This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0005_01BE9816.DDCF37C0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archaeology of Knowledge, p. 125, English trans.:
To describe a group of statements not as a closed, plethoric totality of =
meaning but as an incomplete, fragmented figure, in accordance with the =
dispersion of an exteriority; to describe a group of statements in order =
to rediscover the specific forms of an accumulation--is certainly not to =
uncover an interpretation, discover a foundation, free constituent acts, =
nor is it to decide on a rationality or to embrace a teleology. It is to =
establish a *positivity*. To analyze a discursive formation is to define =
the type of positivity of a discourse. If by substituting the analysis =
of rarity for the search for totalities, the description of relations of =
exteriority for the theme of transcendental foundation, the analysis of =
accumulations for the quest of the origin, means one is a positivist, =
then I am quite happy to be one.
------=_NextPart_000_0005_01BE9816.DDCF37C0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2014.210" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 face=3D"Courier New" size=3D4>Archaeology of =
Knowledge, p.=20
125, English trans.:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>
<P>To describe a group of statements not as a closed, plethoric totality =
of=20
meaning but as an incomplete, fragmented figure, in accordance with the=20
dispersion of an exteriority; to describe a group of statements in order =
to=20
rediscover the specific forms of an accumulation--is certainly not to =
uncover an=20
interpretation, discover a foundation, free constituent acts, nor is it =
to=20
decide on a rationality or to embrace a teleology. It is to establish=20
a *positivity*. To analyze a discursive formation is to define the =
type of=20
positivity of a discourse. If by substituting the analysis of rarity for =
the=20
search for totalities, the description of relations of exteriority for =
the theme=20
of transcendental foundation, the analysis of accumulations for the =
quest of the=20
origin, means one is a positivist, then I am quite happy to be=20
one.</P></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0005_01BE9816.DDCF37C0--
------=_NextPart_000_0005_01BE9816.DDCF37C0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archaeology of Knowledge, p. 125, English trans.:
To describe a group of statements not as a closed, plethoric totality of =
meaning but as an incomplete, fragmented figure, in accordance with the =
dispersion of an exteriority; to describe a group of statements in order =
to rediscover the specific forms of an accumulation--is certainly not to =
uncover an interpretation, discover a foundation, free constituent acts, =
nor is it to decide on a rationality or to embrace a teleology. It is to =
establish a *positivity*. To analyze a discursive formation is to define =
the type of positivity of a discourse. If by substituting the analysis =
of rarity for the search for totalities, the description of relations of =
exteriority for the theme of transcendental foundation, the analysis of =
accumulations for the quest of the origin, means one is a positivist, =
then I am quite happy to be one.
------=_NextPart_000_0005_01BE9816.DDCF37C0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2014.210" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 face=3D"Courier New" size=3D4>Archaeology of =
Knowledge, p.=20
125, English trans.:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>
<P>To describe a group of statements not as a closed, plethoric totality =
of=20
meaning but as an incomplete, fragmented figure, in accordance with the=20
dispersion of an exteriority; to describe a group of statements in order =
to=20
rediscover the specific forms of an accumulation--is certainly not to =
uncover an=20
interpretation, discover a foundation, free constituent acts, nor is it =
to=20
decide on a rationality or to embrace a teleology. It is to establish=20
a *positivity*. To analyze a discursive formation is to define the =
type of=20
positivity of a discourse. If by substituting the analysis of rarity for =
the=20
search for totalities, the description of relations of exteriority for =
the theme=20
of transcendental foundation, the analysis of accumulations for the =
quest of the=20
origin, means one is a positivist, then I am quite happy to be=20
one.</P></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0005_01BE9816.DDCF37C0--