The first chapter of Deleuze's book on Foucault provides a remarkable
introduction to Foucault's so-called archaeological works. It is not the
systematic, professorial treatment you will find in Dreyfus & Rabinow,
Gutting, or Beatrice Han---all of which you should read. But I think you
will find Deleuze's chapter very stimulating.
Regards,
Nate
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 3:30 AM, Zulfiqar Ali Philosophy <zali@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> I have recently finished my Ph. D. work on Foucault in relation to Marx. I
> am looking for major critiques on the issue of *epistme *and on the major
> argument of The Order of Things. I request all of you to kindly identify
> the
> books or articles in this regard.
>
> Zulfiqar Ali
> Pakistan
> _______________________________________________
> Foucault-L mailing list
>
--
Nathaniel Roberts
Visiting Faculty
Department of South Asia Studies
University of Pennsylvania
820 Williams Hall, 255 S. 36th Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
USA
introduction to Foucault's so-called archaeological works. It is not the
systematic, professorial treatment you will find in Dreyfus & Rabinow,
Gutting, or Beatrice Han---all of which you should read. But I think you
will find Deleuze's chapter very stimulating.
Regards,
Nate
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 3:30 AM, Zulfiqar Ali Philosophy <zali@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> I have recently finished my Ph. D. work on Foucault in relation to Marx. I
> am looking for major critiques on the issue of *epistme *and on the major
> argument of The Order of Things. I request all of you to kindly identify
> the
> books or articles in this regard.
>
> Zulfiqar Ali
> Pakistan
> _______________________________________________
> Foucault-L mailing list
>
--
Nathaniel Roberts
Visiting Faculty
Department of South Asia Studies
University of Pennsylvania
820 Williams Hall, 255 S. 36th Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
USA