I've read Han's book and strongly recommend it to anyone who hasn't. I
would be interested in discussing her thesis on the list too.
At 17:38 08/01/2003, you wrote:
>I am currently reading Han's book and finding it very interesting. I've
>always been interested in the subject of what ontology might be said to
>underlie Foucault, or indeed whether this kind of talk is at all
>appropriate. As far as Habermas goes, I don't know enough about him to be
>interested. I would be interested in any kind of virtual discussion on Han
>and/or Foucault's ontology.
would be interested in discussing her thesis on the list too.
At 17:38 08/01/2003, you wrote:
>I am currently reading Han's book and finding it very interesting. I've
>always been interested in the subject of what ontology might be said to
>underlie Foucault, or indeed whether this kind of talk is at all
>appropriate. As far as Habermas goes, I don't know enough about him to be
>interested. I would be interested in any kind of virtual discussion on Han
>and/or Foucault's ontology.