Josh
On the surface what you say may be true, but what motivated you to make this
reply? How has the drug gaze or drug discourse influenced your behaviour
and the wider moral order? Has drug discourse led to new rights, new
duties, new morals and new actions that people should engage in? In light
of what Stuart Eldon said, I think drug gase has had a resistance effect on
normalising tendencies of productive society.
Is this good or bad?
Will this lay foundations for a better world?
Lionel
Lionel Boxer - 0411267256 - lboxer@xxxxxxxxxxx
Attend MAAOE 03 --- Melbourne --- 20-22 Oct 03
http://www.intergon.net/maaoe
----------------------------------------------
In 1976 Michale Foucualt said: ... terrorism ... has a totally opposite
effect which is to make the bourgeois class even more closely attached to
its ideology ... (original in French) 'Le Savoir Comme Crime'
----------------------------------------------
>From: Josh Strawn <radicalchic68@xxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: Drug Gaze is as real as Medical Gaze, Judical gaze or Male
>Gaze
>Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 18:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
>
> > How has drug gaze become an issue that is
> > de-legitimised to be discussed on
> > this list (foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)?
> > What power / knowlege
> > relationship has led some people to deny it
> > legitimacy or worthy of
> > discussion? Why do some people want the list
> > moderated to eliminate this
> > discussion?
>
>in response to this, since i was one of those who
>suggested we scrap the discussion, i would say that
>none of the above were the reasons for my lack of
>interest in the topic. the discussion, until the past
>few days had involved very little analysis that would
>belong on a foucault mailing list. thankfully, the
>tides have turned and this issue seems to have brought
>everybody out of the cracks to discuss and suggest
>many things which do relate directly to the ideas put
>forward by foucault. i was mainly critical of the
>discussion because it seemed to be edging closer and
>closer to a pro/con drug discussion which seemed to
>me, in light of foucaults criticism of binaries,
>extremely out of place.
>
>__________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
>http://sbc.yahoo.com
_________________________________________________________________
Hot chart ringtones and polyphonics. Go to
http://ninemsn.com.au/share/redir/adTrack.asp?mode=click&clientID=174&referral=Hotmail_taglines_plain&URL=http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilemania/default.asp
On the surface what you say may be true, but what motivated you to make this
reply? How has the drug gaze or drug discourse influenced your behaviour
and the wider moral order? Has drug discourse led to new rights, new
duties, new morals and new actions that people should engage in? In light
of what Stuart Eldon said, I think drug gase has had a resistance effect on
normalising tendencies of productive society.
Is this good or bad?
Will this lay foundations for a better world?
Lionel
Lionel Boxer - 0411267256 - lboxer@xxxxxxxxxxx
Attend MAAOE 03 --- Melbourne --- 20-22 Oct 03
http://www.intergon.net/maaoe
----------------------------------------------
In 1976 Michale Foucualt said: ... terrorism ... has a totally opposite
effect which is to make the bourgeois class even more closely attached to
its ideology ... (original in French) 'Le Savoir Comme Crime'
----------------------------------------------
>From: Josh Strawn <radicalchic68@xxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: Drug Gaze is as real as Medical Gaze, Judical gaze or Male
>Gaze
>Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 18:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
>
> > How has drug gaze become an issue that is
> > de-legitimised to be discussed on
> > this list (foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)?
> > What power / knowlege
> > relationship has led some people to deny it
> > legitimacy or worthy of
> > discussion? Why do some people want the list
> > moderated to eliminate this
> > discussion?
>
>in response to this, since i was one of those who
>suggested we scrap the discussion, i would say that
>none of the above were the reasons for my lack of
>interest in the topic. the discussion, until the past
>few days had involved very little analysis that would
>belong on a foucault mailing list. thankfully, the
>tides have turned and this issue seems to have brought
>everybody out of the cracks to discuss and suggest
>many things which do relate directly to the ideas put
>forward by foucault. i was mainly critical of the
>discussion because it seemed to be edging closer and
>closer to a pro/con drug discussion which seemed to
>me, in light of foucaults criticism of binaries,
>extremely out of place.
>
>__________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
>http://sbc.yahoo.com
_________________________________________________________________
Hot chart ringtones and polyphonics. Go to
http://ninemsn.com.au/share/redir/adTrack.asp?mode=click&clientID=174&referral=Hotmail_taglines_plain&URL=http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilemania/default.asp