Diane: What kind of rubbish is this: Diane nods vigorously. Obviously
you are not able to reply Michael's post in an intellignet way so you
get out of the tight spot by responding with this silly remark.
The only person you fool is yourself and the few others who engage in
these sillies.
Cop on!
> Micheal Guest wrote:
> >Isn't there also a question of accessing a form of (human) reality in
> >the absence of the body, in the way, say, that Lyotard suggests in _The
> >Inhuman_ - with the possibility of a trajectory of history and
> >technology extending beyond the life of the sun? Or the kind of reality
> >of blind vision generated inside Virilio's "vision machine"? X-file
> >space-creatures rather more personify the human, I suspect, than
> >evidence an extra-human reality. I thought that systems of discourse >and power were the original "inhuman" - producing the "human" with its >warm and runny connotations (ideological functions). Th
> word is too
> >saturated with such connotations to entertain with much seriousness the
> >axiom "all reality is human."
>
> Diane nods vigorously.
>
> ddd
> --
>
> DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
> D D
> D D. Diane Davis D
> D Rhetoric and Composition D
> D Old Dominion University D
> D dddavis@xxxxxxxxxxxx D
> D http://www.odu.edu/gnusers/davis/ddd.htm D
> D D
> DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
>
>
Yours etc.,
Karl
you are not able to reply Michael's post in an intellignet way so you
get out of the tight spot by responding with this silly remark.
The only person you fool is yourself and the few others who engage in
these sillies.
Cop on!
> Micheal Guest wrote:
> >Isn't there also a question of accessing a form of (human) reality in
> >the absence of the body, in the way, say, that Lyotard suggests in _The
> >Inhuman_ - with the possibility of a trajectory of history and
> >technology extending beyond the life of the sun? Or the kind of reality
> >of blind vision generated inside Virilio's "vision machine"? X-file
> >space-creatures rather more personify the human, I suspect, than
> >evidence an extra-human reality. I thought that systems of discourse >and power were the original "inhuman" - producing the "human" with its >warm and runny connotations (ideological functions). Th
> word is too
> >saturated with such connotations to entertain with much seriousness the
> >axiom "all reality is human."
>
> Diane nods vigorously.
>
> ddd
> --
>
> DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
> D D
> D D. Diane Davis D
> D Rhetoric and Composition D
> D Old Dominion University D
> D dddavis@xxxxxxxxxxxx D
> D http://www.odu.edu/gnusers/davis/ddd.htm D
> D D
> DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
>
>
Yours etc.,
Karl