hi loren,
try pages 104 and 105 of AK. -- dan smith
At 06:39 PM 10/16/00 -0500, you wrote:
>there is a place in AK foucault specifically mentions the trace (in the
>derridian sense; or--probably in the derridian sense).. I've looked all
>over for it, because i've seen it before when referenced in a secondary
>source.. does anyone know where that might be? (arguably the entirety of
>the book is a critique of the trace, but i'm looking for an explicit mention)
>
>loren
>
try pages 104 and 105 of AK. -- dan smith
At 06:39 PM 10/16/00 -0500, you wrote:
>there is a place in AK foucault specifically mentions the trace (in the
>derridian sense; or--probably in the derridian sense).. I've looked all
>over for it, because i've seen it before when referenced in a secondary
>source.. does anyone know where that might be? (arguably the entirety of
>the book is a critique of the trace, but i'm looking for an explicit mention)
>
>loren
>