Re: [Foucault-L] Foucault-Habermas Debate

I think that there is not a real debate between Habermas and Foucault.
Anyway, you can find the central area of conflict in "The Philosophical
Discourse of Modernity".
Best,

Guillermo



2011/9/28 David McInerney <vagabond@xxxxxxxxx>

> I have to agree with this!
>
>
> On 28/09/2011, at 8:52 PM, ari wrote:
>
> > if you can't do that best not even try reading the stuff!
> >
> > On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:28:23 +0530, Amitranjan Basu wrote:
> >> no one is providing the full citation so that i can search!
> >>
> >> On 28 September 2011 16:17, David McInerney <vagabond@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I seem to remember that the little book 'Remarks on Marx' - later
> >>> published
> >>> in a different translation - had a lot in it on the critical
> >>> theorists
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 28/09/2011, at 7:46 PM, Karskens, M.L.J. (Machiel) wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> The best text of Foucault is the second part of his article The
> >>> Subject
> >>> and Power. There, he explicitly discusses his theory of
> >>> power/politics as
> >>> being different from Habermas'theory of communication.
> >>>>
> >>>> yours
> >>>> machiel karskens
> >>>>
> >>>> Reno" <renomich@xxxxxxx>
> >>>>> To: "Mailing-list" <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 8:43:26 PM
> >>>>> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Foucault-Habermas Debate
> >>>>>
> >>>>> critique and power, subtitled, recasting the Foucault-Habermas
> >>> debate,
> >>>>> has many of the primary texts
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 9/27/2011 10:35 AM, ari wrote:
> >>>>>> axel honneth 'critique of power' is a classic on this.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:30:24 +0100, Tee Dub wrote:
> >>>>>>> Dear all,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I am in my fourth year at the University of Edinburgh and have
> >>>>>>> decided to do my dissertation on Foucault and in particular the
> >>>>>>> ‘debate’ that he had with Habermas over the term ‘power’. I am
> >>> in
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>> very early stages of the project and am in need of some advice.
> >>>>> Would
> >>>>>>> anyone be able to tell me what the central area of conflict
> >>> between
> >>>>>>> the two was and know where Foucault best outlines his opinion
> >>> of
> >>>>>>> power
> >>>>>>> and where Habermas outlines his? Also are there any secondary
> >>>>> sources
> >>>>>>> that I may find useful?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Any help is much appreciated.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Terrence
> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> Foucault-L mailing list
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> Foucault-L mailing list
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Foucault-L mailing list
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Foucault-L mailing list
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Foucault-L mailing list
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Foucault-L mailing list
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Foucault-L mailing list
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Foucault-L mailing list
>

Folow-ups
  • Re: [Foucault-L] Foucault-Habermas Debate
    • From: Burak Kose
  • Replies
    Re: [Foucault-L] Foucault-Habermas Debate, Karskens, M.L.J. (Machiel)
    Re: [Foucault-L] Foucault-Habermas Debate, David McInerney
    Re: [Foucault-L] Foucault-Habermas Debate, Amitranjan Basu
    Re: [Foucault-L] Foucault-Habermas Debate, ari
    Re: [Foucault-L] Foucault-Habermas Debate, David McInerney
    Partial thread listing: