In a message dated 10/22/99 10:46:12 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
levi_bryant@xxxxxxxxx writes:
<< If Foucault is in some sense claiming that
identities such as madness are discursive formations
molded from a field of forces, then the evocation of a
true or authentic madness can only represent one more
rationalization of madness in a series of other
rationalizations. In other words, Foucault, according
to Derrida, falls prey to precisely the same fallacy
that he accuses psychology of... >>
wouldn't this same reasoning also hold true for Derrida?
joe brennan....
levi_bryant@xxxxxxxxx writes:
<< If Foucault is in some sense claiming that
identities such as madness are discursive formations
molded from a field of forces, then the evocation of a
true or authentic madness can only represent one more
rationalization of madness in a series of other
rationalizations. In other words, Foucault, according
to Derrida, falls prey to precisely the same fallacy
that he accuses psychology of... >>
wouldn't this same reasoning also hold true for Derrida?
joe brennan....