I think Australian nationalist discourse is in a conceptual riptide at the
moment. I've written an article about this and Society Must Be Defended,
which I'm hoping contretemps will publish in their next issue.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lionel Boxer" <lboxer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: Acronyms and Republicanism
> You are right, vacuous because I was pissed and emotive when I typed it; I
> had just returned from a drinking session with some monarchists !-) I am
> surprised the spelling was so accurate!
>
> Having said that, what remains if a nation's heritage is dumped. The risk
> is that whatever is the most appealing to the widest population becomes
> adopted for as long as it remains in vogue. Or am I still intoxicated
with
> an out of date discourse?
moment. I've written an article about this and Society Must Be Defended,
which I'm hoping contretemps will publish in their next issue.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lionel Boxer" <lboxer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: Acronyms and Republicanism
> You are right, vacuous because I was pissed and emotive when I typed it; I
> had just returned from a drinking session with some monarchists !-) I am
> surprised the spelling was so accurate!
>
> Having said that, what remains if a nation's heritage is dumped. The risk
> is that whatever is the most appealing to the widest population becomes
> adopted for as long as it remains in vogue. Or am I still intoxicated
with
> an out of date discourse?