A timely question Jason, and a timely suggestion Sam! I was just looking for
recent work on the term!
Cheers,
Edwin
2008/6/18 Sam Binkley <Samuel_Binkley@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> it's not completely clear whether its his own neologism or something
> else, but milchman and rosenberg provide a great discussion of the
> term and its translations here:
>
> http://www.parrhesiajournal.org/parrhesia02/parrhesia02_milchrosen.pdf
>
> sam
>
>
> On Jun 17, 2008, at 6:47 PM, Jason Weidner wrote:
>
> >
> > Does anyone know, is the word "assujetissement" a Foucauldian
> > neologism or did the word already exists before Foucault used it?
> >
> > Jason R. Weidner
> > PhD. candidate, Department of International Relations
> > Florida International University
> > Miami, FL USA
> > _______________________________________________
> > Foucault-L mailing list
>
> ________________________________
> Sam Binkley
> Emerson College
>
> _______________________________________________
> Foucault-L mailing list
>
recent work on the term!
Cheers,
Edwin
2008/6/18 Sam Binkley <Samuel_Binkley@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> it's not completely clear whether its his own neologism or something
> else, but milchman and rosenberg provide a great discussion of the
> term and its translations here:
>
> http://www.parrhesiajournal.org/parrhesia02/parrhesia02_milchrosen.pdf
>
> sam
>
>
> On Jun 17, 2008, at 6:47 PM, Jason Weidner wrote:
>
> >
> > Does anyone know, is the word "assujetissement" a Foucauldian
> > neologism or did the word already exists before Foucault used it?
> >
> > Jason R. Weidner
> > PhD. candidate, Department of International Relations
> > Florida International University
> > Miami, FL USA
> > _______________________________________________
> > Foucault-L mailing list
>
> ________________________________
> Sam Binkley
> Emerson College
>
> _______________________________________________
> Foucault-L mailing list
>