RE: Ever-Present Resistance and Cryptonormativity

A brief correction:

Thus it seems to me that the issue at hand is not whether or not D.
ignores that F. said the power-resistance couplet is not one of resistance
[should read "one of opposition"],
but whether or not Deleuze's description of Foucauldian power as a molar
effect of desire and not as a primary constitutive force has anything to it?


Cheers,
Dan



Partial thread listing: