Hi I've been looking for Jason Weidner's email address- I'd like to talk to
him about his call for papers on Foucault and Civil Society- I was wondering
if he could shoot me a quick email, or if someone could send me his email?
Thanks so much,
Matthew
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 3:53 PM, <foucault-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Send Foucault-L mailing list submissions to
> foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://foucault.info/mailman/listinfo/foucault-l
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> foucault-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> foucault-l-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Foucault-L digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Fwd: [PL] Query re. Foucault, Heidegger, the internet
> (Timothy O'Leary)
> 2. Info on foucauldian research in France (goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx)
> 3. Re : Info on foucauldian research in France (emmanuel pehau)
> 4. Re: Re : Info on foucauldian research in France
> (tp2277@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
> 5. Re: Info on foucauldian research in France (David McInerney)
> 6. Re: Info on foucauldian research in France (Chetan Vemuri)
> 7. looking for text (Michael Maidan)
> 8. Re: looking for text (Douglas Olena)
> 9. Re: looking for text (Timothy O'Leary)
> 10. Re: looking for text (Douglas Olena)
> 11. Re: looking for text (M. Karskens)
> 12. Re: Info on foucauldian research in France (james)
> 13. Jules Vuillemin (Paul Taborsky)
> 14. Re: Jules Vuillemin (pong naiyavitit)
> 15. Using the forum (ian.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
> 16. Foucault and interpretivism (ian.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
> 17. Re: Foucault and interpretivism (David McInerney)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 09:08:28 +0800
> From: "Timothy O'Leary" <autrement@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [Foucault-L] Fwd: [PL] Query re. Foucault, Heidegger, the
> internet
> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID:
> <fc06d9820905101808lfb1fc05q53f86d41cc81ed34@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Dear Foucault List,
> I am forwarding this from another philosophy list - it should get more
> responses here.
> Timothy
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Patience Moll <patiencemoll@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, May 11, 2009 at 7:36 AM
> Subject: [PL] Query re. Foucault, Heidegger, the internet
> To: PHILOS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> Dear all,
> I have another query for a student of mine pursuing a research project that
> analyzes the implications of the internet in terms of Foucault's theory of
> biopower/biopolitics and Heidegger's writings on technology. He is trying
> to argue that Heidegger's ontology is more successful than Foucault's
> theory
> of biopolitics for analyzing what is at stake, politically and ethically,
> in
> the development of the internet.
>
> If anyone knows of secondary material that directly addresses the internet
> in light of Foucault's and/or Heidegger's thinking, could you please send
> the reference to me off-list at patiencemoll@xxxxxxxxxxx?
>
> Thank you very much, and thanks to those who responded to my earlier query
> re. bioethics and sustainability.
>
> Patience Moll
> Lecturer
> Humanities Core Program
> U.C. Irvine
>
> ------------------------------
> Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail?. See
> how.<
> http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_QuickAdd1_052009
> >
> Messages to the list are archived at
> http://listserv.liv.ac.uk/archives/philos-l.html. Prolonged discussions
> should be moved to chora: enrol via
> http://listserv.liv.ac.uk/archives/chora.html. Other philosophical
> resources
> on the Web can be found at http://www.liv.ac.uk/pal.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 18:36:56 +0200
> From: <goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [Foucault-L] Info on foucauldian research in France
> To: Foucault-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <11560551.1242146216491.JavaMail.root@fep-13>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if anyone could help me with the following problem:
>
> while browsing through post-graduate "brochures" of French universities,
> especially that of EHESS's department of Political Science (who's research
> centre is named Raymond Aron - I am well aware of that) I could not find
> anyone (meaning professors) whose work would primarily deal with Michel
> Foucault (I have browsed through JSTOR, SAGE and persee.fr).
>
> The question is therefore the following: is the university
> Vincennes-St.Denis ?the (only) place? in France where foucauldian research
> is being conducted or has it become (because of it's ?nature?) so dispersed
> that it is everywhere yet nowhere??
>
> If someone could direct me to some/one/place with usefull information it
> would be greatelly appreciated.
>
>
> Best Regards, Goran Gaber
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 18:26:29 +0000 (GMT)
> From: emmanuel pehau <klossi_fr@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [Foucault-L] Re : Info on foucauldian research in France
> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <751079.20364.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> Hi, Goran.
>
> I've been studying philosophy at Vincennes for the last two years. As far
> as I know, it's the only place in France were foucaldian studies are part of
> the "daily meal". (And yes, it's one of the many reasons I'm there.)
>
> Emmanuel.
>
>
> ________________________________
> De : "goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx" <goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx>
> ? : Foucault-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Envoy? le : Mardi, 12 Mai 2009, 18h36mn 56s
> Objet : [Foucault-L] Info on foucauldian research in France
>
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if anyone could help me with the following problem:
>
> while browsing through post-graduate "brochures" of French universities,
> especially that of EHESS's department of Political Science (who's research
> centre is named Raymond Aron - I am well aware of that) I could not find
> anyone (meaning professors) whose work would primarily deal with Michel
> Foucault (I have browsed through JSTOR, SAGE and persee.fr).
>
> The question is therefore the following: is the university
> Vincennes-St.Denis ?the (only) place? in France where foucauldian research
> is being conducted or has it become (because of it's ?nature?) so dispersed
> that it is everywhere yet nowhere??
>
> If someone could direct me to some/one/place with usefull information it
> would be greatelly appreciated.
>
>
> Best Regards, Goran Gaber
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Foucault-L mailing list
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 14:31:31 -0400
> From: tp2277@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Re : Info on foucauldian research in France
> To: foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <20090512143131.6utxxplm8skcocsw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes";
> format="flowed"
>
> Hi, I do not know what you are looking for : a professor working on
> foucault or a place to do your phd where there would be people working
> on F. Anyway, you could get in touch with Frederic Gros, who is
> teaching at Paris XII and Sciences Po and who just edited the last
> (for now) of the courses of the college de france
> t.
>
> Citando emmanuel pehau <klossi_fr@xxxxxxxx>:
>
> > Hi, Goran.
> >
> > I've been studying philosophy at Vincennes for the last two years.
> > As far as I know, it's the only place in France were foucaldian
> > studies are part of the "daily meal". (And yes, it's one of the many
> > reasons I'm there.)
> >
> > Emmanuel.
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > De : "goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx" <goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx>
> > ? : Foucault-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Envoy? le : Mardi, 12 Mai 2009, 18h36mn 56s
> > Objet : [Foucault-L] Info on foucauldian research in France
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was wondering if anyone could help me with the following problem:
> >
> > while browsing through post-graduate "brochures" of French
> > universities, especially that of EHESS's department of Political
> > Science (who's research centre is named Raymond Aron - I am well
> > aware of that) I could not find anyone (meaning professors) whose
> > work would primarily deal with Michel Foucault (I have browsed
> > through JSTOR, SAGE and persee.fr).
> >
> > The question is therefore the following: is the university
> > Vincennes-St.Denis ?the (only) place? in France where foucauldian
> > research is being conducted or has it become (because of it's
> > ?nature?) so dispersed that it is everywhere yet nowhere??
> >
> > If someone could direct me to some/one/place with usefull
> > information it would be greatelly appreciated.
> >
> >
> > Best Regards, Goran Gaber
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Foucault-L mailing list
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Foucault-L mailing list
>
>
>
> Teresa Pullano
> Sciences Po Paris
> Fulbright-Schuman Postdoctoral Fellow
> Department of Political Science
> Columbia University
> New York
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 07:28:10 +0930
> From: David McInerney <vagabond@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Info on foucauldian research in France
> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <BD124F2C-589F-4D30-8655-4A738A01A952@xxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; delsp=yes;
> format=flowed
>
> This is an interesting problem.
>
> You would perhaps be best to speak to someone in France about it.
> I'm not sure that there are people in France who spend their whole
> lives studying Foucault - perhaps he's just not that exotic to
> them? Pierre Macherey for example has written important essays
> Foucault, but his main interest is in Spinoza, and he seems to have
> written at least as much on Canguilhem (who I believe supervised both
> him and Foucault) as on Foucault. He is retired now but maybe
> someone at his university (Lille III) is also working on Foucault.
> If you are comfortable speaking and writing in French you might try
> there. I know of at least two people from English-speaking countries
> who studied there with him in the 1990s.
>
> Here's his website: http://stl.recherche.univ-lille3.fr/
> sitespersonnels/macherey/accueilmacherey.html
>
>
> On 13/05/2009, at 2:06 AM, <goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was wondering if anyone could help me with the following problem:
> >
> > while browsing through post-graduate "brochures" of French
> > universities, especially that of EHESS's department of Political
> > Science (who's research centre is named Raymond Aron - I am well
> > aware of that) I could not find anyone (meaning professors) whose
> > work would primarily deal with Michel Foucault (I have browsed
> > through JSTOR, SAGE and persee.fr).
> >
> > The question is therefore the following: is the university
> > Vincennes-St.Denis ?the (only) place? in France where foucauldian
> > research is being conducted or has it become (because of it's
> > ?nature?) so dispersed that it is everywhere yet nowhere??
> >
> > If someone could direct me to some/one/place with usefull
> > information it would be greatelly appreciated.
> >
> >
> > Best Regards, Goran Gaber
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Foucault-L mailing list
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 17:40:46 -0500
> From: Chetan Vemuri <aryavartacnsrn@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Info on foucauldian research in France
> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID:
> <34cd98ba0905121540l232d735bgd5eb80eed6130c2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>
> University of Paris VII (I think that's it?) has Frederic Gros, who has
> edited and transcribed the lectures for 82, 83 and 84. A respected French
> scholar on Foucault.
> There is also Michel Senellart, but I forget where he works.
>
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 4:58 PM, David McInerney <vagabond@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> > This is an interesting problem.
> >
> > You would perhaps be best to speak to someone in France about it.
> > I'm not sure that there are people in France who spend their whole
> > lives studying Foucault - perhaps he's just not that exotic to
> > them? Pierre Macherey for example has written important essays
> > Foucault, but his main interest is in Spinoza, and he seems to have
> > written at least as much on Canguilhem (who I believe supervised both
> > him and Foucault) as on Foucault. He is retired now but maybe
> > someone at his university (Lille III) is also working on Foucault.
> > If you are comfortable speaking and writing in French you might try
> > there. I know of at least two people from English-speaking countries
> > who studied there with him in the 1990s.
> >
> > Here's his website: http://stl.recherche.univ-lille3.fr/
> > sitespersonnels/macherey/accueilmacherey.html
> >
> >
> > On 13/05/2009, at 2:06 AM, <goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I was wondering if anyone could help me with the following problem:
> > >
> > > while browsing through post-graduate "brochures" of French
> > > universities, especially that of EHESS's department of Political
> > > Science (who's research centre is named Raymond Aron - I am well
> > > aware of that) I could not find anyone (meaning professors) whose
> > > work would primarily deal with Michel Foucault (I have browsed
> > > through JSTOR, SAGE and persee.fr).
> > >
> > > The question is therefore the following: is the university
> > > Vincennes-St.Denis ?the (only) place? in France where foucauldian
> > > research is being conducted or has it become (because of it's
> > > ?nature?) so dispersed that it is everywhere yet nowhere??
> > >
> > > If someone could direct me to some/one/place with usefull
> > > information it would be greatelly appreciated.
> > >
> > >
> > > Best Regards, Goran Gaber
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Foucault-L mailing list
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Foucault-L mailing list
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Chetan Vemuri
> West Des Moines, IA
> aryavartacnsrn@xxxxxxxxx
> (319)-512-9318
> "You say you want a Revolution! Well you know, we all want to change the
> world"
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 17:44:08 -0400
> From: Michael Maidan <michael.maidan@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [Foucault-L] looking for text
> To: foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID:
> <b7a8c9f40905131444m714b9b3fl85848279c462e611@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Dear members of Foucault List,
>
>
>
> I am looking for the following text:
>
> *Foucault, Qu'est-ce que la critique ? (Critique et Aufkl?rung), Bulletin
> de la societe franciase de philosophie, **n?1990 84 2
> This is the text F's conference in 1978. is not in DE.
>
> Thanks for your asistance.
>
> Rgds,
>
>
> Michael Maidan
>
> *
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 18:04:35 -0500
> From: Douglas Olena <doug@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] looking for text
> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <160E2F4C-3C30-4CCD-AED3-C944E1D7F84B@xxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed;
> delsp=yes
>
> There is a reference to the essay in michel-foucault-archives
> http://www.michel-foucault-archives.org/spip.php?rubrique7&id_article=44
> during mai. But I can't find it in Dits et ?crits for 1978.
>
> An English translation can be found in Semiotext(e) The Politics of
> Truth.
>
> Doug
>
> ------------------------
> Douglas F. Olena
> doug@xxxxxxxxx
> http://olena.com/wordpress1/
> ------------------------
>
> On May 13, 2009, at 4:44 PM, Michael Maidan wrote:
>
> > Qu'est-ce que la critique
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 09:21:35 +0800
> From: "Timothy O'Leary" <autrement@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] looking for text
> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID:
> <fc06d9820905131821m31c52f5by8c8f3dc2c507cf0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Dear Michael,
>
> as far as I know, the only French publication of that text is still the
> original from 1990 in the Bulletin...
>
> It's well worth trying to get a copy of this (through inter-library loan?),
> as it contains a transcript of the Q&A session after the talk that is not
> in
> the English translation (unless it's in the new Semiotext(e) edition?).
>
> Timothy
>
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:44 AM, Michael Maidan <michael.maidan@xxxxxxxxx
> >wrote:
>
> > Dear members of Foucault List,
> >
> >
> >
> > I am looking for the following text:
> >
> > *Foucault, Qu'est-ce que la critique ? (Critique et Aufkl?rung),
> Bulletin
> > de la societe franciase de philosophie, **n?1990 84 2
> > This is the text F's conference in 1978. is not in DE.
> >
> > Thanks for your asistance.
> >
> > Rgds,
> >
> >
> > Michael Maidan
> >
> > *
> > _______________________________________________
> > Foucault-L mailing list
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 20:27:19 -0500
> From: Douglas Olena <doug@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] looking for text
> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <CE8D1BC1-1B41-4CEB-9E13-793AE0C46A13@xxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes
>
> the Q&A is in the Semiotext(e) English edition
>
> Doug
>
> ------------------------
> Douglas F. Olena
> doug@xxxxxxxxx
> http://olena.com/wordpress1/
> ------------------------
>
> On May 13, 2009, at 8:21 PM, Timothy O'Leary wrote:
>
> > Dear Michael,
> >
> > as far as I know, the only French publication of that text is still
> > the
> > original from 1990 in the Bulletin...
> >
> > It's well worth trying to get a copy of this (through inter-library
> > loan?),
> > as it contains a transcript of the Q&A session after the talk that
> > is not in
> > the English translation (unless it's in the new Semiotext(e)
> > edition?).
> >
> > Timothy
> >
> >
> > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:44 AM, Michael Maidan <
> michael.maidan@xxxxxxxxx
> > >wrote:
> >
> >> Dear members of Foucault List,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I am looking for the following text:
> >>
> >> *Foucault, Qu'est-ce que la critique ? (Critique et Aufkl?rung),
> >> Bulletin
> >> de la societe franciase de philosophie, **n?1990 84 2
> >> This is the text F's conference in 1978. is not in DE.
> >>
> >> Thanks for your asistance.
> >>
> >> Rgds,
> >>
> >>
> >> Michael Maidan
> >>
> >> *
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Foucault-L mailing list
> > _______________________________________________
> > Foucault-L mailing list
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 12:09:37 +0200
> From: "M. Karskens" <mkarskens@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] looking for text
> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <20090514100932.F4118C7096@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed
>
> a complete English translation of the conference
> and the discussion can be found in The
> Political ed. David Ingram, Blackwell 2002, pp. 191-211.
>
> yours
> machiel karskens
>
>
>
>
> At 23:44 13-5-2009, you wrote:
> >Dear members of Foucault List, I am looking for
> >the following text: *Foucault, Qu'est-ce que la
> >critique ? (Critique et Aufkl??rung), Bulletin
> >de la societe franciase de philosophie,
> >**n??1990 84 2 This is the text F's conference
> >in 1978. is not in DE. Thanks for your
> >asistance. Rgds, Michael Maidan *
> >_______________________________________________ Foucault-L mailing list
>
>
>
>
> Prof. Machiel Karskens
> social and political philosophy
> Faculty of Philosophy
> Radboud University Nijmegen - The Netherlands
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 15:13:55 -0400
> From: james <spatium@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Info on foucauldian research in France
> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID:
> <c74774220905161213i4947cb2o6d293934adc10b67@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>
> Michel Senellart was at ENS-LSH in Lyon last time I was there.
>
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Chetan Vemuri <aryavartacnsrn@xxxxxxxxx
> >wrote:
>
> > University of Paris VII (I think that's it?) has Frederic Gros, who has
> > edited and transcribed the lectures for 82, 83 and 84. A respected French
> > scholar on Foucault.
> > There is also Michel Senellart, but I forget where he works.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 4:58 PM, David McInerney <vagabond@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > This is an interesting problem.
> > >
> > > You would perhaps be best to speak to someone in France about it.
> > > I'm not sure that there are people in France who spend their whole
> > > lives studying Foucault - perhaps he's just not that exotic to
> > > them? Pierre Macherey for example has written important essays
> > > Foucault, but his main interest is in Spinoza, and he seems to have
> > > written at least as much on Canguilhem (who I believe supervised both
> > > him and Foucault) as on Foucault. He is retired now but maybe
> > > someone at his university (Lille III) is also working on Foucault.
> > > If you are comfortable speaking and writing in French you might try
> > > there. I know of at least two people from English-speaking countries
> > > who studied there with him in the 1990s.
> > >
> > > Here's his website: http://stl.recherche.univ-lille3.fr/
> > > sitespersonnels/macherey/accueilmacherey.html
> > >
> > >
> > > On 13/05/2009, at 2:06 AM, <goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I was wondering if anyone could help me with the following problem:
> > > >
> > > > while browsing through post-graduate "brochures" of French
> > > > universities, especially that of EHESS's department of Political
> > > > Science (who's research centre is named Raymond Aron - I am well
> > > > aware of that) I could not find anyone (meaning professors) whose
> > > > work would primarily deal with Michel Foucault (I have browsed
> > > > through JSTOR, SAGE and persee.fr).
> > > >
> > > > The question is therefore the following: is the university
> > > > Vincennes-St.Denis ?the (only) place? in France where foucauldian
> > > > research is being conducted or has it become (because of it's
> > > > ?nature?) so dispersed that it is everywhere yet nowhere??
> > > >
> > > > If someone could direct me to some/one/place with usefull
> > > > information it would be greatelly appreciated.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards, Goran Gaber
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Foucault-L mailing list
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Foucault-L mailing list
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Chetan Vemuri
> > West Des Moines, IA
> > aryavartacnsrn@xxxxxxxxx
> > (319)-512-9318
> > "You say you want a Revolution! Well you know, we all want to change the
> > world"
> > _______________________________________________
> > Foucault-L mailing list
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 19:28:11 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Paul Taborsky <pdtaborsky@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [Foucault-L] Jules Vuillemin
> To: foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <564631.80496.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> I have been reading Jules Vuillemin's 'L'Heritage Kantienne et la
> revolution copernicienne: Fichte - Cohen - Heidegger', (1954), and it is
> obvious that a great deal of Foucault's ideas about the post-Kantian
> epistemological framework must have been influenced by this work. Yet
> nowhere do I recall Foucault acknowledging his influence. Is Vuillemin's
> influence on Foucault well known? If not, it certainly should be, for it
> strikes me that, at least for his early, 'archaeological' work, this book is
> as least as important as, if not more important than, the other usual
> sources of influence that are often cited, such as Canguilhem.
>
> Paul Taborsky, Zheng Li Shiji Dasha, Suite 1106, 199 Laodong Xilu,
> Changsha, Hunan, 410002 China.
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________
> Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the
> boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail. Click on Options in Mail and switch to
> New Mail today or register for free at http://mail.yahoo.ca
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 14
> Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 21:09:29 -0700 (PDT)
> From: pong naiyavitit <pongn@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Jules Vuillemin
> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <982703.49737.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
>
> wiki.fr claims that Vuillemin is a friend of Foucault, and they also
> discussed each other while Foucault worked on OT.
>
> http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jules_Vuillemin
>
> That's what I know
>
> pong
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On Tue, 5/19/09, Paul Taborsky <pdtaborsky@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Paul Taborsky <pdtaborsky@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [Foucault-L] Jules Vuillemin
> To: foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 9:28 AM
>
> I have been reading Jules Vuillemin's 'L'Heritage Kantienne et la
> revolution copernicienne: Fichte - Cohen - Heidegger', (1954), and it is
> obvious that a great deal of Foucault's ideas about the post-Kantian
> epistemological framework must have been influenced by this work. Yet
> nowhere do I recall Foucault acknowledging his influence. Is Vuillemin's
> influence on Foucault well known? If not, it certainly should be, for it
> strikes me that, at least for his early, 'archaeological' work, this book is
> as least as important as, if not more important than, the other usual
> sources of influence that are often cited, such as Canguilhem.
>
> Paul Taborsky, Zheng Li Shiji Dasha, Suite 1106, 199 Laodong Xilu,
> Changsha, Hunan, 410002 China.
>
>
>
> ? ? ? __________________________________________________________________
> Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the
> boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail.? Click on Options in Mail and switch to
> New Mail today or register for free at http://mail.yahoo.ca
> _______________________________________________
> Foucault-L mailing list
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 15
> Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 20:30:32 +0000
> From: <ian.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [Foucault-L] Using the forum
> To: <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <BLU121-W27D896CACF04D2D581F595E5590@xxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
> I have just subscribed to the forum/notice board and and replying in order
> to start leaving messages on the board.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 16
> Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 20:38:46 +0000
> From: <ian.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [Foucault-L] Foucault and interpretivism
> To: <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <BLU121-W668A98A839C590243043AE5590@xxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
> I am fairly new to Foucauldian methods and am currently trying to
> understand whether the idea of interpretation has any place in using
> Foucault's methods. I understand that for Foucault there is no inside or
> outside of discourse so in using his methods it is important to aviod
> searching for meaning.
>
>
>
> My question would be, when analysing data am I just describing the
> practices? But then surely my descriptions are only my interpretation? From
> what I can see (with my noice minds eye) there is no way out of
> interpretation, or am I just talking about two different things?
>
>
>
> Any feedback about this, or useful and informative pieces to read, or some
> general feedback on using Foucault would be much appreciated.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Ian
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 17
> Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 07:23:51 +0930
> From: David McInerney <vagabond@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Foucault and interpretivism
> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <4D3493A2-981B-412E-B919-4233F9A9BFDD@xxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
>
> Welcome to the list Ian.
>
> I was reading something the other day that discussed this issue.
>
> I think it might have been Dominick LaCapra's History and Reading:
> Tocqueville, Foucault, French Studies (University of Toronto Press,
> 2000). You might start there.
>
> You are right to assume that Foucault generally avoids searching for
> a meaning 'underneath' or 'behind' discourse in that hermeneutical
> sense, but I'm not sure how explicit he is about a lot of that. It
> seems to be more a general feature of his work, rather than something
> he intervenes on repeatedly. For that kind of thing you might get
> something more sustained in Deleuze, Althusser, or Macherey. The
> points where their positions on this intersect with those of Derrida
> perhaps indicate a general doxa - obviously there are divergences
> between all of these thinkers that are distinctive and mark out their
> different and opposed positions on certain points, but there is
> something to be gained by considering their shared assumptions, which
> indicate the shared terrain on which their disagreements play out.
>
> Unless someone can suggest a better alternative I'd say LaCapra's
> book's not a bad place to start.
>
> DM
>
>
> On 22/05/2009, at 6:08 AM, <ian.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I am fairly new to Foucauldian methods and am currently trying to
> > understand whether the idea of interpretation has any place in
> > using Foucault's methods. I understand that for Foucault there is
> > no inside or outside of discourse so in using his methods it is
> > important to aviod searching for meaning.
> >
> >
> >
> > My question would be, when analysing data am I just describing the
> > practices? But then surely my descriptions are only my
> > interpretation? From what I can see (with my noice minds eye) there
> > is no way out of interpretation, or am I just talking about two
> > different things?
> >
> >
> >
> > Any feedback about this, or useful and informative pieces to read,
> > or some general feedback on using Foucault would be much appreciated.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Ian
> > _______________________________________________
> > Foucault-L mailing list
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Foucault-L mailing list
> Foucault-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> http://foucault.info/mailman/listinfo/foucault-l
>
> End of Foucault-L Digest, Vol 9, Issue 18
> *****************************************
>
him about his call for papers on Foucault and Civil Society- I was wondering
if he could shoot me a quick email, or if someone could send me his email?
Thanks so much,
Matthew
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 3:53 PM, <foucault-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Send Foucault-L mailing list submissions to
> foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://foucault.info/mailman/listinfo/foucault-l
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> foucault-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> foucault-l-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Foucault-L digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Fwd: [PL] Query re. Foucault, Heidegger, the internet
> (Timothy O'Leary)
> 2. Info on foucauldian research in France (goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx)
> 3. Re : Info on foucauldian research in France (emmanuel pehau)
> 4. Re: Re : Info on foucauldian research in France
> (tp2277@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
> 5. Re: Info on foucauldian research in France (David McInerney)
> 6. Re: Info on foucauldian research in France (Chetan Vemuri)
> 7. looking for text (Michael Maidan)
> 8. Re: looking for text (Douglas Olena)
> 9. Re: looking for text (Timothy O'Leary)
> 10. Re: looking for text (Douglas Olena)
> 11. Re: looking for text (M. Karskens)
> 12. Re: Info on foucauldian research in France (james)
> 13. Jules Vuillemin (Paul Taborsky)
> 14. Re: Jules Vuillemin (pong naiyavitit)
> 15. Using the forum (ian.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
> 16. Foucault and interpretivism (ian.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
> 17. Re: Foucault and interpretivism (David McInerney)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 09:08:28 +0800
> From: "Timothy O'Leary" <autrement@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [Foucault-L] Fwd: [PL] Query re. Foucault, Heidegger, the
> internet
> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID:
> <fc06d9820905101808lfb1fc05q53f86d41cc81ed34@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Dear Foucault List,
> I am forwarding this from another philosophy list - it should get more
> responses here.
> Timothy
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Patience Moll <patiencemoll@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, May 11, 2009 at 7:36 AM
> Subject: [PL] Query re. Foucault, Heidegger, the internet
> To: PHILOS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> Dear all,
> I have another query for a student of mine pursuing a research project that
> analyzes the implications of the internet in terms of Foucault's theory of
> biopower/biopolitics and Heidegger's writings on technology. He is trying
> to argue that Heidegger's ontology is more successful than Foucault's
> theory
> of biopolitics for analyzing what is at stake, politically and ethically,
> in
> the development of the internet.
>
> If anyone knows of secondary material that directly addresses the internet
> in light of Foucault's and/or Heidegger's thinking, could you please send
> the reference to me off-list at patiencemoll@xxxxxxxxxxx?
>
> Thank you very much, and thanks to those who responded to my earlier query
> re. bioethics and sustainability.
>
> Patience Moll
> Lecturer
> Humanities Core Program
> U.C. Irvine
>
> ------------------------------
> Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail?. See
> how.<
> http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_QuickAdd1_052009
> >
> Messages to the list are archived at
> http://listserv.liv.ac.uk/archives/philos-l.html. Prolonged discussions
> should be moved to chora: enrol via
> http://listserv.liv.ac.uk/archives/chora.html. Other philosophical
> resources
> on the Web can be found at http://www.liv.ac.uk/pal.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 18:36:56 +0200
> From: <goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [Foucault-L] Info on foucauldian research in France
> To: Foucault-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <11560551.1242146216491.JavaMail.root@fep-13>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if anyone could help me with the following problem:
>
> while browsing through post-graduate "brochures" of French universities,
> especially that of EHESS's department of Political Science (who's research
> centre is named Raymond Aron - I am well aware of that) I could not find
> anyone (meaning professors) whose work would primarily deal with Michel
> Foucault (I have browsed through JSTOR, SAGE and persee.fr).
>
> The question is therefore the following: is the university
> Vincennes-St.Denis ?the (only) place? in France where foucauldian research
> is being conducted or has it become (because of it's ?nature?) so dispersed
> that it is everywhere yet nowhere??
>
> If someone could direct me to some/one/place with usefull information it
> would be greatelly appreciated.
>
>
> Best Regards, Goran Gaber
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 18:26:29 +0000 (GMT)
> From: emmanuel pehau <klossi_fr@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [Foucault-L] Re : Info on foucauldian research in France
> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <751079.20364.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> Hi, Goran.
>
> I've been studying philosophy at Vincennes for the last two years. As far
> as I know, it's the only place in France were foucaldian studies are part of
> the "daily meal". (And yes, it's one of the many reasons I'm there.)
>
> Emmanuel.
>
>
> ________________________________
> De : "goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx" <goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx>
> ? : Foucault-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Envoy? le : Mardi, 12 Mai 2009, 18h36mn 56s
> Objet : [Foucault-L] Info on foucauldian research in France
>
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if anyone could help me with the following problem:
>
> while browsing through post-graduate "brochures" of French universities,
> especially that of EHESS's department of Political Science (who's research
> centre is named Raymond Aron - I am well aware of that) I could not find
> anyone (meaning professors) whose work would primarily deal with Michel
> Foucault (I have browsed through JSTOR, SAGE and persee.fr).
>
> The question is therefore the following: is the university
> Vincennes-St.Denis ?the (only) place? in France where foucauldian research
> is being conducted or has it become (because of it's ?nature?) so dispersed
> that it is everywhere yet nowhere??
>
> If someone could direct me to some/one/place with usefull information it
> would be greatelly appreciated.
>
>
> Best Regards, Goran Gaber
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Foucault-L mailing list
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 14:31:31 -0400
> From: tp2277@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Re : Info on foucauldian research in France
> To: foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <20090512143131.6utxxplm8skcocsw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes";
> format="flowed"
>
> Hi, I do not know what you are looking for : a professor working on
> foucault or a place to do your phd where there would be people working
> on F. Anyway, you could get in touch with Frederic Gros, who is
> teaching at Paris XII and Sciences Po and who just edited the last
> (for now) of the courses of the college de france
> t.
>
> Citando emmanuel pehau <klossi_fr@xxxxxxxx>:
>
> > Hi, Goran.
> >
> > I've been studying philosophy at Vincennes for the last two years.
> > As far as I know, it's the only place in France were foucaldian
> > studies are part of the "daily meal". (And yes, it's one of the many
> > reasons I'm there.)
> >
> > Emmanuel.
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > De : "goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx" <goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx>
> > ? : Foucault-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Envoy? le : Mardi, 12 Mai 2009, 18h36mn 56s
> > Objet : [Foucault-L] Info on foucauldian research in France
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was wondering if anyone could help me with the following problem:
> >
> > while browsing through post-graduate "brochures" of French
> > universities, especially that of EHESS's department of Political
> > Science (who's research centre is named Raymond Aron - I am well
> > aware of that) I could not find anyone (meaning professors) whose
> > work would primarily deal with Michel Foucault (I have browsed
> > through JSTOR, SAGE and persee.fr).
> >
> > The question is therefore the following: is the university
> > Vincennes-St.Denis ?the (only) place? in France where foucauldian
> > research is being conducted or has it become (because of it's
> > ?nature?) so dispersed that it is everywhere yet nowhere??
> >
> > If someone could direct me to some/one/place with usefull
> > information it would be greatelly appreciated.
> >
> >
> > Best Regards, Goran Gaber
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Foucault-L mailing list
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Foucault-L mailing list
>
>
>
> Teresa Pullano
> Sciences Po Paris
> Fulbright-Schuman Postdoctoral Fellow
> Department of Political Science
> Columbia University
> New York
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 07:28:10 +0930
> From: David McInerney <vagabond@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Info on foucauldian research in France
> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <BD124F2C-589F-4D30-8655-4A738A01A952@xxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; delsp=yes;
> format=flowed
>
> This is an interesting problem.
>
> You would perhaps be best to speak to someone in France about it.
> I'm not sure that there are people in France who spend their whole
> lives studying Foucault - perhaps he's just not that exotic to
> them? Pierre Macherey for example has written important essays
> Foucault, but his main interest is in Spinoza, and he seems to have
> written at least as much on Canguilhem (who I believe supervised both
> him and Foucault) as on Foucault. He is retired now but maybe
> someone at his university (Lille III) is also working on Foucault.
> If you are comfortable speaking and writing in French you might try
> there. I know of at least two people from English-speaking countries
> who studied there with him in the 1990s.
>
> Here's his website: http://stl.recherche.univ-lille3.fr/
> sitespersonnels/macherey/accueilmacherey.html
>
>
> On 13/05/2009, at 2:06 AM, <goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was wondering if anyone could help me with the following problem:
> >
> > while browsing through post-graduate "brochures" of French
> > universities, especially that of EHESS's department of Political
> > Science (who's research centre is named Raymond Aron - I am well
> > aware of that) I could not find anyone (meaning professors) whose
> > work would primarily deal with Michel Foucault (I have browsed
> > through JSTOR, SAGE and persee.fr).
> >
> > The question is therefore the following: is the university
> > Vincennes-St.Denis ?the (only) place? in France where foucauldian
> > research is being conducted or has it become (because of it's
> > ?nature?) so dispersed that it is everywhere yet nowhere??
> >
> > If someone could direct me to some/one/place with usefull
> > information it would be greatelly appreciated.
> >
> >
> > Best Regards, Goran Gaber
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Foucault-L mailing list
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 17:40:46 -0500
> From: Chetan Vemuri <aryavartacnsrn@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Info on foucauldian research in France
> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID:
> <34cd98ba0905121540l232d735bgd5eb80eed6130c2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>
> University of Paris VII (I think that's it?) has Frederic Gros, who has
> edited and transcribed the lectures for 82, 83 and 84. A respected French
> scholar on Foucault.
> There is also Michel Senellart, but I forget where he works.
>
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 4:58 PM, David McInerney <vagabond@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> > This is an interesting problem.
> >
> > You would perhaps be best to speak to someone in France about it.
> > I'm not sure that there are people in France who spend their whole
> > lives studying Foucault - perhaps he's just not that exotic to
> > them? Pierre Macherey for example has written important essays
> > Foucault, but his main interest is in Spinoza, and he seems to have
> > written at least as much on Canguilhem (who I believe supervised both
> > him and Foucault) as on Foucault. He is retired now but maybe
> > someone at his university (Lille III) is also working on Foucault.
> > If you are comfortable speaking and writing in French you might try
> > there. I know of at least two people from English-speaking countries
> > who studied there with him in the 1990s.
> >
> > Here's his website: http://stl.recherche.univ-lille3.fr/
> > sitespersonnels/macherey/accueilmacherey.html
> >
> >
> > On 13/05/2009, at 2:06 AM, <goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I was wondering if anyone could help me with the following problem:
> > >
> > > while browsing through post-graduate "brochures" of French
> > > universities, especially that of EHESS's department of Political
> > > Science (who's research centre is named Raymond Aron - I am well
> > > aware of that) I could not find anyone (meaning professors) whose
> > > work would primarily deal with Michel Foucault (I have browsed
> > > through JSTOR, SAGE and persee.fr).
> > >
> > > The question is therefore the following: is the university
> > > Vincennes-St.Denis ?the (only) place? in France where foucauldian
> > > research is being conducted or has it become (because of it's
> > > ?nature?) so dispersed that it is everywhere yet nowhere??
> > >
> > > If someone could direct me to some/one/place with usefull
> > > information it would be greatelly appreciated.
> > >
> > >
> > > Best Regards, Goran Gaber
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Foucault-L mailing list
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Foucault-L mailing list
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Chetan Vemuri
> West Des Moines, IA
> aryavartacnsrn@xxxxxxxxx
> (319)-512-9318
> "You say you want a Revolution! Well you know, we all want to change the
> world"
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 17:44:08 -0400
> From: Michael Maidan <michael.maidan@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [Foucault-L] looking for text
> To: foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID:
> <b7a8c9f40905131444m714b9b3fl85848279c462e611@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Dear members of Foucault List,
>
>
>
> I am looking for the following text:
>
> *Foucault, Qu'est-ce que la critique ? (Critique et Aufkl?rung), Bulletin
> de la societe franciase de philosophie, **n?1990 84 2
> This is the text F's conference in 1978. is not in DE.
>
> Thanks for your asistance.
>
> Rgds,
>
>
> Michael Maidan
>
> *
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 18:04:35 -0500
> From: Douglas Olena <doug@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] looking for text
> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <160E2F4C-3C30-4CCD-AED3-C944E1D7F84B@xxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed;
> delsp=yes
>
> There is a reference to the essay in michel-foucault-archives
> http://www.michel-foucault-archives.org/spip.php?rubrique7&id_article=44
> during mai. But I can't find it in Dits et ?crits for 1978.
>
> An English translation can be found in Semiotext(e) The Politics of
> Truth.
>
> Doug
>
> ------------------------
> Douglas F. Olena
> doug@xxxxxxxxx
> http://olena.com/wordpress1/
> ------------------------
>
> On May 13, 2009, at 4:44 PM, Michael Maidan wrote:
>
> > Qu'est-ce que la critique
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 09:21:35 +0800
> From: "Timothy O'Leary" <autrement@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] looking for text
> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID:
> <fc06d9820905131821m31c52f5by8c8f3dc2c507cf0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Dear Michael,
>
> as far as I know, the only French publication of that text is still the
> original from 1990 in the Bulletin...
>
> It's well worth trying to get a copy of this (through inter-library loan?),
> as it contains a transcript of the Q&A session after the talk that is not
> in
> the English translation (unless it's in the new Semiotext(e) edition?).
>
> Timothy
>
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:44 AM, Michael Maidan <michael.maidan@xxxxxxxxx
> >wrote:
>
> > Dear members of Foucault List,
> >
> >
> >
> > I am looking for the following text:
> >
> > *Foucault, Qu'est-ce que la critique ? (Critique et Aufkl?rung),
> Bulletin
> > de la societe franciase de philosophie, **n?1990 84 2
> > This is the text F's conference in 1978. is not in DE.
> >
> > Thanks for your asistance.
> >
> > Rgds,
> >
> >
> > Michael Maidan
> >
> > *
> > _______________________________________________
> > Foucault-L mailing list
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 20:27:19 -0500
> From: Douglas Olena <doug@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] looking for text
> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <CE8D1BC1-1B41-4CEB-9E13-793AE0C46A13@xxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes
>
> the Q&A is in the Semiotext(e) English edition
>
> Doug
>
> ------------------------
> Douglas F. Olena
> doug@xxxxxxxxx
> http://olena.com/wordpress1/
> ------------------------
>
> On May 13, 2009, at 8:21 PM, Timothy O'Leary wrote:
>
> > Dear Michael,
> >
> > as far as I know, the only French publication of that text is still
> > the
> > original from 1990 in the Bulletin...
> >
> > It's well worth trying to get a copy of this (through inter-library
> > loan?),
> > as it contains a transcript of the Q&A session after the talk that
> > is not in
> > the English translation (unless it's in the new Semiotext(e)
> > edition?).
> >
> > Timothy
> >
> >
> > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:44 AM, Michael Maidan <
> michael.maidan@xxxxxxxxx
> > >wrote:
> >
> >> Dear members of Foucault List,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I am looking for the following text:
> >>
> >> *Foucault, Qu'est-ce que la critique ? (Critique et Aufkl?rung),
> >> Bulletin
> >> de la societe franciase de philosophie, **n?1990 84 2
> >> This is the text F's conference in 1978. is not in DE.
> >>
> >> Thanks for your asistance.
> >>
> >> Rgds,
> >>
> >>
> >> Michael Maidan
> >>
> >> *
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Foucault-L mailing list
> > _______________________________________________
> > Foucault-L mailing list
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 12:09:37 +0200
> From: "M. Karskens" <mkarskens@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] looking for text
> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <20090514100932.F4118C7096@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed
>
> a complete English translation of the conference
> and the discussion can be found in The
> Political ed. David Ingram, Blackwell 2002, pp. 191-211.
>
> yours
> machiel karskens
>
>
>
>
> At 23:44 13-5-2009, you wrote:
> >Dear members of Foucault List, I am looking for
> >the following text: *Foucault, Qu'est-ce que la
> >critique ? (Critique et Aufkl??rung), Bulletin
> >de la societe franciase de philosophie,
> >**n??1990 84 2 This is the text F's conference
> >in 1978. is not in DE. Thanks for your
> >asistance. Rgds, Michael Maidan *
> >_______________________________________________ Foucault-L mailing list
>
>
>
>
> Prof. Machiel Karskens
> social and political philosophy
> Faculty of Philosophy
> Radboud University Nijmegen - The Netherlands
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 15:13:55 -0400
> From: james <spatium@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Info on foucauldian research in France
> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID:
> <c74774220905161213i4947cb2o6d293934adc10b67@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>
> Michel Senellart was at ENS-LSH in Lyon last time I was there.
>
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Chetan Vemuri <aryavartacnsrn@xxxxxxxxx
> >wrote:
>
> > University of Paris VII (I think that's it?) has Frederic Gros, who has
> > edited and transcribed the lectures for 82, 83 and 84. A respected French
> > scholar on Foucault.
> > There is also Michel Senellart, but I forget where he works.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 4:58 PM, David McInerney <vagabond@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > This is an interesting problem.
> > >
> > > You would perhaps be best to speak to someone in France about it.
> > > I'm not sure that there are people in France who spend their whole
> > > lives studying Foucault - perhaps he's just not that exotic to
> > > them? Pierre Macherey for example has written important essays
> > > Foucault, but his main interest is in Spinoza, and he seems to have
> > > written at least as much on Canguilhem (who I believe supervised both
> > > him and Foucault) as on Foucault. He is retired now but maybe
> > > someone at his university (Lille III) is also working on Foucault.
> > > If you are comfortable speaking and writing in French you might try
> > > there. I know of at least two people from English-speaking countries
> > > who studied there with him in the 1990s.
> > >
> > > Here's his website: http://stl.recherche.univ-lille3.fr/
> > > sitespersonnels/macherey/accueilmacherey.html
> > >
> > >
> > > On 13/05/2009, at 2:06 AM, <goran.gaber@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I was wondering if anyone could help me with the following problem:
> > > >
> > > > while browsing through post-graduate "brochures" of French
> > > > universities, especially that of EHESS's department of Political
> > > > Science (who's research centre is named Raymond Aron - I am well
> > > > aware of that) I could not find anyone (meaning professors) whose
> > > > work would primarily deal with Michel Foucault (I have browsed
> > > > through JSTOR, SAGE and persee.fr).
> > > >
> > > > The question is therefore the following: is the university
> > > > Vincennes-St.Denis ?the (only) place? in France where foucauldian
> > > > research is being conducted or has it become (because of it's
> > > > ?nature?) so dispersed that it is everywhere yet nowhere??
> > > >
> > > > If someone could direct me to some/one/place with usefull
> > > > information it would be greatelly appreciated.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards, Goran Gaber
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Foucault-L mailing list
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Foucault-L mailing list
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Chetan Vemuri
> > West Des Moines, IA
> > aryavartacnsrn@xxxxxxxxx
> > (319)-512-9318
> > "You say you want a Revolution! Well you know, we all want to change the
> > world"
> > _______________________________________________
> > Foucault-L mailing list
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 19:28:11 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Paul Taborsky <pdtaborsky@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [Foucault-L] Jules Vuillemin
> To: foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <564631.80496.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> I have been reading Jules Vuillemin's 'L'Heritage Kantienne et la
> revolution copernicienne: Fichte - Cohen - Heidegger', (1954), and it is
> obvious that a great deal of Foucault's ideas about the post-Kantian
> epistemological framework must have been influenced by this work. Yet
> nowhere do I recall Foucault acknowledging his influence. Is Vuillemin's
> influence on Foucault well known? If not, it certainly should be, for it
> strikes me that, at least for his early, 'archaeological' work, this book is
> as least as important as, if not more important than, the other usual
> sources of influence that are often cited, such as Canguilhem.
>
> Paul Taborsky, Zheng Li Shiji Dasha, Suite 1106, 199 Laodong Xilu,
> Changsha, Hunan, 410002 China.
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________
> Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the
> boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail. Click on Options in Mail and switch to
> New Mail today or register for free at http://mail.yahoo.ca
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 14
> Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 21:09:29 -0700 (PDT)
> From: pong naiyavitit <pongn@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Jules Vuillemin
> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <982703.49737.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
>
> wiki.fr claims that Vuillemin is a friend of Foucault, and they also
> discussed each other while Foucault worked on OT.
>
> http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jules_Vuillemin
>
> That's what I know
>
> pong
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On Tue, 5/19/09, Paul Taborsky <pdtaborsky@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Paul Taborsky <pdtaborsky@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [Foucault-L] Jules Vuillemin
> To: foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 9:28 AM
>
> I have been reading Jules Vuillemin's 'L'Heritage Kantienne et la
> revolution copernicienne: Fichte - Cohen - Heidegger', (1954), and it is
> obvious that a great deal of Foucault's ideas about the post-Kantian
> epistemological framework must have been influenced by this work. Yet
> nowhere do I recall Foucault acknowledging his influence. Is Vuillemin's
> influence on Foucault well known? If not, it certainly should be, for it
> strikes me that, at least for his early, 'archaeological' work, this book is
> as least as important as, if not more important than, the other usual
> sources of influence that are often cited, such as Canguilhem.
>
> Paul Taborsky, Zheng Li Shiji Dasha, Suite 1106, 199 Laodong Xilu,
> Changsha, Hunan, 410002 China.
>
>
>
> ? ? ? __________________________________________________________________
> Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the
> boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail.? Click on Options in Mail and switch to
> New Mail today or register for free at http://mail.yahoo.ca
> _______________________________________________
> Foucault-L mailing list
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 15
> Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 20:30:32 +0000
> From: <ian.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [Foucault-L] Using the forum
> To: <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <BLU121-W27D896CACF04D2D581F595E5590@xxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
> I have just subscribed to the forum/notice board and and replying in order
> to start leaving messages on the board.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 16
> Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 20:38:46 +0000
> From: <ian.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [Foucault-L] Foucault and interpretivism
> To: <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <BLU121-W668A98A839C590243043AE5590@xxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
> I am fairly new to Foucauldian methods and am currently trying to
> understand whether the idea of interpretation has any place in using
> Foucault's methods. I understand that for Foucault there is no inside or
> outside of discourse so in using his methods it is important to aviod
> searching for meaning.
>
>
>
> My question would be, when analysing data am I just describing the
> practices? But then surely my descriptions are only my interpretation? From
> what I can see (with my noice minds eye) there is no way out of
> interpretation, or am I just talking about two different things?
>
>
>
> Any feedback about this, or useful and informative pieces to read, or some
> general feedback on using Foucault would be much appreciated.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Ian
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 17
> Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 07:23:51 +0930
> From: David McInerney <vagabond@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Foucault and interpretivism
> To: Mailing-list <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <4D3493A2-981B-412E-B919-4233F9A9BFDD@xxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
>
> Welcome to the list Ian.
>
> I was reading something the other day that discussed this issue.
>
> I think it might have been Dominick LaCapra's History and Reading:
> Tocqueville, Foucault, French Studies (University of Toronto Press,
> 2000). You might start there.
>
> You are right to assume that Foucault generally avoids searching for
> a meaning 'underneath' or 'behind' discourse in that hermeneutical
> sense, but I'm not sure how explicit he is about a lot of that. It
> seems to be more a general feature of his work, rather than something
> he intervenes on repeatedly. For that kind of thing you might get
> something more sustained in Deleuze, Althusser, or Macherey. The
> points where their positions on this intersect with those of Derrida
> perhaps indicate a general doxa - obviously there are divergences
> between all of these thinkers that are distinctive and mark out their
> different and opposed positions on certain points, but there is
> something to be gained by considering their shared assumptions, which
> indicate the shared terrain on which their disagreements play out.
>
> Unless someone can suggest a better alternative I'd say LaCapra's
> book's not a bad place to start.
>
> DM
>
>
> On 22/05/2009, at 6:08 AM, <ian.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I am fairly new to Foucauldian methods and am currently trying to
> > understand whether the idea of interpretation has any place in
> > using Foucault's methods. I understand that for Foucault there is
> > no inside or outside of discourse so in using his methods it is
> > important to aviod searching for meaning.
> >
> >
> >
> > My question would be, when analysing data am I just describing the
> > practices? But then surely my descriptions are only my
> > interpretation? From what I can see (with my noice minds eye) there
> > is no way out of interpretation, or am I just talking about two
> > different things?
> >
> >
> >
> > Any feedback about this, or useful and informative pieces to read,
> > or some general feedback on using Foucault would be much appreciated.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Ian
> > _______________________________________________
> > Foucault-L mailing list
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Foucault-L mailing list
> Foucault-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> http://foucault.info/mailman/listinfo/foucault-l
>
> End of Foucault-L Digest, Vol 9, Issue 18
> *****************************************
>