Wynship wrote:
> How ironic that you are saying this on the Foucault list! Foucault who
> devoted his last major work to the essentialization of sex - of which Reich
> must be the most devoted exponent - as a bourgeois ideology.
Hmm, I seriously doubt that Foucault considered Reich "bourgeois ideology".
But I may be wrong. However, I am not sure what relevance that has to the
preceding discussion.
> But show me a
> single computer scientist who involves Foucault in any way and I will
> consider your point made...if you can.
Why does it have to be a "computer scientist"? Just to shift ground?
OK, I consider it shifted. My poor house was built on sand.
It's true that my sarcasm is churlish, but the temptation is just too great,
because you're so unbelievably stiff. I have a hypothesis that you were
born as a logical positivist, and then born again into the Postmodern.
See, here I go again; it's irresistable. If one is me, that is.
-m
> How ironic that you are saying this on the Foucault list! Foucault who
> devoted his last major work to the essentialization of sex - of which Reich
> must be the most devoted exponent - as a bourgeois ideology.
Hmm, I seriously doubt that Foucault considered Reich "bourgeois ideology".
But I may be wrong. However, I am not sure what relevance that has to the
preceding discussion.
> But show me a
> single computer scientist who involves Foucault in any way and I will
> consider your point made...if you can.
Why does it have to be a "computer scientist"? Just to shift ground?
OK, I consider it shifted. My poor house was built on sand.
It's true that my sarcasm is churlish, but the temptation is just too great,
because you're so unbelievably stiff. I have a hypothesis that you were
born as a logical positivist, and then born again into the Postmodern.
See, here I go again; it's irresistable. If one is me, that is.
-m