More important that the toolbox metaphor -- after all, what hardened
scientific realist wouldn't say that you should drop a theory if it's
useless?? -- is the idea of the relation between theory and practice being
that of a relay. In other words, theory and practice are distinct but
interrelated modes of intellectual activity and are not simply opposed to one
another. Practice inspires theory, and theory redefines practice. If I
recall correctly, all this is also in the "Intellectuals and Power" interview.
Nathan
>===== Original Message From Greg Seppi <wasistaufkung@xxxxxxxxx> =====
>I think that any potential for conflict between
>Foucault and "theory" can be put into perspective by
>several interviews, especially his conversation with
>Deleuze ("Intellectuals and Power") in _Language,
>Counter-Memory, Practice_ where Deleuze says that
>theories should be used like tools in a toolbox; if a
>theory does not work for you, discard it and find one
>that does. Foucault agrees, and here we can see the
>fundamental issue for Foucault: application. That is,
>if a theory is not working, or asks you to delay
>something important to you until a latter date, or
>until a "revolution" has been accomplished, than that
>theory is probably useless.
>Foucault and Deleuze both seem to agree that the work
>for intellectuals today is not to guide or to stand
>outside a struggle and watch, but to, as Foucault
>notes in a later interview "pull ears," or make people
>pay attention to issues that are important to you.
>"Theory" should be directly applicable, and should not
>block one's resistance to dominant power structures.
>I haven't studied archaeology enough, so I can only
>comment on Foucault's views on theory for now.
>
>- Greg
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
>http://personals.yahoo.com
Dr. Nathan Widder
Lecturer in Political Theory
University of Exeter
Exeter EX4 4RJ
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0)1392 263 183
Fax: +44 (0)1392 263 305
http://www.ex.ac.uk/shipss/politics/staff/widder/
scientific realist wouldn't say that you should drop a theory if it's
useless?? -- is the idea of the relation between theory and practice being
that of a relay. In other words, theory and practice are distinct but
interrelated modes of intellectual activity and are not simply opposed to one
another. Practice inspires theory, and theory redefines practice. If I
recall correctly, all this is also in the "Intellectuals and Power" interview.
Nathan
>===== Original Message From Greg Seppi <wasistaufkung@xxxxxxxxx> =====
>I think that any potential for conflict between
>Foucault and "theory" can be put into perspective by
>several interviews, especially his conversation with
>Deleuze ("Intellectuals and Power") in _Language,
>Counter-Memory, Practice_ where Deleuze says that
>theories should be used like tools in a toolbox; if a
>theory does not work for you, discard it and find one
>that does. Foucault agrees, and here we can see the
>fundamental issue for Foucault: application. That is,
>if a theory is not working, or asks you to delay
>something important to you until a latter date, or
>until a "revolution" has been accomplished, than that
>theory is probably useless.
>Foucault and Deleuze both seem to agree that the work
>for intellectuals today is not to guide or to stand
>outside a struggle and watch, but to, as Foucault
>notes in a later interview "pull ears," or make people
>pay attention to issues that are important to you.
>"Theory" should be directly applicable, and should not
>block one's resistance to dominant power structures.
>I haven't studied archaeology enough, so I can only
>comment on Foucault's views on theory for now.
>
>- Greg
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
>http://personals.yahoo.com
Dr. Nathan Widder
Lecturer in Political Theory
University of Exeter
Exeter EX4 4RJ
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0)1392 263 183
Fax: +44 (0)1392 263 305
http://www.ex.ac.uk/shipss/politics/staff/widder/