>I noticed that none of the suggested Foucault primers include James
>Miller's book. What do the connoisseurs make of it?
>
>Doug
>Without intellectual merit. You'll learn nothing about Foucault but tons ab=
out
>the sexual fantasies of Jim Miller. Basically, it's offensive, homophobic,
>National-Inquirer voyeurism. I'm surprised Miller knows how to spell
>Nietzsche. You don't have to be a "connaisseur" of anything to figure this =
one
>out. Can argue specific points but frankly it's not worth the bother.
A.R. Monferr=E9
Department of French
Yale University
>Miller's book. What do the connoisseurs make of it?
>
>Doug
>Without intellectual merit. You'll learn nothing about Foucault but tons ab=
out
>the sexual fantasies of Jim Miller. Basically, it's offensive, homophobic,
>National-Inquirer voyeurism. I'm surprised Miller knows how to spell
>Nietzsche. You don't have to be a "connaisseur" of anything to figure this =
one
>out. Can argue specific points but frankly it's not worth the bother.
A.R. Monferr=E9
Department of French
Yale University