Jason Read. 2003. The Micro-politics of Capital: Marx and the Prehistory of
the Present.
http://www.amazon.com/Micro-Politics-Capital-Marx-Prehistory-Present/dp/079145844X
joshua j. kurz
PhD Candidate, Comparative Studies
The Ohio State University
451 Hagerty Hall
1775 College Rd.
Columbus, OH 43210
no trees were harmed in the sending of this email, but trillions of
electrons were severely inconvenienced...
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Chathan Vemuri <aryavartacnsrn@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> I've asked some people I know with expertise on the matter but thought
> I'd get a better range of responses here. Me and some Marxist friends
> were discussing the Power and Strategies interview where Foucault
> talks about the Gulag. My friends felt he was creating a straw man by
> suggesting Marxism and Leninism be examined in light of the reality of
> the Gulag. They went to further to castigate Foucault for
> inadvertently being in theoretical alliance with liberal thought that
> only further ignored the necessary critique of capitalism. While I
> think they are right about Power and Strategies, I'm not sure if the
> other argument follows. Indeed it seems to be a common theme in
> Marx-Foucault comparisons. Foucauldians, on the other hand, feel no
> guilt in writing off Marxists as intellectual dinosaurs who have at
> best contributed to failed political killing machines (Stalin, Mao,
> Che). Does anyone on here know of some good arguments or even books
> that go beyond these useless exchanges? I personally feel there's a
> certain kinship between the two thinkers in terms of subjectiviation,
> power relations, concern with historicization. And how would one
> respond to such pointless jabs to begin with. I wasn't convinced of
> Foucault's neat link between Marx and Soviet repression but I hardly
> think that his critique is akin to a liberal philosophy of the state.
> --
> Chathan Vemuri
>
> 900 58th Street
> West Des Moines, IA 50266
> chathan-vemuri@xxxxxxxxx
> (319)-512-9318
> _______________________________________________
> Foucault-L mailing list
>
the Present.
http://www.amazon.com/Micro-Politics-Capital-Marx-Prehistory-Present/dp/079145844X
joshua j. kurz
PhD Candidate, Comparative Studies
The Ohio State University
451 Hagerty Hall
1775 College Rd.
Columbus, OH 43210
no trees were harmed in the sending of this email, but trillions of
electrons were severely inconvenienced...
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Chathan Vemuri <aryavartacnsrn@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> I've asked some people I know with expertise on the matter but thought
> I'd get a better range of responses here. Me and some Marxist friends
> were discussing the Power and Strategies interview where Foucault
> talks about the Gulag. My friends felt he was creating a straw man by
> suggesting Marxism and Leninism be examined in light of the reality of
> the Gulag. They went to further to castigate Foucault for
> inadvertently being in theoretical alliance with liberal thought that
> only further ignored the necessary critique of capitalism. While I
> think they are right about Power and Strategies, I'm not sure if the
> other argument follows. Indeed it seems to be a common theme in
> Marx-Foucault comparisons. Foucauldians, on the other hand, feel no
> guilt in writing off Marxists as intellectual dinosaurs who have at
> best contributed to failed political killing machines (Stalin, Mao,
> Che). Does anyone on here know of some good arguments or even books
> that go beyond these useless exchanges? I personally feel there's a
> certain kinship between the two thinkers in terms of subjectiviation,
> power relations, concern with historicization. And how would one
> respond to such pointless jabs to begin with. I wasn't convinced of
> Foucault's neat link between Marx and Soviet repression but I hardly
> think that his critique is akin to a liberal philosophy of the state.
> --
> Chathan Vemuri
>
> 900 58th Street
> West Des Moines, IA 50266
> chathan-vemuri@xxxxxxxxx
> (319)-512-9318
> _______________________________________________
> Foucault-L mailing list
>