Hi Stuart,
Probably not supposed to cite ourselves...modesty and all that. But
what the hell! I've never been able to do it before, and I may never get
to again! And it's hot off the press.
So...I've just had a paper published that looks at the ways discourses
surrounding HIV/AIDS and safer sex are structured, particularly with
respect to younger gay men. I'm not sure if this is the sort of thing
you are thinking about, but perhaps it's worth a look.
Blaine Rehkopf, "The Anal-ytic Discourses of AIDS and Safer Sex," in
_Inside the Academy and Out: Lesbian/Gay/Queer Studies and Social
Action_, Ed. Janice Ristock and Catherine Taylor, U of Toronto Press,
1998: pp. 220-243.
Peace,
Blaine
In your message of 15:12 Oct 13 1998, you write:
> Most of the responses have so far picked up on the hard sciences bit, but I
> would be interested in the ideas you have on HIV/AIDS, as my initial PhD
> project proposed to do this (not so much on the biomedical, but more of the
> social aspects). The PhD I have now nearly finished is entirely theoretical,
> but I am still thinking of doing the practical analysis at some point.
>
> Hopefully you will be able to provide a summary of some of your ideas.
>
> Best wishes
>
> Stuart
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joerg Marx, SHK FI <marx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sunday, October 11, 1998 00:10
> Subject: Biomedical discoursive and non-discoursive practices around AIDS
>
> I am working with a Foucauldian framework on biomedical dicourses
> around HIV/AIDS. My aim is to demonstrate, that a Foucauldian
> analysis is not only functioning in the field of human sciences, but
> also in the field of "hard sciences". Do anyone know something about
> this? Is anyone of you intersted to start a discussion about Foucault
> and natural sciences?
>
--
Probably not supposed to cite ourselves...modesty and all that. But
what the hell! I've never been able to do it before, and I may never get
to again! And it's hot off the press.
So...I've just had a paper published that looks at the ways discourses
surrounding HIV/AIDS and safer sex are structured, particularly with
respect to younger gay men. I'm not sure if this is the sort of thing
you are thinking about, but perhaps it's worth a look.
Blaine Rehkopf, "The Anal-ytic Discourses of AIDS and Safer Sex," in
_Inside the Academy and Out: Lesbian/Gay/Queer Studies and Social
Action_, Ed. Janice Ristock and Catherine Taylor, U of Toronto Press,
1998: pp. 220-243.
Peace,
Blaine
In your message of 15:12 Oct 13 1998, you write:
> Most of the responses have so far picked up on the hard sciences bit, but I
> would be interested in the ideas you have on HIV/AIDS, as my initial PhD
> project proposed to do this (not so much on the biomedical, but more of the
> social aspects). The PhD I have now nearly finished is entirely theoretical,
> but I am still thinking of doing the practical analysis at some point.
>
> Hopefully you will be able to provide a summary of some of your ideas.
>
> Best wishes
>
> Stuart
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joerg Marx, SHK FI <marx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sunday, October 11, 1998 00:10
> Subject: Biomedical discoursive and non-discoursive practices around AIDS
>
> I am working with a Foucauldian framework on biomedical dicourses
> around HIV/AIDS. My aim is to demonstrate, that a Foucauldian
> analysis is not only functioning in the field of human sciences, but
> also in the field of "hard sciences". Do anyone know something about
> this? Is anyone of you intersted to start a discussion about Foucault
> and natural sciences?
>
--