--0-466828956-1040384064=:47955
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
As i can understand television as a discoursive object should focus on the formation of public opinion... Remember that an objetc is a mere funtion of enunciation...
adr
"cvs. sarma" <cvssn@xxxxxxxx> wrote:Thanks for the suggestions. The way I want to look at it is to embed the
discussion within the parameters of "the objects". more precisely:
1. what are the surfaces of their emergence?
2. what are the authorities of delimitation? (is it just the market
research agencies, the academia,etc?)
3. what are the grids of specification?
4. what are the *secondary relations* in a television discourse?
5. when Foucault says, the *objects of discourse are at the limit of
discourse* how does it apply to say, audience research in television? or
textual analysis?
It would have been easy for me to go the anthropological way, and just say
that making a subject *strange* is the first step to dealing with it
intellectually/academically. but thats too easy and to me sounds shallow.
also, i needed something that could bring diverse fields together (political
economy, textual analysis, audience studies, psychoanalysis and the viewer,
feminist criticism, genres and so on, and the sweep seems possible with
Foucault.
does anyone know of resources/books/journal articles that deal with
television?
thanks for the suggestions so far.
C.V.S.Sarma
cvssn@xxxxxxxx
---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
Todo lo que quieres saber de Estados Unidos, América Latina y el resto del Mundo.
Visíta Yahoo! Noticias.
--0-466828956-1040384064=:47955
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<P>As i can understand television as a discoursive object should focus on the formation of public opinion... Remember that an objetc is a mere funtion of enunciation...
<P>adr
<P> <B><I>"cvs. sarma" <cvssn@xxxxxxxx></I></B> wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">Thanks for the suggestions. The way I want to look at it is to embed the<BR>discussion within the parameters of "the objects". more precisely:<BR><BR>1. what are the surfaces of their emergence?<BR>2. what are the authorities of delimitation? (is it just the market<BR>research agencies, the academia,etc?)<BR>3. what are the grids of specification?<BR>4. what are the *secondary relations* in a television discourse?<BR>5. when Foucault says, the *objects of discourse are at the limit of<BR>discourse* how does it apply to say, audience research in television? or<BR>textual analysis?<BR><BR>It would have been easy for me to go the anthropological way, and just say<BR>that making a subject *strange* is the first step to dealing with it<BR>intellectually/academically. but thats too easy and to me sounds shallow.<BR>also, i needed something that could bring diverse fields together (political<BR>economy, textual analysis, audience studies, psychoanalysis and the viewer,<BR>feminist criticism, genres and so on, and the sweep seems possible with<BR>Foucault.<BR><BR>does anyone know of resources/books/journal articles that deal with<BR>television?<BR><BR>thanks for the suggestions so far.<BR><BR>C.V.S.Sarma<BR>cvssn@xxxxxxxx<BR></BLOCKQUOTE><p><br><hr size=1 noshade><b>Do You Yahoo!?</b><br>
<a href=http://espanol.yahoo.com/mail_tagline/*http://espanol.news.yahoo.com><img src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/not/dailynews.gif"; width=30 height=26 border=0 align=left></a>
Todo lo que quieres saber de Estados Unidos, América Latina y el resto del Mundo.<br>
Visíta <a href=http://espanol.yahoo.com/mail_tagline/*http://espanol.news.yahoo.com>Yahoo! Noticias</a>.<br>
--0-466828956-1040384064=:47955--
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
As i can understand television as a discoursive object should focus on the formation of public opinion... Remember that an objetc is a mere funtion of enunciation...
adr
"cvs. sarma" <cvssn@xxxxxxxx> wrote:Thanks for the suggestions. The way I want to look at it is to embed the
discussion within the parameters of "the objects". more precisely:
1. what are the surfaces of their emergence?
2. what are the authorities of delimitation? (is it just the market
research agencies, the academia,etc?)
3. what are the grids of specification?
4. what are the *secondary relations* in a television discourse?
5. when Foucault says, the *objects of discourse are at the limit of
discourse* how does it apply to say, audience research in television? or
textual analysis?
It would have been easy for me to go the anthropological way, and just say
that making a subject *strange* is the first step to dealing with it
intellectually/academically. but thats too easy and to me sounds shallow.
also, i needed something that could bring diverse fields together (political
economy, textual analysis, audience studies, psychoanalysis and the viewer,
feminist criticism, genres and so on, and the sweep seems possible with
Foucault.
does anyone know of resources/books/journal articles that deal with
television?
thanks for the suggestions so far.
C.V.S.Sarma
cvssn@xxxxxxxx
---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
Todo lo que quieres saber de Estados Unidos, América Latina y el resto del Mundo.
Visíta Yahoo! Noticias.
--0-466828956-1040384064=:47955
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<P>As i can understand television as a discoursive object should focus on the formation of public opinion... Remember that an objetc is a mere funtion of enunciation...
<P>adr
<P> <B><I>"cvs. sarma" <cvssn@xxxxxxxx></I></B> wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">Thanks for the suggestions. The way I want to look at it is to embed the<BR>discussion within the parameters of "the objects". more precisely:<BR><BR>1. what are the surfaces of their emergence?<BR>2. what are the authorities of delimitation? (is it just the market<BR>research agencies, the academia,etc?)<BR>3. what are the grids of specification?<BR>4. what are the *secondary relations* in a television discourse?<BR>5. when Foucault says, the *objects of discourse are at the limit of<BR>discourse* how does it apply to say, audience research in television? or<BR>textual analysis?<BR><BR>It would have been easy for me to go the anthropological way, and just say<BR>that making a subject *strange* is the first step to dealing with it<BR>intellectually/academically. but thats too easy and to me sounds shallow.<BR>also, i needed something that could bring diverse fields together (political<BR>economy, textual analysis, audience studies, psychoanalysis and the viewer,<BR>feminist criticism, genres and so on, and the sweep seems possible with<BR>Foucault.<BR><BR>does anyone know of resources/books/journal articles that deal with<BR>television?<BR><BR>thanks for the suggestions so far.<BR><BR>C.V.S.Sarma<BR>cvssn@xxxxxxxx<BR></BLOCKQUOTE><p><br><hr size=1 noshade><b>Do You Yahoo!?</b><br>
<a href=http://espanol.yahoo.com/mail_tagline/*http://espanol.news.yahoo.com><img src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/not/dailynews.gif"; width=30 height=26 border=0 align=left></a>
![http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/not/dailynews.gif"](http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/not/dailynews.gif"){kind=link}
Todo lo que quieres saber de Estados Unidos, América Latina y el resto del Mundo.<br>
Visíta <a href=http://espanol.yahoo.com/mail_tagline/*http://espanol.news.yahoo.com>Yahoo! Noticias</a>.<br>
--0-466828956-1040384064=:47955--