Re: [Foucault-L] Foucault-Habermas Debate

I have to agree with this!


On 28/09/2011, at 8:52 PM, ari wrote:

> if you can't do that best not even try reading the stuff!
>
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:28:23 +0530, Amitranjan Basu wrote:
>> no one is providing the full citation so that i can search!
>>
>> On 28 September 2011 16:17, David McInerney <vagabond@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I seem to remember that the little book 'Remarks on Marx' - later
>>> published
>>> in a different translation - had a lot in it on the critical
>>> theorists
>>>
>>>
>>> On 28/09/2011, at 7:46 PM, Karskens, M.L.J. (Machiel) wrote:
>>>
>>>> The best text of Foucault is the second part of his article The
>>> Subject
>>> and Power. There, he explicitly discusses his theory of
>>> power/politics as
>>> being different from Habermas'theory of communication.
>>>>
>>>> yours
>>>> machiel karskens
>>>>
>>>> Reno" <renomich@xxxxxxx>
>>>>> To: "Mailing-list" <foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 8:43:26 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Foucault-L] Foucault-Habermas Debate
>>>>>
>>>>> critique and power, subtitled, recasting the Foucault-Habermas
>>> debate,
>>>>> has many of the primary texts
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/27/2011 10:35 AM, ari wrote:
>>>>>> axel honneth 'critique of power' is a classic on this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:30:24 +0100, Tee Dub wrote:
>>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am in my fourth year at the University of Edinburgh and have
>>>>>>> decided to do my dissertation on Foucault and in particular the
>>>>>>> ‘debate’ that he had with Habermas over the term ‘power’. I am
>>> in
>>>>> the
>>>>>>> very early stages of the project and am in need of some advice.
>>>>> Would
>>>>>>> anyone be able to tell me what the central area of conflict
>>> between
>>>>>>> the two was and know where Foucault best outlines his opinion
>>> of
>>>>>>> power
>>>>>>> and where Habermas outlines his? Also are there any secondary
>>>>> sources
>>>>>>> that I may find useful?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any help is much appreciated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Terrence
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Foucault-L mailing list
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Foucault-L mailing list
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Foucault-L mailing list
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Foucault-L mailing list
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Foucault-L mailing list
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Foucault-L mailing list
>
> _______________________________________________
> Foucault-L mailing list



Folow-ups
  • Re: [Foucault-L] Foucault-Habermas Debate
    • From: Guillermo Vega
  • Replies
    Re: [Foucault-L] Foucault-Habermas Debate, Karskens, M.L.J. (Machiel)
    Re: [Foucault-L] Foucault-Habermas Debate, David McInerney
    Re: [Foucault-L] Foucault-Habermas Debate, Amitranjan Basu
    Re: [Foucault-L] Foucault-Habermas Debate, ari
    Partial thread listing: