This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_000F_01BF74BC.1F305C80
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I wanted to see if I was in agreement w/ Foucault's critique of Derrida =
(predominanty in "my body...." and _Archaeology_)
Is it that 1) deconstruction reinscribes the same origins it =
attempts to move away from with things like the trace, differance, =
archi-writing, etc.. and 2) deconstruction ignores the specific cultural =
and historical sites and struggles that constitute such origins =
deconstruction aims its criticism at? In other words, geneology focuses =
on how origins are formed and thus opens spaces for resistance to those =
formations, whereas deconstruction at best replicates metaphysical =
origins through notions of the trace, etc..
thanks
Loren
UTexas
------=_NextPart_000_000F_01BF74BC.1F305C80
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I wanted to see if I was in agreement =
w/ Foucault's=20
critique of Derrida (predominanty in "my body...." and=20
_Archaeology_)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> Is it that 1) =
deconstruction=20
reinscribes the same origins it attempts to move away from with things =
like the=20
trace, differance, archi-writing, etc.. and 2) deconstruction ignores =
the=20
specific cultural and historical sites and struggles that constitute =
such=20
origins deconstruction aims its criticism at? In other words, =
geneology=20
focuses on how origins are formed and thus opens spaces for resistance =
to those=20
formations, whereas deconstruction at best replicates metaphysical =
origins=20
through notions of the trace, etc..</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>thanks</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Loren</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>UTexas</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_000F_01BF74BC.1F305C80--
------=_NextPart_000_000F_01BF74BC.1F305C80
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I wanted to see if I was in agreement w/ Foucault's critique of Derrida =
(predominanty in "my body...." and _Archaeology_)
Is it that 1) deconstruction reinscribes the same origins it =
attempts to move away from with things like the trace, differance, =
archi-writing, etc.. and 2) deconstruction ignores the specific cultural =
and historical sites and struggles that constitute such origins =
deconstruction aims its criticism at? In other words, geneology focuses =
on how origins are formed and thus opens spaces for resistance to those =
formations, whereas deconstruction at best replicates metaphysical =
origins through notions of the trace, etc..
thanks
Loren
UTexas
------=_NextPart_000_000F_01BF74BC.1F305C80
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I wanted to see if I was in agreement =
w/ Foucault's=20
critique of Derrida (predominanty in "my body...." and=20
_Archaeology_)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> Is it that 1) =
deconstruction=20
reinscribes the same origins it attempts to move away from with things =
like the=20
trace, differance, archi-writing, etc.. and 2) deconstruction ignores =
the=20
specific cultural and historical sites and struggles that constitute =
such=20
origins deconstruction aims its criticism at? In other words, =
geneology=20
focuses on how origins are formed and thus opens spaces for resistance =
to those=20
formations, whereas deconstruction at best replicates metaphysical =
origins=20
through notions of the trace, etc..</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>thanks</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Loren</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>UTexas</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_000F_01BF74BC.1F305C80--