For clarification, that email was supposed to be a reply to an
off-list inquiry to me from Chetan as part of an ongoing discussion
between us, which unfortunately I confused with his post to the list
in my inbox – the flippancy of my previous email does not reflect my
considered views about the Archaeology of Knowledge (although it is
indeed indicative of my general attitude to it).
Mark Kelly
Lecturer in Philosophy
Centre for Research in Modern European Philosophy
Middlesex University
London N14 4YZ
http://www.mdx.ac.uk/www/crmep/STAFF/MarkKelly.htm
2009/1/26 Mark Kelly <mkel0839@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Chetan,
>
> I'm not a fan of the Archaeology. I like structuralism. I respect what
> Foucault was trying to do in that work, but it's an interesting
> footnote to his corpus only, IMO. I have more to say about it in the
> book :p
>
> Mark
>
> 2009/1/26 Chetan Vemuri <aryavartacnsrn@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> Some think The Archaeology of Knowledge is a quirky text whose program can
>> be used in parts and that its impractical to apply his entire method as
>> detailed in the entire book.
>> I disagree with this criticism as I think there are successful ways of
>> utilizing the full program and potent of The Archaeology.
>> any ideas?
>>
>> --
>> Chetan Vemuri
>> West Des Moines, IA
>> aryavartacnsrn@xxxxxxxxx
>> (515)-418-2771
>> "You say you want a Revolution! Well you know, we all want to change the
>> world"
>> _______________________________________________
>> Foucault-L mailing list
>>
>
off-list inquiry to me from Chetan as part of an ongoing discussion
between us, which unfortunately I confused with his post to the list
in my inbox – the flippancy of my previous email does not reflect my
considered views about the Archaeology of Knowledge (although it is
indeed indicative of my general attitude to it).
Mark Kelly
Lecturer in Philosophy
Centre for Research in Modern European Philosophy
Middlesex University
London N14 4YZ
http://www.mdx.ac.uk/www/crmep/STAFF/MarkKelly.htm
2009/1/26 Mark Kelly <mkel0839@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Chetan,
>
> I'm not a fan of the Archaeology. I like structuralism. I respect what
> Foucault was trying to do in that work, but it's an interesting
> footnote to his corpus only, IMO. I have more to say about it in the
> book :p
>
> Mark
>
> 2009/1/26 Chetan Vemuri <aryavartacnsrn@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> Some think The Archaeology of Knowledge is a quirky text whose program can
>> be used in parts and that its impractical to apply his entire method as
>> detailed in the entire book.
>> I disagree with this criticism as I think there are successful ways of
>> utilizing the full program and potent of The Archaeology.
>> any ideas?
>>
>> --
>> Chetan Vemuri
>> West Des Moines, IA
>> aryavartacnsrn@xxxxxxxxx
>> (515)-418-2771
>> "You say you want a Revolution! Well you know, we all want to change the
>> world"
>> _______________________________________________
>> Foucault-L mailing list
>>
>