I seem to remember that the little book 'Remarks on Marx' - later published in a different translation - had a lot in it on the critical theorists
On 28/09/2011, at 7:46 PM, Karskens, M.L.J. (Machiel) wrote:
> The best text of Foucault is the second part of his article The Subject and Power. There, he explicitly discusses his theory of power/politics as being different from Habermas'theory of communication.
>
> yours
> machiel karskens
>
> Reno" <renomich@xxxxxxx>
>> To: "Mailing-list" <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 8:43:26 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Foucault-Habermas Debate
>>
>> critique and power, subtitled, recasting the Foucault-Habermas debate,
>> has many of the primary texts
>>
>> On 9/27/2011 10:35 AM, ari wrote:
>>> axel honneth 'critique of power' is a classic on this.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:30:24 +0100, Tee Dub wrote:
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> I am in my fourth year at the University of Edinburgh and have
>>>> decided to do my dissertation on Foucault and in particular the
>>>> ‘debate’ that he had with Habermas over the term ‘power’. I am in
>> the
>>>> very early stages of the project and am in need of some advice.
>> Would
>>>> anyone be able to tell me what the central area of conflict between
>>>> the two was and know where Foucault best outlines his opinion of
>>>> power
>>>> and where Habermas outlines his? Also are there any secondary
>> sources
>>>> that I may find useful?
>>>>
>>>> Any help is much appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Terrence
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Foucault-L mailing list
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Foucault-L mailing list
>> _______________________________________________
>> Foucault-L mailing list
>
> _______________________________________________
> Foucault-L mailing list
On 28/09/2011, at 7:46 PM, Karskens, M.L.J. (Machiel) wrote:
> The best text of Foucault is the second part of his article The Subject and Power. There, he explicitly discusses his theory of power/politics as being different from Habermas'theory of communication.
>
> yours
> machiel karskens
>
> Reno" <renomich@xxxxxxx>
>> To: "Mailing-list" <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 8:43:26 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Foucault-Habermas Debate
>>
>> critique and power, subtitled, recasting the Foucault-Habermas debate,
>> has many of the primary texts
>>
>> On 9/27/2011 10:35 AM, ari wrote:
>>> axel honneth 'critique of power' is a classic on this.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:30:24 +0100, Tee Dub wrote:
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> I am in my fourth year at the University of Edinburgh and have
>>>> decided to do my dissertation on Foucault and in particular the
>>>> ‘debate’ that he had with Habermas over the term ‘power’. I am in
>> the
>>>> very early stages of the project and am in need of some advice.
>> Would
>>>> anyone be able to tell me what the central area of conflict between
>>>> the two was and know where Foucault best outlines his opinion of
>>>> power
>>>> and where Habermas outlines his? Also are there any secondary
>> sources
>>>> that I may find useful?
>>>>
>>>> Any help is much appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Terrence
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Foucault-L mailing list
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Foucault-L mailing list
>> _______________________________________________
>> Foucault-L mailing list
>
> _______________________________________________
> Foucault-L mailing list