Re: Subjectivity and Critique




>From owner-foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fri Jan 08 07:54:26 1999
>Received: from [128.143.200.198] by hotmail.com (1.0) with SMTP id
MHotMail3093263663219353506532498215690669440850; Fri Jan 08 07:54:26
1999
>Received: (from domo@localhost) by lists.village.virginia.edu
(8.8.5/8.6.6) id KAA25504 for foucault-outgoing; Fri, 8 Jan 1999
10:24:37 -0500
>X-Authentication-Warning: lists.village.virginia.edu: domo set sender
to owner-foucault@localhost using -f
>Received: from f04n07.cac.psu.edu (f04s07.cac.psu.edu [128.118.141.35])
by lists.village.virginia.edu (8.8.5/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA20636 for
<foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 8 Jan 1999 10:24:32 -0500
>Received: from nb5slip153.cac.psu.edu (nb5slip153.cac.psu.edu
[146.186.17.153]) by f04n07.cac.psu.edu (8.8.7/8.6.12) with SMTP id
KAA81898 for <foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 8 Jan 1999
10:24:30 -0500
>Message-Id: <199901081524.KAA81898@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>X-Sender: dls216@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Unverified)
>X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.3
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 11:29:49 -0500
>To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>From: dls216@xxxxxxx (Daniel Smith)
>Subject: Subjectivity and Critique
>Sender: owner-foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Precedence: bulk
>Reply-To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>Greetings all:
>
>I'm not quite sure how to frame this question/request, so please
>bear with me.
>
>I am looking for books and/or articles that examine/explore
>the implications of Foucauldian/poststructuralist conceptions
>of subjectivity and their relation to the practice of
>analysis and critique. Put another way, how does a critic/
>analyst who subscribes to a notion of subjectivity that
>problematizes/interrogates issues of agency, self-determination,
>knowledge and autonomy in relation to the subject situate/explain
>his or her practice of critique? Indeed, how do "pomo"
>conceptions of subjectivity problematize the idea and practice of
critique?
>I am familiar with Foucault's formulation of the "specific
intellectual" but
>would be interested in examining texts that
>discuss these issues in more detail.
>
>If I can clarify any of the above, let me know.
>Thanks for your help.
>
>Cordially,
>
>Daniel Smith
>


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

Partial thread listing: