Re: if -- And-- Foucault love dolls

6.5"???? I was hoping for more than that!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick M. Krueger" <Patrick.Krueger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 6:55 PM
Subject: Re: if -- And-- Foucault love dolls


>
> ask for foucault dolls, and ye shall have them.
>
> http://www.theory.org.uk/action.htm
>
>
>
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, charmaine driscoll wrote:
>
> > Now Patrick that sounds like a very good notion. I never thought of
that: A
> > Foucault doll, and perhaps a Plato doll, and perhaps a Patrick to stick
> > voodoo pins in. Where shall I pin them, in your ass' your testicles,
your
> > brains? Perhaps yes, your rules of enunciation might improve if I can
find
> > the right synapse.
> > On a more serious note you sound like an old 'new critic' who has not
> > overcome the episteme of your own cynical and bored reproach. I am sure
you
> > cannot read Derrida, or Foucalt. Perhaps you would do better to take
courses
> > in Introduction to Lit. Crit. Then you'd realise the meaning of what
you
> > are saying. God only knows, perhaps one day you might hazard a guess at
what
> > I am driving or others.
> >
> >
> > >From: Patrick Crosby <pcrosby@xxxxxxxx>
> > >Reply-To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >Subject: Re: if -- And
> > >Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 09:39:47 -0700
> > >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > C.Driscoll
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
> >
>
>


Partial thread listing: