Dear Loren,
In fact there are over 20 places in AK, where you probably can find the term
"trace". Probably, because I am referring to the german translation
("Spur"), but I do not think, that this is a great problem. In fact there
are about 5 sentences in the introduction, where you can find the term. All
of them around the distinction of monument and document (P. 14-19 in german
t.). In the first chapter about the unities of discourse you can find
"trace" in the discussion of the "opus" (p. 39, g.t., around "repressive
presence") And there is beyond others also a question on one of the last
polemic pages of AK: "Discourse wouldn't be .. a trace?"
Alessandro
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]Im Auftrag von Loren
Dent
Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. Oktober 2000 01:39
An: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: Archaeology of Knowledge, The trace
there is a place in AK foucault specifically mentions the trace (in the
derridian sense; or--probably in the derridian sense).. I've looked all
over for it, because i've seen it before when referenced in a secondary
source.. does anyone know where that might be? (arguably the entirety of
the book is a critique of the trace, but i'm looking for an explicit
mention)
loren
In fact there are over 20 places in AK, where you probably can find the term
"trace". Probably, because I am referring to the german translation
("Spur"), but I do not think, that this is a great problem. In fact there
are about 5 sentences in the introduction, where you can find the term. All
of them around the distinction of monument and document (P. 14-19 in german
t.). In the first chapter about the unities of discourse you can find
"trace" in the discussion of the "opus" (p. 39, g.t., around "repressive
presence") And there is beyond others also a question on one of the last
polemic pages of AK: "Discourse wouldn't be .. a trace?"
Alessandro
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]Im Auftrag von Loren
Dent
Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. Oktober 2000 01:39
An: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: Archaeology of Knowledge, The trace
there is a place in AK foucault specifically mentions the trace (in the
derridian sense; or--probably in the derridian sense).. I've looked all
over for it, because i've seen it before when referenced in a secondary
source.. does anyone know where that might be? (arguably the entirety of
the book is a critique of the trace, but i'm looking for an explicit
mention)
loren