I just caught up and saw the ugly ending to the discussion I just attempted
to contribute to! Feel free to ignore my last post! And remember, those of
you bothered by this flood of e-mails, that you may always do what I usually
do --- just delete all Foucault list messages without reading them.
Just a tip,
Dan
----Original Message Follows----
From: Dan Fincke <thegreatfandincke@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Is Juan Cruz a Homosexual himself? - homophobia
Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2001 01:46:05 -0500
Nathan,
Bryan's argument was about exclusionary discourses not about the legal
restraints on speech. Those are secondary to deeper issues of implicit
social structures which drive towards changes in laws with by developing new
power/knowledge structures. His objection to reactionarism among the
anti-racists still needs to be better addressed. (assuming no post since
the once I am here responding to has done this--- I still haven't gotten
that far. :-)
----Original Message Follows----
From: Nathan Goralnik <rhizome85@xxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Is Juan Cruz a Homosexual himself? - homophobia
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 14:40:16 -0700
Bryan C says:
> But they deny him the right to constitute himself as a homophob.
Bullshit. Juan can say whatever he wants, and we can respond however we
want. Yelling at Nazis doesn't violate the First Amendment.
~Nate
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
to contribute to! Feel free to ignore my last post! And remember, those of
you bothered by this flood of e-mails, that you may always do what I usually
do --- just delete all Foucault list messages without reading them.
Just a tip,
Dan
----Original Message Follows----
From: Dan Fincke <thegreatfandincke@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Is Juan Cruz a Homosexual himself? - homophobia
Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2001 01:46:05 -0500
Nathan,
Bryan's argument was about exclusionary discourses not about the legal
restraints on speech. Those are secondary to deeper issues of implicit
social structures which drive towards changes in laws with by developing new
power/knowledge structures. His objection to reactionarism among the
anti-racists still needs to be better addressed. (assuming no post since
the once I am here responding to has done this--- I still haven't gotten
that far. :-)
----Original Message Follows----
From: Nathan Goralnik <rhizome85@xxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Is Juan Cruz a Homosexual himself? - homophobia
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 14:40:16 -0700
Bryan C says:
> But they deny him the right to constitute himself as a homophob.
Bullshit. Juan can say whatever he wants, and we can respond however we
want. Yelling at Nazis doesn't violate the First Amendment.
~Nate
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com