> but I don't think there is
> anything in his philosophy
> that would claim his methods only for his own use.
I can hesitate this certitude: we must remember that
the arquelogycal method claims for a tranversal cut
that analyses biology, economy and linguistic
disciplines to break a epistemical epoch...
Genealogycal method rather continues this
arqueologycal implicance...the disruptive point of his
method might be related to surveiller et punir as the
difurcation between the arquelogy of knowledge and the
genelogy of power...
Besides gobermentality is not merely a method but a
concept that is not methologycally developed, and
points to a subjetive fase of his thought related to
power and dispositives....
adr
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Información de Estados Unidos y América Latina, en Yahoo! Noticias.
Visítanos en http://noticias.espanol.yahoo.com
> anything in his philosophy
> that would claim his methods only for his own use.
I can hesitate this certitude: we must remember that
the arquelogycal method claims for a tranversal cut
that analyses biology, economy and linguistic
disciplines to break a epistemical epoch...
Genealogycal method rather continues this
arqueologycal implicance...the disruptive point of his
method might be related to surveiller et punir as the
difurcation between the arquelogy of knowledge and the
genelogy of power...
Besides gobermentality is not merely a method but a
concept that is not methologycally developed, and
points to a subjetive fase of his thought related to
power and dispositives....
adr
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Información de Estados Unidos y América Latina, en Yahoo! Noticias.
Visítanos en http://noticias.espanol.yahoo.com