Hello Iara and Leon,
When i quote those texts, i was aiming to a debete
around the book of Beatrice Han. Han try to criticize
Foucault pointing contradictions in the arguments,
that would be contouring with the posteiror creation
of new concepts, like "archive", "discursive
formation", "savoir", and others. Each new foucauldian
book would be created to resolve ancient problems,
since NC, in the view of Han. But that quotes (of 66
and 64) show the concept of 'archive' in a curious
co-existence with other 'older' concepts. For example,
if Foucault´s state the term 'archive' in 1964 (even
without formalize it), which other concepts would be
coexisting with it? 1964 is between NC and OT!
it´s a good question
best regards,
Marcio Luiz Miotto
ps: we can talk in portuguese about it too, at the
'oestrangeiro' list; what do you think?
_______________________________________________________
Novo Yahoo! Messenger com voz: ligações, Yahoo! Avatars, novos emoticons e muito mais. Instale agora!
www.yahoo.com.br/messenger/
When i quote those texts, i was aiming to a debete
around the book of Beatrice Han. Han try to criticize
Foucault pointing contradictions in the arguments,
that would be contouring with the posteiror creation
of new concepts, like "archive", "discursive
formation", "savoir", and others. Each new foucauldian
book would be created to resolve ancient problems,
since NC, in the view of Han. But that quotes (of 66
and 64) show the concept of 'archive' in a curious
co-existence with other 'older' concepts. For example,
if Foucault´s state the term 'archive' in 1964 (even
without formalize it), which other concepts would be
coexisting with it? 1964 is between NC and OT!
it´s a good question
best regards,
Marcio Luiz Miotto
ps: we can talk in portuguese about it too, at the
'oestrangeiro' list; what do you think?
_______________________________________________________
Novo Yahoo! Messenger com voz: ligações, Yahoo! Avatars, novos emoticons e muito mais. Instale agora!
www.yahoo.com.br/messenger/