you may also look at Foucault health and medicine, ed by Petersen and=20
Bunton. there is in fact a lot of work which use or critique Foucault's=20
method or at least use it as a vantage point to go further. A
On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Joerg Marx, SHK FI wrote:
> Thanks, Emmanuelle.
> I'll have a look on it.
> Joerg
>=20
> > Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1998 11:45:11 +0100
> > To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > From: E.Tulle-Winton@xxxxxxxxxx (Emmanuelle Tulle-Winton)
> > Subject: Re: Biomedical discoursive and non-discoursive practices=
around AIDS
> > Reply-to: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>=20
> > At 12:12 am 11/10/98, Joerg Marx, SHK FI wrote:
> > >I am working with a Foucauldian framework on biomedical dicourses
> > >around HIV/AIDS. My aim is to demonstrate, that a Foucauldian
> > >analysis is not only functioning in the field of human sciences, but
> > >also in the field of "hard sciences". Do anyone know something about
> > >this? Is anyone of you intersted to start a discussion about Foucault
> > >and natural sciences?
> >=20
> > Joerg, how is your French? If it's adequate, try the following piece:
> > Foucault, M. 1994. Sur l'arch=E9ologie des sciences. R=E9ponse au Cercl=
e
> > d'=E9pistemologie. In Dits et Ecrits Vol 1. Gallimard, Paris, 696-731.
> > Emmanuelle
> >=20
> > Emmanuelle Tulle-Winton
> > Department of Social Sciences
> > Glasgow Caledonian University
> > Glasgow G4 0BA
> > Scotland
> > Tel: 0141 331 3330 (+ 44 141 331 3330 international)
> > Fax: 0141 331 3439 (+ 44 141 331 3439 international)
> >=20
> >=20
>=20
Bunton. there is in fact a lot of work which use or critique Foucault's=20
method or at least use it as a vantage point to go further. A
On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Joerg Marx, SHK FI wrote:
> Thanks, Emmanuelle.
> I'll have a look on it.
> Joerg
>=20
> > Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1998 11:45:11 +0100
> > To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > From: E.Tulle-Winton@xxxxxxxxxx (Emmanuelle Tulle-Winton)
> > Subject: Re: Biomedical discoursive and non-discoursive practices=
around AIDS
> > Reply-to: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>=20
> > At 12:12 am 11/10/98, Joerg Marx, SHK FI wrote:
> > >I am working with a Foucauldian framework on biomedical dicourses
> > >around HIV/AIDS. My aim is to demonstrate, that a Foucauldian
> > >analysis is not only functioning in the field of human sciences, but
> > >also in the field of "hard sciences". Do anyone know something about
> > >this? Is anyone of you intersted to start a discussion about Foucault
> > >and natural sciences?
> >=20
> > Joerg, how is your French? If it's adequate, try the following piece:
> > Foucault, M. 1994. Sur l'arch=E9ologie des sciences. R=E9ponse au Cercl=
e
> > d'=E9pistemologie. In Dits et Ecrits Vol 1. Gallimard, Paris, 696-731.
> > Emmanuelle
> >=20
> > Emmanuelle Tulle-Winton
> > Department of Social Sciences
> > Glasgow Caledonian University
> > Glasgow G4 0BA
> > Scotland
> > Tel: 0141 331 3330 (+ 44 141 331 3330 international)
> > Fax: 0141 331 3439 (+ 44 141 331 3439 international)
> >=20
> >=20
>=20