
> >> world"
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 7
> >> Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 17:44:08 -0400
> >> From: Michael Maidan <michael.maidan@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Subject: [Foucault-L] looking for text
> >> To: foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Message-ID:
> >>         <b7a8c9f40905131444m714b9b3fl85848279c462e611@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> >>
> >> Dear members of Foucault List,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I am looking for the following text:
> >>
> >> *Foucault,  Qu'est-ce que la critique ? (Critique et Aufkl?rung),
> >> Bulletin
> >> de la societe franciase de philosophie, **n?1990 84 2
> >> This is the text F's conference in 1978. is not in DE.
> >>
> >> Thanks for your asistance.
> >>
> >> Rgds,
> >>
> >>
> >> Michael Maidan
> >>
> >> *
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 8
> >> Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 18:04:35 -0500
> >> From: Douglas Olena <doug@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] looking for text
> >> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Message-ID: <160E2F4C-3C30-4CCD-AED3-C944E1D7F84B@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset=ISO-8859-1;
> >> format=flowed;
> >>   delsp=yes
> >>
> >> There is a reference to the essay in michel-foucault-archives
> >> http://www.michel-foucault-archives.org/spip.php?
> >> rubrique7&id_article=44
> >> during mai. But I can't find it in Dits et ?crits for 1978.
> >>
> >> An English translation can be found in Semiotext(e) The Politics of
> >> Truth.
> >>
> >> Doug
> >>
> >> ------------------------
> >> Douglas F. Olena
> >> doug@xxxxxxxxx
> >> http://olena.com/wordpress1/
> >> ------------------------
> >>
> >> On May 13, 2009, at 4:44 PM, Michael Maidan wrote:
> >>
> >>> Qu'est-ce que la critique
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 9
> >> Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 09:21:35 +0800
> >> From: "Timothy O'Leary" <autrement@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] looking for text
> >> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Message-ID:
> >>         <fc06d9820905131821m31c52f5by8c8f3dc2c507cf0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >>
> >> Dear Michael,
> >>
> >> as far as I know, the only French publication of that text is
> >> still the
> >> original from 1990 in the Bulletin...
> >>
> >> It's well worth trying to get a copy of this (through inter-
> >> library loan?),
> >> as it contains a transcript of the Q&A session after the talk that
> >> is not
> >> in
> >> the English translation (unless it's in the new Semiotext(e)
> >> edition?).
> >>
> >> Timothy
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:44 AM, Michael Maidan
> >> <michael.maidan@xxxxxxxxx
> >>> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Dear members of Foucault List,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I am looking for the following text:
> >>>
> >>> *Foucault,  Qu'est-ce que la critique ? (Critique et Aufkl?rung),
> >> Bulletin
> >>> de la societe franciase de philosophie, **n?1990 84 2
> >>> This is the text F's conference in 1978. is not in DE.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for your asistance.
> >>>
> >>> Rgds,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Michael Maidan
> >>>
> >>> *
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Foucault-L mailing list
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 10
> >> Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 20:27:19 -0500
> >> From: Douglas Olena <doug@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] looking for text
> >> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Message-ID: <CE8D1BC1-1B41-4CEB-9E13-793AE0C46A13@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed;
> >> delsp=yes
> >>
> >> the Q&A is in the Semiotext(e) English edition
> >>
> >> Doug
> >>
> >> ------------------------
> >> Douglas F. Olena
> >> doug@xxxxxxxxx
> >> http://olena.com/wordpress1/
> >> ------------------------
> >>
> >> On May 13, 2009, at 8:21 PM, Timothy O'Leary wrote:
> >>
> >>> Dear Michael,
> >>>
> >>> as far as I know, the only French publication of that text is still
> >>> the
> >>> original from 1990 in the Bulletin...
> >>>
> >>> It's well worth trying to get a copy of this (through inter-library
> >>> loan?),
> >>> as it contains a transcript of the Q&A session after the talk that
> >>> is not in
> >>> the English translation (unless it's in the new Semiotext(e)
> >>> edition?).
> >>>
> >>> Timothy
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:44 AM, Michael Maidan <
> >> michael.maidan@xxxxxxxxx
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Dear members of Foucault List,
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I am looking for the following text:
> >>>>
> >>>> *Foucault,  Qu'est-ce que la critique ? (Critique et Aufkl?rung),
> >>>> Bulletin
> >>>> de la societe franciase de philosophie, **n?1990 84 2
> >>>> This is the text F's conference in 1978. is not in DE.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks for your asistance.
> >>>>
> >>>> Rgds,
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Michael Maidan
> >>>>
> >>>> *
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Foucault-L mailing list
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Foucault-L mailing list
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 11
> >> Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 12:09:37 +0200
> >> From: "M. Karskens" <mkarskens@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] looking for text
> >> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Message-ID: <20090514100932.F4118C7096@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed
> >>
> >> a complete English translation of the conference
> >> and the discussion can be found in The
> >> Political  ed. David Ingram, Blackwell 2002, pp. 191-211.
> >>
> >> yours
> >> machiel karskens
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>     At 23:44 13-5-2009, you wrote:
> >>> Dear members of Foucault List, I am looking for
> >>> the following text: *Foucault,  Qu'est-ce que la
> >>> critique ? (Critique et Aufkl??rung), Bulletin
> >>> de la societe franciase de philosophie,
> >>> **n??1990 84 2 This is the text F's conference
> >>> in 1978. is not in DE. Thanks for your
> >>> asistance. Rgds, Michael Maidan *
> >>> _______________________________________________ Foucault-L
> >>> mailing list
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Prof. Machiel Karskens
> >> social and political philosophy
> >> Faculty of Philosophy
> >> Radboud University Nijmegen - The Netherlands
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 12
> >> Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 15:13:55 -0400
> >> From: james <spatium@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Info on foucauldian research in France
> >> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Message-ID:
> >>         <c74774220905161213i4947cb2o6d293934adc10b67@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
> >>
> >> Michel Senellart was at ENS-LSH in Lyon last time I was there.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Chetan Vemuri
> >> <aryavartacnsrn@xxxxxxxxx
> >>> wrote:
> >>
> >>> University of Paris VII (I think that's it?) has Frederic Gros,
> >>> who  has
> >>> edited and transcribed the lectures for 82, 83 and 84. A
> >>> respected French
> >>> scholar on Foucault.
> >>> There is also Michel Senellart, but I forget where he works.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 4:58 PM, David McInerney
> >>> <vagabond@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> This is an interesting problem.
> >>>>
> >>>> You would perhaps be best to speak to someone in France about it.
> >>>> I'm not sure that there are people in France who spend their whole
> >>>> lives studying Foucault - perhaps he's just not that exotic to
> >>>> them?   Pierre Macherey for example has written important essays
> >>>> Foucault, but his main interest is in Spinoza, and he seems to have
> >>>> written at least as much on Canguilhem (who I believe supervised
> >>>> both
> >>>> him and Foucault) as on Foucault.  He is retired now but maybe
> >>>> someone at his university (Lille III) is also working on Foucault.
> >>>> If you are comfortable speaking and writing in French you might try
> >>>> there.  I know of at least two people from English-speaking
> >>>> countries
> >>>> who studied there with him in the 1990s.
> >>>>
> >>>> Here's his website: http://stl.recherche.univ-lille3.fr/
> >>>> sitespersonnels/macherey/accueilmacherey.html
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 13/05/2009, at 2:06 AM, <goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I was wondering if anyone could help me with the following
> >>>>> problem:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> while browsing through post-graduate "brochures" of French
> >>>>> universities, especially that of EHESS's department of Political
> >>>>> Science (who's research centre is named Raymond Aron - I am well
> >>>>> aware of that) I could not find anyone (meaning professors) whose
> >>>>> work would primarily deal with Michel Foucault (I have browsed
> >>>>> through JSTOR, SAGE and persee.fr).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The question is therefore the following: is the university
> >>>>> Vincennes-St.Denis ?the (only) place? in France where foucauldian
> >>>>> research is being conducted or has it become (because of it's
> >>>>> ?nature?) so dispersed that it is everywhere yet nowhere??
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If someone could direct me to some/one/place with usefull
> >>>>> information it would be greatelly appreciated.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Best Regards, Goran Gaber
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Foucault-L mailing list
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Foucault-L mailing list
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Chetan Vemuri
> >>> West Des Moines, IA
> >>> aryavartacnsrn@xxxxxxxxx
> >>> (319)-512-9318
> >>> "You say you want a Revolution! Well you know, we all want to
> >>> change the
> >>> world"
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Foucault-L mailing list
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 13
> >> Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 19:28:11 -0700 (PDT)
> >> From: Paul Taborsky <pdtaborsky@xxxxxxxx>
> >> Subject: [Foucault-L] Jules Vuillemin
> >> To: foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Message-ID: <564631.80496.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> >>
> >> I have been reading Jules Vuillemin's 'L'Heritage Kantienne et la
> >> revolution copernicienne: Fichte - Cohen - Heidegger', (1954), and
> >> it is
> >> obvious that a great deal of Foucault's ideas about the post-Kantian
> >> epistemological framework must have been influenced by this work. Yet
> >> nowhere do I recall Foucault acknowledging his influence. Is
> >> Vuillemin's
> >> influence on Foucault well known? If not, it certainly should be,
> >> for it
> >> strikes me that, at least for his early, 'archaeological' work,
> >> this book is
> >> as least as important as, if not more important than, the other usual
> >> sources of influence that are often cited, such as Canguilhem.
> >>
> >>   Paul Taborsky, Zheng Li Shiji Dasha, Suite 1106, 199 Laodong Xilu,
> >> Changsha, Hunan, 410002 China.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> __________________________________________________________________
> >> Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk
> >> email the
> >> boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail.  Click on Options in Mail and
> >> switch to
> >> New Mail today or register for free at http://mail.yahoo.ca
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 14
> >> Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 21:09:29 -0700 (PDT)
> >> From: pong naiyavitit <pongn@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Jules Vuillemin
> >> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Message-ID: <982703.49737.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> >>
> >>
> >> wiki.fr claims that Vuillemin is a friend of Foucault, and they also
> >> discussed each other while Foucault worked on OT.
> >>
> >> http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jules_Vuillemin
> >>
> >> That's what I know
> >>
> >> pong
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --- On Tue, 5/19/09, Paul Taborsky <pdtaborsky@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Paul Taborsky <pdtaborsky@xxxxxxxx>
> >> Subject: [Foucault-L] Jules Vuillemin
> >> To: foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 9:28 AM
> >>
> >> I have been reading Jules Vuillemin's 'L'Heritage Kantienne et la
> >> revolution copernicienne: Fichte - Cohen - Heidegger', (1954), and
> >> it is
> >> obvious that a great deal of Foucault's ideas about the post-Kantian
> >> epistemological framework must have been influenced by this work. Yet
> >> nowhere do I recall Foucault acknowledging his influence. Is
> >> Vuillemin's
> >> influence on Foucault well known? If not, it certainly should be,
> >> for it
> >> strikes me that, at least for his early, 'archaeological' work,
> >> this book is
> >> as least as important as, if not more important than, the other usual
> >> sources of influence that are often cited, such as Canguilhem.
> >>
> >>   Paul Taborsky, Zheng Li Shiji Dasha, Suite 1106, 199 Laodong Xilu,
> >> Changsha, Hunan, 410002 China.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ? ? ?
> >> __________________________________________________________________
> >> Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk
> >> email the
> >> boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail.? Click on Options in Mail and
> >> switch to
> >> New Mail today or register for free at http://mail.yahoo.ca
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Foucault-L mailing list
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 15
> >> Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 20:30:32 +0000
> >> From: <ian.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Subject: [Foucault-L] Using the forum
> >> To: <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Message-ID: <BLU121-W27D896CACF04D2D581F595E5590@xxxxxxx>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >>
> >>
> >> I have just subscribed to the forum/notice board and and replying
> >> in order
> >> to start leaving messages on the board.
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 16
> >> Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 20:38:46 +0000
> >> From: <ian.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Subject: [Foucault-L] Foucault and interpretivism
> >> To: <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Message-ID: <BLU121-W668A98A839C590243043AE5590@xxxxxxx>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >>
> >>
> >> I am fairly new to Foucauldian methods and am currently trying to
> >> understand whether the idea of interpretation has any place in using
> >> Foucault's methods. I understand that for Foucault there is no
> >> inside or
> >> outside of discourse so in using his methods it is important to aviod
> >> searching for meaning.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> My question would be, when analysing data am I just describing the
> >> practices? But then surely my descriptions are only my
> >> interpretation? From
> >> what I can see (with my noice minds eye) there is no way out of
> >> interpretation, or am I just talking about two different things?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Any feedback about this, or useful and informative pieces to read,
> >> or some
> >> general feedback on using Foucault would be much appreciated.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> Ian
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 17
> >> Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 07:23:51 +0930
> >> From: David McInerney <vagabond@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Foucault and interpretivism
> >> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Message-ID: <4D3493A2-981B-412E-B919-4233F9A9BFDD@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
> >>
> >> Welcome to the list Ian.
> >>
> >> I was reading something the other day that discussed this issue.
> >>
> >> I think it might have been Dominick LaCapra's History and Reading:
> >> Tocqueville, Foucault, French Studies (University of Toronto Press,
> >> 2000).  You might start there.
> >>
> >> You are right to assume that Foucault generally avoids searching for
> >> a meaning 'underneath' or 'behind' discourse in that hermeneutical
> >> sense, but I'm not sure how explicit he is about a lot of that.  It
> >> seems to be more a general feature of his work, rather than something
> >> he intervenes on repeatedly.  For that kind of thing you might get
> >> something more sustained in Deleuze, Althusser, or Macherey.  The
> >> points where their positions on this intersect with those of Derrida
> >> perhaps indicate a general doxa - obviously there are divergences
> >> between all of these thinkers that are distinctive and mark out their
> >> different and opposed positions on certain points, but there is
> >> something to be gained by considering their shared assumptions, which
> >> indicate the shared terrain on which their disagreements play out.
> >>
> >> Unless someone can suggest a better alternative I'd say LaCapra's
> >> book's not a bad place to start.
> >>
> >> DM
> >>
> >>
> >> On 22/05/2009, at 6:08 AM, <ian.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I am fairly new to Foucauldian methods and am currently trying to
> >>> understand whether the idea of interpretation has any place in
> >>> using Foucault's methods. I understand that for Foucault there is
> >>> no inside or outside of discourse so in using his methods it is
> >>> important to aviod searching for meaning.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> My question would be, when analysing data am I just describing the
> >>> practices? But then surely my descriptions are only my
> >>> interpretation? From what I can see (with my noice minds eye) there
> >>> is no way out of interpretation, or am I just talking about two
> >>> different things?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Any feedback about this, or useful and informative pieces to read,
> >>> or some general feedback on using Foucault would be much
> >>> appreciated.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>>
> >>> Ian
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Foucault-L mailing list
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Foucault-L mailing list
> >> Foucault-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >> http://foucault.info/mailman/listinfo/foucault-l
> >>
> >> End of Foucault-L Digest, Vol 9, Issue 18
> >> *****************************************
> >>
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Foucault-L mailing list
> > Foucault-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > http://foucault.info/mailman/listinfo/foucault-l
> >
> > End of Foucault-L Digest, Vol 9, Issue 19
> > *****************************************
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Foucault-L mailing list
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Foucault-L mailing list
> Foucault-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> http://foucault.info/mailman/listinfo/foucault-l
>
> End of Foucault-L Digest, Vol 9, Issue 21
> *****************************************
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Foucault-L mailing list
>



-- 
Martin Hardie,
Law Lecturer,
School of Law,
Deakin University (Geelong Campus)
Pigdons Road,
Waurn Ponds,
Victoria, 3216,
Australia.

Tel: + 61 (0) 3 522 71307

http://newcyclingpathways.blogspot.com/

http://auskadi.mjzhosting.org/

mhardie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

martin.hardie@xxxxxxxxx

skype/irc: auskadi

Edward Said teaches us that the role of the academic has an edge to it and
it cannot be played without a sense of being someone whose role is to ask
embarrassing questions and whose raison d'etre is to represent those whose
issues are routinely swept under the rug.