Re: The Subject and Power

Hi David,

I'll make an attempt to clarify this. I think the distinction between
those two areas is that the 3rd deals with exercises of power, and the 4th
focusses on systems or apparatusses (dispositifs) of power. Of course the
former is exercised in the latter, but for his analysis, Foucault thinks
they must be treated separately.

Sean


>(I posted this a while back and received no responses. So I thought I'd try
>one more time.)
>
>Perhaps one or more of the participants in the Foucault list could clear up
>a muddy issue for me. In "The Subject and Power," the afterword to Dreyfus
>and Rabinow, _Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics_ (2nd ed.,1983), p. 223,
>Foucault lays out five areas of investigation for an analysis of power
>relations. My question concerns the third and fourth points: "The means of
>bringing power relations into being," vs. "Forms of institutionalization."
>Foucault's description doesn't clarify the difference between the two, at
>least in my reading. For example, he cites "systems of surveillance" as an
>example of *means*, but that would (to my mind) fall into the
>*institutionalization* category.
>
>Can someone clear up for me what Foucault means by these third and fourth
>categories, and how they differ from each other?
>
>Thank you.
>
>Peace,
>David Brockman
>Graduate Student, Theological Studies
>Brite Divinity School (TCU)
>Fort Worth, Texas USA




Partial thread listing: