<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> Professor Jorge M. Roche refines my metaphor "Warfare as Submission" by </DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>suggesting that if my hypothesis is correct, "What we might empirically
<DIV></DIV>>expect is that those individuals who are more submissive are also more likely
<DIV></DIV>
<P>>to be more aggressive than less submissive ones."</P>
<P>That makes sense. Submissive individuals are easier to coerce. I would not say that is the same as weaker individuals. My feeling is that a homogenous social context contributes to docility, utility and governmentality. When exernal influences dilute a homogenous social context stability declines:</P>
<P>- Japan in the past 10 years</P>
<P>- Western society in the past 50 years </P>
<P>The question is how are people made to </P></div><br clear=all><hr>STOP MORE SPAM with <a href="http://g.msn.com/8HMKEN/2015";>the new MSN 8</a> and get 2 months FREE*</html>
<DIV></DIV>> Professor Jorge M. Roche refines my metaphor "Warfare as Submission" by </DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>suggesting that if my hypothesis is correct, "What we might empirically
<DIV></DIV>>expect is that those individuals who are more submissive are also more likely
<DIV></DIV>
<P>>to be more aggressive than less submissive ones."</P>
<P>That makes sense. Submissive individuals are easier to coerce. I would not say that is the same as weaker individuals. My feeling is that a homogenous social context contributes to docility, utility and governmentality. When exernal influences dilute a homogenous social context stability declines:</P>
<P>- Japan in the past 10 years</P>
<P>- Western society in the past 50 years </P>
<P>The question is how are people made to </P></div><br clear=all><hr>STOP MORE SPAM with <a href="http://g.msn.com/8HMKEN/2015";>the new MSN 8</a> and get 2 months FREE*</html>