Quoting Stuart Elden <stuart.elden@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
Dear Larry,
could you indicate the adress of the Heidegger list to me - I am interested in
joining.
Tanks
Dr. Brunhilde Schweizer
> Larry
>
> Whilst I don't necessarily agree with everything you said, I appreciate
> the
> post which I can only hope will lead to some more thought before posting
> to
> this list.
>
> I despair of this list regularly. Compared to the parallel Heidegger
> list,
> which i've been on for a similar amount of time (over 4 years) the level
> of
> discussion is depressing. There are some very juvenile and ill-informed
> conversations here... but i stay around. Probably because occasionally
> something good happens, and i've met some very interesting and useful
> people
> through the list.
>
> That said, for a serious discussion of a difficult text -
> L'hermeneutique du
> sujet - I've set up a separate, private, distribution list. It's hardly
> resistance to 'aggressive stupidity that causes 'harm' ", but i can't
> fight
> everything that annoys me. So many times i've started a reply to an
> issue
> here, and then thought better of it. I don't have time to engage with
> every
> issue, and particularly not to engage in the back-and-forth it invokes.
> Elsewhere when i gave up on a debate i felt was going nowhere I was
> accused
> of wriggling out of it. Sometimes I just have to turn away.
>
> Best
>
> Stuart
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Larry
> > Chappell
> > Sent: 04 May 2001 11:43
> > To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: Bernard Bray
> > Subject: Taylor on Foucault and the ethics of reading and writing
> >
> >
>
>
Brunhilde S. Schweizer
131, Providence Square
London SE1 2ED
Tel + Fax 020 7252777
email sop01bsc
Dear Larry,
could you indicate the adress of the Heidegger list to me - I am interested in
joining.
Tanks
Dr. Brunhilde Schweizer
> Larry
>
> Whilst I don't necessarily agree with everything you said, I appreciate
> the
> post which I can only hope will lead to some more thought before posting
> to
> this list.
>
> I despair of this list regularly. Compared to the parallel Heidegger
> list,
> which i've been on for a similar amount of time (over 4 years) the level
> of
> discussion is depressing. There are some very juvenile and ill-informed
> conversations here... but i stay around. Probably because occasionally
> something good happens, and i've met some very interesting and useful
> people
> through the list.
>
> That said, for a serious discussion of a difficult text -
> L'hermeneutique du
> sujet - I've set up a separate, private, distribution list. It's hardly
> resistance to 'aggressive stupidity that causes 'harm' ", but i can't
> fight
> everything that annoys me. So many times i've started a reply to an
> issue
> here, and then thought better of it. I don't have time to engage with
> every
> issue, and particularly not to engage in the back-and-forth it invokes.
> Elsewhere when i gave up on a debate i felt was going nowhere I was
> accused
> of wriggling out of it. Sometimes I just have to turn away.
>
> Best
>
> Stuart
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Larry
> > Chappell
> > Sent: 04 May 2001 11:43
> > To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: Bernard Bray
> > Subject: Taylor on Foucault and the ethics of reading and writing
> >
> >
>
>
Brunhilde S. Schweizer
131, Providence Square
London SE1 2ED
Tel + Fax 020 7252777
email sop01bsc