Re: What is F.? was: Re: history of the present

>He constantly
>invites us into his space without weapons of
>analysis, but instead, asks us to interpret.
>He knows that his refinements of our thought
>will create a deeper well, or even a sensation
>of surface skimming, in kind of a paradoxical
>way. However, once in there, we end up
>being forced to see ourselves as having
>permutated and now permutating.

I definetly agree here F. manages to come accross
as harmless and then once he has you...
yet how do we come to c F. after the experience??
with our newly "refined" thought do
we find F. in a new perspective too?
If you look at F. as a product of his own
work then what is he? Have his thoughts
been refined too?



>definition of power is functional, having
>no essence or substantial thingness
>of its own.
You know I had never really
put the two togther in all honesty
Hence I think I'll have to rethink
my statement.

now the next part of your reply I actually wrote out
a reply to ,but then deleted it so I could make
somnething that makes more sense. hopefully I'll
mail it 2 the list later.

well I gotta admit I'm supirsed anyone relpied!
thanx agian





Partial thread listing: