Angela
I will look at the blog, first I'll try and get my head round the essay. I
think also law and right might be becoming mixed up as they go from French
to Italian to English. I am gonna have a look around.
But this as you suggest is the question
whether it's possible, or desirable
I am not sure the answer is yes to either! Ithink also here is where the
nomos and the logos debate all comes into play .... and this is all in my
face as I try to teach first year Aboriginal law students sitting on the
threshold of both.
take care
it was 35 degrees in Geelong yesterday so enjoy the north!
M
On 14/03/2008, s0metim3s <s0metim3s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure how productive - there's some tensions between the speech
> ("Face aux gouvernements, les droits l'Homme") and the 1976 lecture at the
> College de France that are interesting to work through. But, it's been over
> a year since a number of people tried, on the basis of these texts, to
> relaunch their humanism by insisting that Foucault was one.
> <http://archive.blogsome.com/2006/09/06/foucault-rights/>
> <http://archive.blogsome.com/2006/09/09/no-one/>.
>
> Though I suspect, Martin, our disagreements over whether one seeks the
> redefine the very notion of right (whether it's possible, or desirable) will
> continue.
>
> best,
>
> Angela
>
>
> martin hardie wrote:
> > Hi everyone
> >
> > Angela's lead hs proved productive, not the text by Catherine Mills,
> > but the author herself has told me that Foucault calls for a "new
> > right" that is no longer tied to sovereignty or discipline in the
> > second lecture of the "Two Lectures" essay published in
> > Power/Knowledge.
> >
> > That is a start on the quest to find this discarded object of the
> > playground!
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 03/03/2008, martin hardie <martin.hardie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> HI everyone
> >>
> >> Something I have wondered for a while and it has resurfaced.
> >>
> >> There is a reference to Foucault and the new lawy/er on page 63 of
> >> Giorgio Agamben's State of Exception. Agamben doesn't reference
> >> Foucault at all in the text. Does anyone know where this is from?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >>
> >> martin
> >>
> >>
> >> -- Martin Hardie Law Lecturer Institute of Koorie Education, Deakin
> >> University (Geelong Campus) Pigdons Road, Waurn Ponds, Victoria,
> >> 3216, Australia. http://www.deakin.edu.au/ike/ Tel: +61 (0)3 5227
> >> 2918 Fax: + 61 (0)3 5227 2019 Mobile: + 61 (0)433281779
> >> mhardie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx martin.hardie@xxxxxxxxx skype/irc: auskadi
> >>
> >>
> >> "I write so that people remember that I was here," Miguel de
> >> Unamuno
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> ___angela mitropoulos ____________ mobile/sms= +44
> (0)7964 086656 | skype= s0metim3s_skype | allpeers=
> s0metim3s_roaming
> ___________________________________________________________
> //
> _______________________________________________
> Foucault-L mailing list
>
--
Martin Hardie
Law Lecturer
Institute of Koorie Education,
Deakin University (Geelong Campus)
Pigdons Road, Waurn Ponds,
Victoria, 3216, Australia.
http://www.deakin.edu.au/ike/
Tel: +61 (0)3 5227 2918
Fax: + 61 (0)3 5227 2019
mhardie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
martin.hardie@xxxxxxxxx
skype/irc: auskadi
Love is never directed toward this or that property of the loved one (being
blond, being small, being tender, being lame), but neither does it neglect
the properties in favour of an insipid generality (universal love): The
lover want the loved one with all of its predicates, its being such as it
is.
I will look at the blog, first I'll try and get my head round the essay. I
think also law and right might be becoming mixed up as they go from French
to Italian to English. I am gonna have a look around.
But this as you suggest is the question
whether it's possible, or desirable
I am not sure the answer is yes to either! Ithink also here is where the
nomos and the logos debate all comes into play .... and this is all in my
face as I try to teach first year Aboriginal law students sitting on the
threshold of both.
take care
it was 35 degrees in Geelong yesterday so enjoy the north!
M
On 14/03/2008, s0metim3s <s0metim3s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure how productive - there's some tensions between the speech
> ("Face aux gouvernements, les droits l'Homme") and the 1976 lecture at the
> College de France that are interesting to work through. But, it's been over
> a year since a number of people tried, on the basis of these texts, to
> relaunch their humanism by insisting that Foucault was one.
> <http://archive.blogsome.com/2006/09/06/foucault-rights/>
> <http://archive.blogsome.com/2006/09/09/no-one/>.
>
> Though I suspect, Martin, our disagreements over whether one seeks the
> redefine the very notion of right (whether it's possible, or desirable) will
> continue.
>
> best,
>
> Angela
>
>
> martin hardie wrote:
> > Hi everyone
> >
> > Angela's lead hs proved productive, not the text by Catherine Mills,
> > but the author herself has told me that Foucault calls for a "new
> > right" that is no longer tied to sovereignty or discipline in the
> > second lecture of the "Two Lectures" essay published in
> > Power/Knowledge.
> >
> > That is a start on the quest to find this discarded object of the
> > playground!
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 03/03/2008, martin hardie <martin.hardie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> HI everyone
> >>
> >> Something I have wondered for a while and it has resurfaced.
> >>
> >> There is a reference to Foucault and the new lawy/er on page 63 of
> >> Giorgio Agamben's State of Exception. Agamben doesn't reference
> >> Foucault at all in the text. Does anyone know where this is from?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >>
> >> martin
> >>
> >>
> >> -- Martin Hardie Law Lecturer Institute of Koorie Education, Deakin
> >> University (Geelong Campus) Pigdons Road, Waurn Ponds, Victoria,
> >> 3216, Australia. http://www.deakin.edu.au/ike/ Tel: +61 (0)3 5227
> >> 2918 Fax: + 61 (0)3 5227 2019 Mobile: + 61 (0)433281779
> >> mhardie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx martin.hardie@xxxxxxxxx skype/irc: auskadi
> >>
> >>
> >> "I write so that people remember that I was here," Miguel de
> >> Unamuno
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> ___angela mitropoulos ____________ mobile/sms= +44
> (0)7964 086656 | skype= s0metim3s_skype | allpeers=
> s0metim3s_roaming
> ___________________________________________________________
> //
> _______________________________________________
> Foucault-L mailing list
>
--
Martin Hardie
Law Lecturer
Institute of Koorie Education,
Deakin University (Geelong Campus)
Pigdons Road, Waurn Ponds,
Victoria, 3216, Australia.
http://www.deakin.edu.au/ike/
Tel: +61 (0)3 5227 2918
Fax: + 61 (0)3 5227 2019
mhardie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
martin.hardie@xxxxxxxxx
skype/irc: auskadi
Love is never directed toward this or that property of the loved one (being
blond, being small, being tender, being lame), but neither does it neglect
the properties in favour of an insipid generality (universal love): The
lover want the loved one with all of its predicates, its being such as it
is.