Re: Re: disciplinary society in crisis

<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV>
<P>all three attachements you sent contain incurable virsues.</P>
<P>regards</P>
<P>ali<BR><BR></P></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>----Original Message Follows----
<DIV></DIV>From: "Ashley Byock" <A-BYOCK@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<DIV></DIV>To: <ALI_M_RIZVI@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<DIV></DIV>Subject: Re: Re: disciplinary society in crisis
<DIV></DIV>Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 14:18:06 -0500 (CDT)
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>'Ali Rizvi' wrote:
<DIV></DIV>====
<DIV></DIV>- Nathan
<DIV></DIV>-
<DIV></DIV>- Thanks for response.
<DIV></DIV>-
<DIV></DIV>- I think there are different levels on which debate should be situated and differentiated.
<DIV></DIV>-
<DIV></DIV>- My own understanding is that people who are talking about post disciplinary society (Deleuze, Negri) are talking about the 'opening up' of disciplinary society, not because of any struggle but because of the 'maturation' of the system itself/due to the internal dynamics of the system itself (this is evident for example in Negri's Empire). So the ...'
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> Take a look to the attachment.
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV><< Humor.TXT.pif >>
<DIV></DIV></div><br clear=all><hr>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <a href='http://go.msn.com/bql/hmtag_itl_EN.asp'>http://explorer.msn.com</a><br></html>