But, can't we make the statement that (nearly) everything is derived
from texts or other linguistic media?
>Well, I think he meant this statement literally, not metaphorically.
>We derive history from texts or other linguistic mediums.
>
>On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Bob wrote:
>
> > >Historians, as Gadamer puts it, immerse themselves in the
> > >stream of history - history is like one extremely large text,
> > >and its events and epochs constitute chapters or books.
> >
> > And yet, "history" can hardly be reduced to a diachronic/linear
> > model. While indeed it unfolds in time, it does not appear to me to
> > be a text, which to me implies being read diachronically (granted,
> > you may skip around, check the index, check the footnotes), but the
> > experience to me inferred by "reading" is one of diachronicity.
> > Rather I find history to be more synchronous, hence more like a
> > matrix.
> >
> >
from texts or other linguistic media?
>Well, I think he meant this statement literally, not metaphorically.
>We derive history from texts or other linguistic mediums.
>
>On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Bob wrote:
>
> > >Historians, as Gadamer puts it, immerse themselves in the
> > >stream of history - history is like one extremely large text,
> > >and its events and epochs constitute chapters or books.
> >
> > And yet, "history" can hardly be reduced to a diachronic/linear
> > model. While indeed it unfolds in time, it does not appear to me to
> > be a text, which to me implies being read diachronically (granted,
> > you may skip around, check the index, check the footnotes), but the
> > experience to me inferred by "reading" is one of diachronicity.
> > Rather I find history to be more synchronous, hence more like a
> > matrix.
> >
> >