Koray:
You are right in pointing out that the possible difference between the two
lies in the opposition between a fundamentally social subject (marx) and an
inscribed individuality. As we see especially in the ethical works of the
later Foucault, intersubjectivity does not play a central part. You write:
>So the two history is both different and the same. They are about the
>same man but their approaches follow different paths.
However, purely on the question of power and the body, I think F and M are
miles apart, both ontologically and historically. You should post some of
your paper on the list.
sam