Yesyesyesyesyesyesyesyesyesyes!
At 12:38 AM 9/21/96 -0400, Solipsist9@xxxxxxx wrote:
>the power/knowledge relationship is ubiquitous. all knowledge succumbs to
>power. i don't think foucault allows for any objective positions outside of
>power. there is one problem i have been pondering, though. if it is true that
>none can escape the "power" of power and even academics are stuck in the
>"web," where does this leave foucault himself? are his writings and theories
>subject to this same power web, and if so, how can he (or we) be sure his
>position is not just the power structure creating his knowledge?
>
>
Az Khak Bar'amadim-o- Bar Khak Shodym
At 12:38 AM 9/21/96 -0400, Solipsist9@xxxxxxx wrote:
>the power/knowledge relationship is ubiquitous. all knowledge succumbs to
>power. i don't think foucault allows for any objective positions outside of
>power. there is one problem i have been pondering, though. if it is true that
>none can escape the "power" of power and even academics are stuck in the
>"web," where does this leave foucault himself? are his writings and theories
>subject to this same power web, and if so, how can he (or we) be sure his
>position is not just the power structure creating his knowledge?
>
>
Az Khak Bar'amadim-o- Bar Khak Shodym