At 09:42 PM 7/22/96 GMT+7, Mathew Lister wrote:
>As one who
>has spent quite a lot of time on Wittgenstein (more on the early then
>the late, though), and not as much as I'd like on Foucault et al,
>they seem to be saying much the same thing, although in a different
>way. When I read the so-called pomo thinkers, I cannot help but
>think that what they are doing (especially Buttler) is taking the
>type of thinking that Wittgenstein would did to its logical
>conclusions, applying it as it were. What do you think?
>Yours,
>M. Lister
>Philosophy _student_
>Boise State University
>list3793@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Sorry??? Who are these 'so-called pomo thinkers' that you speak so
pejoratively of? Honestly!
-------------------
Campbell Jones
University of Otago
New Zealand
-------------------
>As one who
>has spent quite a lot of time on Wittgenstein (more on the early then
>the late, though), and not as much as I'd like on Foucault et al,
>they seem to be saying much the same thing, although in a different
>way. When I read the so-called pomo thinkers, I cannot help but
>think that what they are doing (especially Buttler) is taking the
>type of thinking that Wittgenstein would did to its logical
>conclusions, applying it as it were. What do you think?
>Yours,
>M. Lister
>Philosophy _student_
>Boise State University
>list3793@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Sorry??? Who are these 'so-called pomo thinkers' that you speak so
pejoratively of? Honestly!
-------------------
Campbell Jones
University of Otago
New Zealand
-------------------