Chetan,
I'm not a fan of the Archaeology. I like structuralism. I respect what
Foucault was trying to do in that work, but it's an interesting
footnote to his corpus only, IMO. I have more to say about it in the
book :p
Mark
2009/1/26 Chetan Vemuri <aryavartacnsrn@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Some think The Archaeology of Knowledge is a quirky text whose program can
> be used in parts and that its impractical to apply his entire method as
> detailed in the entire book.
> I disagree with this criticism as I think there are successful ways of
> utilizing the full program and potent of The Archaeology.
> any ideas?
>
> --
> Chetan Vemuri
> West Des Moines, IA
> aryavartacnsrn@xxxxxxxxx
> (515)-418-2771
> "You say you want a Revolution! Well you know, we all want to change the
> world"
> _______________________________________________
> Foucault-L mailing list
>
I'm not a fan of the Archaeology. I like structuralism. I respect what
Foucault was trying to do in that work, but it's an interesting
footnote to his corpus only, IMO. I have more to say about it in the
book :p
Mark
2009/1/26 Chetan Vemuri <aryavartacnsrn@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Some think The Archaeology of Knowledge is a quirky text whose program can
> be used in parts and that its impractical to apply his entire method as
> detailed in the entire book.
> I disagree with this criticism as I think there are successful ways of
> utilizing the full program and potent of The Archaeology.
> any ideas?
>
> --
> Chetan Vemuri
> West Des Moines, IA
> aryavartacnsrn@xxxxxxxxx
> (515)-418-2771
> "You say you want a Revolution! Well you know, we all want to change the
> world"
> _______________________________________________
> Foucault-L mailing list
>