Hi Eric. I'm not sure exactly what you're looking for, but a group of
frenchies do some good critiques of immanence. Ronell, Nancy, Blanchot,
Lyotard...etc. For a good look, for instance, at the critique that
immanence is simply the flipside of transcendence, check out the Miami
Theory Collective's _Community at Loose Ends_. Nancy and Lytard both
discuss immanence in there. The intro by Abbeele also concerns itself
with a critique of immanence. What Nancy, Blanchot, Lyotard, and Ronell
are after, instead of immanence, is finitude, singularity. Might check
it out.
CU,
DDD
--
Diane (Mowery) Davis
Assistant Professor of Rhetoric and Composition
Old Dominion University
Norfolk, VA 23925
dddavis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.odu.edu/0/gnusers/davis/ddd.htm
------------------
frenchies do some good critiques of immanence. Ronell, Nancy, Blanchot,
Lyotard...etc. For a good look, for instance, at the critique that
immanence is simply the flipside of transcendence, check out the Miami
Theory Collective's _Community at Loose Ends_. Nancy and Lytard both
discuss immanence in there. The intro by Abbeele also concerns itself
with a critique of immanence. What Nancy, Blanchot, Lyotard, and Ronell
are after, instead of immanence, is finitude, singularity. Might check
it out.
CU,
DDD
--
Diane (Mowery) Davis
Assistant Professor of Rhetoric and Composition
Old Dominion University
Norfolk, VA 23925
dddavis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.odu.edu/0/gnusers/davis/ddd.htm
------------------