Stuart,
you're right - so far, I can follow your argument:
spaces of knowledge, micro- and macrophysics of knowledge ...
This is also my point of view.
Sure, Heidegger appears in my graphic (but don't take this graphic
to serious): on the left at the bottom - together with Merleau-Ponty
he represents there the movement of existentialism against
phenomenology in the field of the hermeneutics.
Joerg
> From: "Stuart Elden" <Stuart.Elden@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Biomedical discoursive and non-discoursive practices =
around
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 00:13:55 +0100
> Reply-to: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Joerg, and others,
>
> My research is on Nietzsche, Heidegger and Foucault. The thesis looks at=
the
> role of space and place in the historical work of Foucault, and argues t=
hat
> to understand his theoretical background it is important to look at the =
work
> of Heidegger as well as Nietzsche. The reading of Heidegger examines how=
his
> attitude to questions of space changed through his career =96 particular=
ly as
> a result of his reading of Nietzsche and H=F6lderlin in the 1930s and 40=
s. A
> detailed reading of Heidegger shows how his work is important to Foucaul=
t,
> and allows us to understand the latter's practices and conceptual tools =
much
> more clearly. The theoretical insights such work achieves are then used =
to
> discuss Heidegger=92s work on technology and politics, and to re-read Fo=
ucault
> =92s Histoire de la folie and his genealogy of modern discipline from th=
e
> perspective of the spatial question; an analysis it is hoped sheds new l=
ight
> on their contribution to political theory.
>
> That's about it. Sorry for the rather formal prose, but the above is ada=
pted
> from my CV.
>
> Where did Heidegger come in your graphic?
>
> Best
>
> Stuart
>
you're right - so far, I can follow your argument:
spaces of knowledge, micro- and macrophysics of knowledge ...
This is also my point of view.
Sure, Heidegger appears in my graphic (but don't take this graphic
to serious): on the left at the bottom - together with Merleau-Ponty
he represents there the movement of existentialism against
phenomenology in the field of the hermeneutics.
Joerg
> From: "Stuart Elden" <Stuart.Elden@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Biomedical discoursive and non-discoursive practices =
around
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 00:13:55 +0100
> Reply-to: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Joerg, and others,
>
> My research is on Nietzsche, Heidegger and Foucault. The thesis looks at=
the
> role of space and place in the historical work of Foucault, and argues t=
hat
> to understand his theoretical background it is important to look at the =
work
> of Heidegger as well as Nietzsche. The reading of Heidegger examines how=
his
> attitude to questions of space changed through his career =96 particular=
ly as
> a result of his reading of Nietzsche and H=F6lderlin in the 1930s and 40=
s. A
> detailed reading of Heidegger shows how his work is important to Foucaul=
t,
> and allows us to understand the latter's practices and conceptual tools =
much
> more clearly. The theoretical insights such work achieves are then used =
to
> discuss Heidegger=92s work on technology and politics, and to re-read Fo=
ucault
> =92s Histoire de la folie and his genealogy of modern discipline from th=
e
> perspective of the spatial question; an analysis it is hoped sheds new l=
ight
> on their contribution to political theory.
>
> That's about it. Sorry for the rather formal prose, but the above is ada=
pted
> from my CV.
>
> Where did Heidegger come in your graphic?
>
> Best
>
> Stuart
>