Re: reach... the absurd

Come on, Jivko, the world's not made out of myths.

1. It's safer outside Israel then inside for any human being.
2. There's no reason why anyone should have the right to occupy the
place where one of his ancestors used to live.
3. Originally most of the jews came from Egypt so why don't they
wanna go back there?
4. Before we all came from Africa, you wanna go?

It's clear that the Israeli's are caught up in some logic of violence
and fear. There's room enough for everybody in that bloody desert out
there, but they just keep on casing each other. It has to do with some
tribal ideology evoked by religious feelings. Irony: they do almost the
same to the Palestines as the Nazi's did to them (the method of the
'final solution'). Is it because of religion?


Jivko Georgiev wrote:

> "Well, from a Foucauldina perspective, I would think
>> its because they have accepted the very model of
>> biopower and war of the races that justified the
>> holocaust."
> Isnt that the most absurdious and rediculious
> statement in the history? I think it is.Man, i havent
> seen whole my life such horrorble statemnt.
> Congratualations. I lost my words, sorry..
> This guys in israel have that statemnt as a basis of
> the Israeli politics - A Jewish is nowhere in the
> world safe, except in Israel. Thats what they do - All
> the land they are into now belongs to israel since
> maaaany maaany years. Long ago, when the celts were
> living still on the branches of the trees. The arabs
> settled in these places in the middle ages. What
> philosophers You are, when you know as much as a
> nonphilosophers know. The crusaders fighted the arabs,
> whole europe fighted the arabs, the arabs are
> expansive, they settle in a land and pretend allah
> gave them that land.
> Guys, you are all nuts! What is this racism, what is
> this biopower. You are notr philosophers, You are just
> ordinary citizns of usa and so on, you are not much
> different than the midle american, to whom only CNN
> can tell who is right and who not.And only CNN can
> tell What is What, which is philosophical problems.
> Regards!
> Zhivko Georgiev
> --- Allen Miller <millerpa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> jehms@xxxxxxxxxxxx 07/14/01 12:27 PM >>>
>> Allen I always get your mail in stereo.>>
>> Sorry, I think it might be because I'm responding to
>> people posting simultaneously to the Deleuze and the
>> Foucault list.
>> Allen Miller wrote:
>>> I'm with Nate. The problem isn't the articles or
>> their political content. If you look at Foucault's
>> political statments. They are very meticulously
>> argued and well documented (whether you agree with
>> them or not). He would be the last person who would
>> think merely quoting a newspaper article was in
>> itself a political statement. This is not to favor
>> intellectual masturbation. Rather it's because a)
>> documents never speak for themselves and b) the
>> issues are too important not to be engaged in a
>> thoughtful manner.
>>> By the way, you're right. The Israeli army is
>> capable of anything.
>> Interesting question might be: 'How come?'
>> Allen
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail

Partial thread listing: